Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives

Across Europe, different kinds of research organisations are confronted with the challenge of managing their most valuable resources, which are knowledge based, in a more explicit and transparent manner. Over the last few years a small number of research organisations have started to implement new i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management accounting research 2004-03, Vol.15 (1), p.33-51
Hauptverfasser: Leitner, Karl-Heinz, Warden, Campbell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
container_title Management accounting research
container_volume 15
creator Leitner, Karl-Heinz
Warden, Campbell
description Across Europe, different kinds of research organisations are confronted with the challenge of managing their most valuable resources, which are knowledge based, in a more explicit and transparent manner. Over the last few years a small number of research organisations have started to implement new instruments for managing and measuring their knowledge-based resources and processes. The research organisations ARC (Austria) and DLR (Germany) have been the first European research organisations to publish Intellectual Capital Reports for their entire organisation, using a similar model, which addresses both the issues of internal management as well as external reporting. In both organisations, the newly established instruments are based on an indicator-based system. In this system, indicators about the different forms of Intellectual Capital (IC), the value-added processes and the results of the organisational knowledge-production processes, are integrated. Based on the experiences of implementing and running the system for 4 years, various aspects and the lessons that have been learned, are discussed. One of the main benefits of these IC measurement and reporting systems is that the organisations learn about their knowledge-production processes. However, there are some trade-offs between internal management use and external reporting, as well as limits in comparing indicators between organisations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mar.2003.10.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37869084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1044500503000684</els_id><sourcerecordid>566175641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-61cf4171e3bffece2868e510d8422230c3b9846a4ad0cf2259d6a77233873c493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3EAMxyMEEs8PwC3qgVOzeB47SeipQuUhgbjAeTQ7cZbZhpntOAvqB-B747A99cDJ_ts_W34UxamAmQBhzlezF5dnEkCxngHMd4oDAa2phJR6d_K1ruYc3y8OiVYA0IJqD4r3exfdMsRl6WJXZlynPE7qd0xvA3ZLrBaOcMpQ2mSP9Mmtc2KXWIU4pdBl_1ymvHQxkBtDinRR0hp96IOn7-XAMMfYuhy522cPzBMxhlek42KvdwPhyT97VDxd_Xq8vKnuHq5vL3_eVV62ZqyM8L0WtUC16Hv0KBvT4FxA12gppQKvFm2jjdOuA99LOW874-paKtXUyutWHRVn2768wJ8N0mhfAnkcBhcxbciqujEtNJrBb_-BK14_8mxWSjBCNaZmSGwhnxNRxt6uc-A3_LUC7PQVu7Is7fSVKcTX55of2xrkNV8DZks-YPTYhczHsF0KX1R_AMhRlz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220613867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Leitner, Karl-Heinz ; Warden, Campbell</creator><creatorcontrib>Leitner, Karl-Heinz ; Warden, Campbell</creatorcontrib><description>Across Europe, different kinds of research organisations are confronted with the challenge of managing their most valuable resources, which are knowledge based, in a more explicit and transparent manner. Over the last few years a small number of research organisations have started to implement new instruments for managing and measuring their knowledge-based resources and processes. The research organisations ARC (Austria) and DLR (Germany) have been the first European research organisations to publish Intellectual Capital Reports for their entire organisation, using a similar model, which addresses both the issues of internal management as well as external reporting. In both organisations, the newly established instruments are based on an indicator-based system. In this system, indicators about the different forms of Intellectual Capital (IC), the value-added processes and the results of the organisational knowledge-production processes, are integrated. Based on the experiences of implementing and running the system for 4 years, various aspects and the lessons that have been learned, are discussed. One of the main benefits of these IC measurement and reporting systems is that the organisations learn about their knowledge-production processes. However, there are some trade-offs between internal management use and external reporting, as well as limits in comparing indicators between organisations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-5005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2003.10.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accounting ; Assets ; Austria ; Capital ; Europe ; Germany ; Intangible assets ; Intellectual capital ; Intellectual capital reports ; Knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Organizational behavior ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research and development ; Research organisations ; Researchers ; Studies ; Valuation ; Valuation of R&amp;D</subject><ispartof>Management accounting research, 2004-03, Vol.15 (1), p.33-51</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-61cf4171e3bffece2868e510d8422230c3b9846a4ad0cf2259d6a77233873c493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-61cf4171e3bffece2868e510d8422230c3b9846a4ad0cf2259d6a77233873c493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.10.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leitner, Karl-Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warden, Campbell</creatorcontrib><title>Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives</title><title>Management accounting research</title><description>Across Europe, different kinds of research organisations are confronted with the challenge of managing their most valuable resources, which are knowledge based, in a more explicit and transparent manner. Over the last few years a small number of research organisations have started to implement new instruments for managing and measuring their knowledge-based resources and processes. The research organisations ARC (Austria) and DLR (Germany) have been the first European research organisations to publish Intellectual Capital Reports for their entire organisation, using a similar model, which addresses both the issues of internal management as well as external reporting. In both organisations, the newly established instruments are based on an indicator-based system. In this system, indicators about the different forms of Intellectual Capital (IC), the value-added processes and the results of the organisational knowledge-production processes, are integrated. Based on the experiences of implementing and running the system for 4 years, various aspects and the lessons that have been learned, are discussed. One of the main benefits of these IC measurement and reporting systems is that the organisations learn about their knowledge-production processes. However, there are some trade-offs between internal management use and external reporting, as well as limits in comparing indicators between organisations.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Intellectual capital</subject><subject>Intellectual capital reports</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Research organisations</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Valuation of R&amp;D</subject><issn>1044-5005</issn><issn>1096-1224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3EAMxyMEEs8PwC3qgVOzeB47SeipQuUhgbjAeTQ7cZbZhpntOAvqB-B747A99cDJ_ts_W34UxamAmQBhzlezF5dnEkCxngHMd4oDAa2phJR6d_K1ruYc3y8OiVYA0IJqD4r3exfdMsRl6WJXZlynPE7qd0xvA3ZLrBaOcMpQ2mSP9Mmtc2KXWIU4pdBl_1ymvHQxkBtDinRR0hp96IOn7-XAMMfYuhy522cPzBMxhlek42KvdwPhyT97VDxd_Xq8vKnuHq5vL3_eVV62ZqyM8L0WtUC16Hv0KBvT4FxA12gppQKvFm2jjdOuA99LOW874-paKtXUyutWHRVn2768wJ8N0mhfAnkcBhcxbciqujEtNJrBb_-BK14_8mxWSjBCNaZmSGwhnxNRxt6uc-A3_LUC7PQVu7Is7fSVKcTX55of2xrkNV8DZks-YPTYhczHsF0KX1R_AMhRlz8</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Leitner, Karl-Heinz</creator><creator>Warden, Campbell</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives</title><author>Leitner, Karl-Heinz ; Warden, Campbell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-61cf4171e3bffece2868e510d8422230c3b9846a4ad0cf2259d6a77233873c493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Intellectual capital</topic><topic>Intellectual capital reports</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Research organisations</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Valuation of R&amp;D</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leitner, Karl-Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warden, Campbell</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leitner, Karl-Heinz</au><au>Warden, Campbell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Management accounting research</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>33-51</pages><issn>1044-5005</issn><eissn>1096-1224</eissn><abstract>Across Europe, different kinds of research organisations are confronted with the challenge of managing their most valuable resources, which are knowledge based, in a more explicit and transparent manner. Over the last few years a small number of research organisations have started to implement new instruments for managing and measuring their knowledge-based resources and processes. The research organisations ARC (Austria) and DLR (Germany) have been the first European research organisations to publish Intellectual Capital Reports for their entire organisation, using a similar model, which addresses both the issues of internal management as well as external reporting. In both organisations, the newly established instruments are based on an indicator-based system. In this system, indicators about the different forms of Intellectual Capital (IC), the value-added processes and the results of the organisational knowledge-production processes, are integrated. Based on the experiences of implementing and running the system for 4 years, various aspects and the lessons that have been learned, are discussed. One of the main benefits of these IC measurement and reporting systems is that the organisations learn about their knowledge-production processes. However, there are some trade-offs between internal management use and external reporting, as well as limits in comparing indicators between organisations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.mar.2003.10.005</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-5005
ispartof Management accounting research, 2004-03, Vol.15 (1), p.33-51
issn 1044-5005
1096-1224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37869084
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accountability
Accounting
Assets
Austria
Capital
Europe
Germany
Intangible assets
Intellectual capital
Intellectual capital reports
Knowledge
Knowledge management
Organizational behavior
R&D
Research & development
Research and development
Research organisations
Researchers
Studies
Valuation
Valuation of R&D
title Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A40%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20and%20reporting%20knowledge-based%20resources%20and%20processes%20in%20research%20organisations:%20specifics,%20lessons%20learned%20and%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=Management%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Leitner,%20Karl-Heinz&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=33-51&rft.issn=1044-5005&rft.eissn=1096-1224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mar.2003.10.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E566175641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220613867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1044500503000684&rfr_iscdi=true