Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990

This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communitie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American economic review 2003-12, Vol.93 (5), p.1648-1677
Hauptverfasser: Rhode, Paul W., Strumpf, Koleman S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1677
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1648
container_title The American economic review
container_volume 93
creator Rhode, Paul W.
Strumpf, Koleman S.
description This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communities of individual public good preferences and of public good provision must (weakly) increase. Given the secular decline in mobility costs, these predictions can be evaluated using historical data. We find decreasing heterogeneity in policies and proxies for preferences across (i) a sample of U.S. municipalities (1870-1990); (ii) all Boston-area municipalities (1870-1990); and (iii) all U.S. counties (1850-1990).
doi_str_mv 10.1257/000282803322655482
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37855495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3132146</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3132146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-63433e9e98b79ddd7e85a6b6134d6f2206c880bc8143661af1deefd4195e4e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqHxAPwYO31UySzSbeSqm2UBC092U_ZuuW3U1Nsof-e1MqHvQUJjzvMLyE3AJ7BJ5mT4wxrrlmQnCu0lRqfkYmYKRMMqPhnEyOIImCX5Ir73fsOEM2Ie8z79H7dtjS8Il01e-tC8VQIbUN3bRY2jHQj_gXxTNd26ro6BIDOrvFAdtwoI2zPQWdMhosBWPYNblois7jzc87JZuXxWa-TNZvr6v5bJ1U0qiQKCGFQINGl5mp6zpDnRaqVCBkrRrOmaq0ZmWlQQqloGigRmxqCSZFiVJMycNp7d7ZrxF9yPvWV9h1xYB29LnIdCzCpBHe_4E7O7ohnpZzIZjgDFhE_IQqZ7132OR71_aFO-TA8mPF-f-KY-juFNr5YN1vQoDgIJX4Bl-9dPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233032010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Rhode, Paul W. ; Strumpf, Koleman S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhode, Paul W. ; Strumpf, Koleman S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communities of individual public good preferences and of public good provision must (weakly) increase. Given the secular decline in mobility costs, these predictions can be evaluated using historical data. We find decreasing heterogeneity in policies and proxies for preferences across (i) a sample of U.S. municipalities (1870-1990); (ii) all Boston-area municipalities (1870-1990); and (iii) all U.S. counties (1850-1990).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/000282803322655482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Censuses ; Communities ; Community ; Community power ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Education ; Factor mobility ; Game theory ; Geography ; Hypotheses ; Income taxes ; Mobility ; Modeling ; Municipalities ; Per capita ; Preferences ; Proxies ; Public good ; Public goods ; Regional disparities ; Regional economics ; Residential mobility ; Retirement communities ; School taxes ; Segregation ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Tax policy ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2003-12, Vol.93 (5), p.1648-1677</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-63433e9e98b79ddd7e85a6b6134d6f2206c880bc8143661af1deefd4195e4e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-63433e9e98b79ddd7e85a6b6134d6f2206c880bc8143661af1deefd4195e4e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3132146$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3132146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3746,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhode, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Koleman S.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communities of individual public good preferences and of public good provision must (weakly) increase. Given the secular decline in mobility costs, these predictions can be evaluated using historical data. We find decreasing heterogeneity in policies and proxies for preferences across (i) a sample of U.S. municipalities (1870-1990); (ii) all Boston-area municipalities (1870-1990); and (iii) all U.S. counties (1850-1990).</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community power</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Factor mobility</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Proxies</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Regional disparities</subject><subject>Regional economics</subject><subject>Residential mobility</subject><subject>Retirement communities</subject><subject>School taxes</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqHxAPwYO31UySzSbeSqm2UBC092U_ZuuW3U1Nsof-e1MqHvQUJjzvMLyE3AJ7BJ5mT4wxrrlmQnCu0lRqfkYmYKRMMqPhnEyOIImCX5Ir73fsOEM2Ie8z79H7dtjS8Il01e-tC8VQIbUN3bRY2jHQj_gXxTNd26ro6BIDOrvFAdtwoI2zPQWdMhosBWPYNblois7jzc87JZuXxWa-TNZvr6v5bJ1U0qiQKCGFQINGl5mp6zpDnRaqVCBkrRrOmaq0ZmWlQQqloGigRmxqCSZFiVJMycNp7d7ZrxF9yPvWV9h1xYB29LnIdCzCpBHe_4E7O7ohnpZzIZjgDFhE_IQqZ7132OR71_aFO-TA8mPF-f-KY-juFNr5YN1vQoDgIJX4Bl-9dPA</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Rhode, Paul W.</creator><creator>Strumpf, Koleman S.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990</title><author>Rhode, Paul W. ; Strumpf, Koleman S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-63433e9e98b79ddd7e85a6b6134d6f2206c880bc8143661af1deefd4195e4e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community power</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Factor mobility</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Proxies</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Regional disparities</topic><topic>Regional economics</topic><topic>Residential mobility</topic><topic>Retirement communities</topic><topic>School taxes</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhode, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strumpf, Koleman S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhode, Paul W.</au><au>Strumpf, Koleman S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1648</spage><epage>1677</epage><pages>1648-1677</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where residential choice depends solely on local public goods (the Tiebout hypothesis). We develop an extension of the Tiebout model that predicts as mobility costs fall, the heterogeneity across communities of individual public good preferences and of public good provision must (weakly) increase. Given the secular decline in mobility costs, these predictions can be evaluated using historical data. We find decreasing heterogeneity in policies and proxies for preferences across (i) a sample of U.S. municipalities (1870-1990); (ii) all Boston-area municipalities (1870-1990); and (iii) all U.S. counties (1850-1990).</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/000282803322655482</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8282
ispartof The American economic review, 2003-12, Vol.93 (5), p.1648-1677
issn 0002-8282
1944-7981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37855495
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; American Economic Association Web
subjects Automobiles
Censuses
Communities
Community
Community power
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Economic models
Economic theory
Economics
Education
Factor mobility
Game theory
Geography
Hypotheses
Income taxes
Mobility
Modeling
Municipalities
Per capita
Preferences
Proxies
Public good
Public goods
Regional disparities
Regional economics
Residential mobility
Retirement communities
School taxes
Segregation
Statistical analysis
Studies
Tax policy
Trends
title Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Importance%20of%20Tiebout%20Sorting:%20Local%20Heterogeneity%20from%201850%20to%201990&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Rhode,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1648&rft.epage=1677&rft.pages=1648-1677&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/000282803322655482&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3132146%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233032010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3132146&rfr_iscdi=true