Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems

Private operators now dominate input supply, crop buying and ginning activities in many African cotton sectors. Varying levels of competition are observed, but greater levels of competition are not necessarily associated with better system performance. This paper explores this phenomenon, drawing on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development 2004-03, Vol.32 (3), p.519-536
Hauptverfasser: Poulton, Colin, Gibbon, Peter, Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine, Kydd, Jonathan, Maro, Wilbald, Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted, Osorio, Afonso, Tschirley, David, Zulu, Ballard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 536
container_issue 3
container_start_page 519
container_title World development
container_volume 32
creator Poulton, Colin
Gibbon, Peter
Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine
Kydd, Jonathan
Maro, Wilbald
Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted
Osorio, Afonso
Tschirley, David
Zulu, Ballard
description Private operators now dominate input supply, crop buying and ginning activities in many African cotton sectors. Varying levels of competition are observed, but greater levels of competition are not necessarily associated with better system performance. This paper explores this phenomenon, drawing on the liberalization experience of Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. While the capacity of the state to support markets remains weak, there may be tradeoffs between the level of competition and the degree of coordination achieved between players within a sector. Different sectoral structures are observed, with a different role for the state appropriate for each.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37875322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305750X03002328</els_id><sourcerecordid>668019491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-2f2ab629a40a304778512dcb3c1fbd1d4c722e82238b7f66d6e4d245c8b7d223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxS0EEmXhK6CIA-KSrv_EdnJjVS2wqyIO7IGb5dgT4ZLEwXa7Kp-e6RY4cIDD-MnPv3myPYS8ZHTNKFOXu_V9TKP3cFhzSgWaa5RHZMVaLWrZdewxWVFBZa0l_fKUPMt5RymVotMrcrOJ0wIllBDnys6-2sSYfJjtgxHmaht6SHYMP8BXV0MKzs7IlIKnH236BqX6fMwFpvycPBnsmOHFL70gd--u7zYf6u2n9zebq23tpGCl5gO3veKdbagVtNG6lYx71wvHht4z3zjNObSci7bXg1JeQeN5Ix1uPboX5PU5dknx-x5yMVPIDsbRzhD32QjdaikewDf_BBkVUrWCM4boq7_QXdynGV9hOO9kJ5kSCKkz5FLMOcFglhQmm46YZE6DMDvzexDmNIiTj4KNt-fGBAu4P10AcI8ojOZghBUclyMWdjYo4eRhLViSdUYKZb6WCcPensMAv_gQIJnsAswOfEjgivEx_O8-PwGdQK1J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229595163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Poulton, Colin ; Gibbon, Peter ; Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine ; Kydd, Jonathan ; Maro, Wilbald ; Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted ; Osorio, Afonso ; Tschirley, David ; Zulu, Ballard</creator><creatorcontrib>Poulton, Colin ; Gibbon, Peter ; Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine ; Kydd, Jonathan ; Maro, Wilbald ; Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted ; Osorio, Afonso ; Tschirley, David ; Zulu, Ballard</creatorcontrib><description>Private operators now dominate input supply, crop buying and ginning activities in many African cotton sectors. Varying levels of competition are observed, but greater levels of competition are not necessarily associated with better system performance. This paper explores this phenomenon, drawing on the liberalization experience of Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. While the capacity of the state to support markets remains weak, there may be tradeoffs between the level of competition and the degree of coordination achieved between players within a sector. Different sectoral structures are observed, with a different role for the state appropriate for each.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WODEDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Africa ; Competition ; Coordination ; Cotton ; Development ; Development studies ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Industrywide conditions ; Liberalization ; market liberalization ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Textile industry</subject><ispartof>World development, 2004-03, Vol.32 (3), p.519-536</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-2f2ab629a40a304778512dcb3c1fbd1d4c722e82238b7f66d6e4d245c8b7d223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-2f2ab629a40a304778512dcb3c1fbd1d4c722e82238b7f66d6e4d245c8b7d223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X03002328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeewdevel/v_3a32_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a519-536.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poulton, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbon, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maro, Wilbald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Ballard</creatorcontrib><title>Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems</title><title>World development</title><description>Private operators now dominate input supply, crop buying and ginning activities in many African cotton sectors. Varying levels of competition are observed, but greater levels of competition are not necessarily associated with better system performance. This paper explores this phenomenon, drawing on the liberalization experience of Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. While the capacity of the state to support markets remains weak, there may be tradeoffs between the level of competition and the degree of coordination achieved between players within a sector. Different sectoral structures are observed, with a different role for the state appropriate for each.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Industrywide conditions</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>market liberalization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxS0EEmXhK6CIA-KSrv_EdnJjVS2wqyIO7IGb5dgT4ZLEwXa7Kp-e6RY4cIDD-MnPv3myPYS8ZHTNKFOXu_V9TKP3cFhzSgWaa5RHZMVaLWrZdewxWVFBZa0l_fKUPMt5RymVotMrcrOJ0wIllBDnys6-2sSYfJjtgxHmaht6SHYMP8BXV0MKzs7IlIKnH236BqX6fMwFpvycPBnsmOHFL70gd--u7zYf6u2n9zebq23tpGCl5gO3veKdbagVtNG6lYx71wvHht4z3zjNObSci7bXg1JeQeN5Ix1uPboX5PU5dknx-x5yMVPIDsbRzhD32QjdaikewDf_BBkVUrWCM4boq7_QXdynGV9hOO9kJ5kSCKkz5FLMOcFglhQmm46YZE6DMDvzexDmNIiTj4KNt-fGBAu4P10AcI8ojOZghBUclyMWdjYo4eRhLViSdUYKZb6WCcPensMAv_gQIJnsAswOfEjgivEx_O8-PwGdQK1J</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Poulton, Colin</creator><creator>Gibbon, Peter</creator><creator>Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine</creator><creator>Kydd, Jonathan</creator><creator>Maro, Wilbald</creator><creator>Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted</creator><creator>Osorio, Afonso</creator><creator>Tschirley, David</creator><creator>Zulu, Ballard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems</title><author>Poulton, Colin ; Gibbon, Peter ; Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine ; Kydd, Jonathan ; Maro, Wilbald ; Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted ; Osorio, Afonso ; Tschirley, David ; Zulu, Ballard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-2f2ab629a40a304778512dcb3c1fbd1d4c722e82238b7f66d6e4d245c8b7d223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Industrywide conditions</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>market liberalization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poulton, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbon, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kydd, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maro, Wilbald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Ballard</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poulton, Colin</au><au>Gibbon, Peter</au><au>Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine</au><au>Kydd, Jonathan</au><au>Maro, Wilbald</au><au>Larsen, Marianne Nylandsted</au><au>Osorio, Afonso</au><au>Tschirley, David</au><au>Zulu, Ballard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>519-536</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><coden>WODEDW</coden><abstract>Private operators now dominate input supply, crop buying and ginning activities in many African cotton sectors. Varying levels of competition are observed, but greater levels of competition are not necessarily associated with better system performance. This paper explores this phenomenon, drawing on the liberalization experience of Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. While the capacity of the state to support markets remains weak, there may be tradeoffs between the level of competition and the degree of coordination achieved between players within a sector. Different sectoral structures are observed, with a different role for the state appropriate for each.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.003</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 2004-03, Vol.32 (3), p.519-536
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37875322
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Africa
Competition
Coordination
Cotton
Development
Development studies
Economic growth
Economics
Industrywide conditions
Liberalization
market liberalization
Studies
Sustainable development
Textile industry
title Competition and Coordination in Liberalized African Cotton Market Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A20%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20and%20Coordination%20in%20Liberalized%20African%20Cotton%20Market%20Systems&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Poulton,%20Colin&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=519-536&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft.coden=WODEDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E668019491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229595163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0305750X03002328&rfr_iscdi=true