The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941
Like her earlier account, this one is also largely immune to issues of theory. As Roy explains, her argument "relies more on empirical evidence than on theories." (11) This is unfortunate since between the publication of her first volume and this one a significant literature on racisms and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Labour (Halifax) 2005, Vol.56 (56), p.310-313 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 56 |
container_start_page | 310 |
container_title | Labour (Halifax) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Stanley, Timothy J. |
description | Like her earlier account, this one is also largely immune to issues of theory. As Roy explains, her argument "relies more on empirical evidence than on theories." (11) This is unfortunate since between the publication of her first volume and this one a significant literature on racisms and their histories has appeared in Canada, a literature that has often benefited from being theoretically informed. Consider for example, the work of Constance Backhouse on the history of legal racism in Canada or Roy Mikki's account of the Japanese Canadian redress movement. One advantage of theory is that, when used properly, it leads to asking better questions. Roy largely takes racist categories at face value, treating them much the same way her sources do, and while her sympathies are not with the racists, she occasionally falls into the kinds of binaries that underlay so much anti-Asian racism, a tendency that does a disservice to her strong claim to the empirical. For example, she provides an account of the picketing of "Chinese" potato farmers by "white" growers on the Fraser Street bridge in March 1937. The picketing resulted in an assault on a truck driver, Chung Chuck. Roy is careful to describe Chung's injuries and notes that he also inflicted a minor knife wound on a Vegetable Board inspector. The police laid charges against Chung who also charged the inspector with assault. Both sets of charges were dismissed by the courts. Roy then notes that the Chinese consul condemned the picketers and that the CCF condemned the marketing board that was trying to fix prices and whose actions had led to the confrontation in the first place. She then points out, "The Vancouver Province denied that it was 'a racial issue' but sympathized with the board's efforts to keep the market for Canadians against an 'increasing tide of ruthless Chinese competition'." (141) She seems unaware of the problematic juxtaposition between "Canadian" and "Chinese" here. It is possible that her description reproduces the terms of the Vancouver Province editorial, but if so it is curious that these categorizations warrant no discussion. By contrast, Paul Yee's Saltwater City: An Illustrated History of the Chinese in Vancouver (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre 1988) presents a rather different account of this incident, one more sensitive to the racist nature of the conflict. We learn, for example, that Chung Chuck was not merely a truck driver, but one of the main growers who had successfully challe |
format | Review |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37768528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25149632</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25149632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j165t-32430826f2d7433d6a935023eab5a1a2f150e2a691bb15f41a19b2d16c16db63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzk9LwzAYBvAgCs7pRxCCB71YyPvmTxtvMpwKkykUPJa0TV1Kl8ykE_z2VubJ03P58TzPEZmBBshEIfCYzFjOWMYLhafkLKWeMQZM5TOyLDeWrqOzfjQDfdvbNLrg7-gi-BQG15rR-Q9q6PvGjZa-GH-T6GsMX8439pZOCyIDLeCcnHRmSPbiL-ekXD6Ui6dstX58Xtyvsh6UHDOOgrMCVYdtLjhvldFcMuTW1NKAwQ4ks2iUhroG2QkwoGtsQTWg2lrxObk-1O5i-Pz9Wm1dauwwGG_DPlU8z1UhsZjg1T_Yh33007UKoci1kgwmdHlAfRpDrHbRbU38rlCC0Ioj_wF1pVt1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>218796501</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Stanley, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>Like her earlier account, this one is also largely immune to issues of theory. As Roy explains, her argument "relies more on empirical evidence than on theories." (11) This is unfortunate since between the publication of her first volume and this one a significant literature on racisms and their histories has appeared in Canada, a literature that has often benefited from being theoretically informed. Consider for example, the work of Constance Backhouse on the history of legal racism in Canada or Roy Mikki's account of the Japanese Canadian redress movement. One advantage of theory is that, when used properly, it leads to asking better questions. Roy largely takes racist categories at face value, treating them much the same way her sources do, and while her sympathies are not with the racists, she occasionally falls into the kinds of binaries that underlay so much anti-Asian racism, a tendency that does a disservice to her strong claim to the empirical. For example, she provides an account of the picketing of "Chinese" potato farmers by "white" growers on the Fraser Street bridge in March 1937. The picketing resulted in an assault on a truck driver, Chung Chuck. Roy is careful to describe Chung's injuries and notes that he also inflicted a minor knife wound on a Vegetable Board inspector. The police laid charges against Chung who also charged the inspector with assault. Both sets of charges were dismissed by the courts. Roy then notes that the Chinese consul condemned the picketers and that the CCF condemned the marketing board that was trying to fix prices and whose actions had led to the confrontation in the first place. She then points out, "The Vancouver Province denied that it was 'a racial issue' but sympathized with the board's efforts to keep the market for Canadians against an 'increasing tide of ruthless Chinese competition'." (141) She seems unaware of the problematic juxtaposition between "Canadian" and "Chinese" here. It is possible that her description reproduces the terms of the Vancouver Province editorial, but if so it is curious that these categorizations warrant no discussion. By contrast, Paul Yee's Saltwater City: An Illustrated History of the Chinese in Vancouver (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre 1988) presents a rather different account of this incident, one more sensitive to the racist nature of the conflict. We learn, for example, that Chung Chuck was not merely a truck driver, but one of the main growers who had successfully challenged the marketing broad's restrictions in the courts. (80) Yee's reproduction of the Province editorial itself shows that it represented those behind the Chinese-controlled farms as "smart young Orientals, born in Vancouver and claiming all the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship." (Yee, 83) While the editorial makes clear that these people were in the process of taking over, to the detriment of racialized whites, it appears that this Canadian/Chinese juxtaposition comes from Roy rather than the editorial itself. This in turn suggests that she rather misses the point that "the Chinese" were also "Canadian" and that an important historical question is how and why so many of their racialized "white" contemporaries did not see them as such or would not accept them even when they technically shared the same citizenship. In effect, she sees her sources as relatively straightforward descriptions of real differences rather than as artifacts of a discourse that continually created and recreated notions of racialized difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0700-3862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-4842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Committee on Canadian Labour History</publisher><subject>20th century ; Asian people ; Asians ; Canada ; Canadian history ; Chinese Canadians ; Citizenship ; Editorials ; English language ; Historical analysis ; History ; Immigration ; Japanese Canadians ; Noncitizens ; Picketing ; Race relations ; Racism ; Reviews/Comptes Rendus ; Social exclusion ; Whites ; World War I</subject><ispartof>Labour (Halifax), 2005, Vol.56 (56), p.310-313</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Canadian Committee on Labour History</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Committee on Labour History Fall 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25149632$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25149632$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941</title><title>Labour (Halifax)</title><description>Like her earlier account, this one is also largely immune to issues of theory. As Roy explains, her argument "relies more on empirical evidence than on theories." (11) This is unfortunate since between the publication of her first volume and this one a significant literature on racisms and their histories has appeared in Canada, a literature that has often benefited from being theoretically informed. Consider for example, the work of Constance Backhouse on the history of legal racism in Canada or Roy Mikki's account of the Japanese Canadian redress movement. One advantage of theory is that, when used properly, it leads to asking better questions. Roy largely takes racist categories at face value, treating them much the same way her sources do, and while her sympathies are not with the racists, she occasionally falls into the kinds of binaries that underlay so much anti-Asian racism, a tendency that does a disservice to her strong claim to the empirical. For example, she provides an account of the picketing of "Chinese" potato farmers by "white" growers on the Fraser Street bridge in March 1937. The picketing resulted in an assault on a truck driver, Chung Chuck. Roy is careful to describe Chung's injuries and notes that he also inflicted a minor knife wound on a Vegetable Board inspector. The police laid charges against Chung who also charged the inspector with assault. Both sets of charges were dismissed by the courts. Roy then notes that the Chinese consul condemned the picketers and that the CCF condemned the marketing board that was trying to fix prices and whose actions had led to the confrontation in the first place. She then points out, "The Vancouver Province denied that it was 'a racial issue' but sympathized with the board's efforts to keep the market for Canadians against an 'increasing tide of ruthless Chinese competition'." (141) She seems unaware of the problematic juxtaposition between "Canadian" and "Chinese" here. It is possible that her description reproduces the terms of the Vancouver Province editorial, but if so it is curious that these categorizations warrant no discussion. By contrast, Paul Yee's Saltwater City: An Illustrated History of the Chinese in Vancouver (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre 1988) presents a rather different account of this incident, one more sensitive to the racist nature of the conflict. We learn, for example, that Chung Chuck was not merely a truck driver, but one of the main growers who had successfully challenged the marketing broad's restrictions in the courts. (80) Yee's reproduction of the Province editorial itself shows that it represented those behind the Chinese-controlled farms as "smart young Orientals, born in Vancouver and claiming all the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship." (Yee, 83) While the editorial makes clear that these people were in the process of taking over, to the detriment of racialized whites, it appears that this Canadian/Chinese juxtaposition comes from Roy rather than the editorial itself. This in turn suggests that she rather misses the point that "the Chinese" were also "Canadian" and that an important historical question is how and why so many of their racialized "white" contemporaries did not see them as such or would not accept them even when they technically shared the same citizenship. In effect, she sees her sources as relatively straightforward descriptions of real differences rather than as artifacts of a discourse that continually created and recreated notions of racialized difference.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Canadian history</subject><subject>Chinese Canadians</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Editorials</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Japanese Canadians</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Picketing</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Reviews/Comptes Rendus</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Whites</subject><subject>World War I</subject><issn>0700-3862</issn><issn>1911-4842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzk9LwzAYBvAgCs7pRxCCB71YyPvmTxtvMpwKkykUPJa0TV1Kl8ykE_z2VubJ03P58TzPEZmBBshEIfCYzFjOWMYLhafkLKWeMQZM5TOyLDeWrqOzfjQDfdvbNLrg7-gi-BQG15rR-Q9q6PvGjZa-GH-T6GsMX8439pZOCyIDLeCcnHRmSPbiL-ekXD6Ui6dstX58Xtyvsh6UHDOOgrMCVYdtLjhvldFcMuTW1NKAwQ4ks2iUhroG2QkwoGtsQTWg2lrxObk-1O5i-Pz9Wm1dauwwGG_DPlU8z1UhsZjg1T_Yh33007UKoci1kgwmdHlAfRpDrHbRbU38rlCC0Ioj_wF1pVt1</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Stanley, Timothy J.</creator><general>Committee on Canadian Labour History</general><general>Canadian Committee on Labour History</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941</title><author>Stanley, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j165t-32430826f2d7433d6a935023eab5a1a2f150e2a691bb15f41a19b2d16c16db63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Canadian history</topic><topic>Chinese Canadians</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Editorials</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Japanese Canadians</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Picketing</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Reviews/Comptes Rendus</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Whites</topic><topic>World War I</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanley, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941</atitle><jtitle>Labour (Halifax)</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>56</issue><spage>310</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>310-313</pages><issn>0700-3862</issn><eissn>1911-4842</eissn><abstract>Like her earlier account, this one is also largely immune to issues of theory. As Roy explains, her argument "relies more on empirical evidence than on theories." (11) This is unfortunate since between the publication of her first volume and this one a significant literature on racisms and their histories has appeared in Canada, a literature that has often benefited from being theoretically informed. Consider for example, the work of Constance Backhouse on the history of legal racism in Canada or Roy Mikki's account of the Japanese Canadian redress movement. One advantage of theory is that, when used properly, it leads to asking better questions. Roy largely takes racist categories at face value, treating them much the same way her sources do, and while her sympathies are not with the racists, she occasionally falls into the kinds of binaries that underlay so much anti-Asian racism, a tendency that does a disservice to her strong claim to the empirical. For example, she provides an account of the picketing of "Chinese" potato farmers by "white" growers on the Fraser Street bridge in March 1937. The picketing resulted in an assault on a truck driver, Chung Chuck. Roy is careful to describe Chung's injuries and notes that he also inflicted a minor knife wound on a Vegetable Board inspector. The police laid charges against Chung who also charged the inspector with assault. Both sets of charges were dismissed by the courts. Roy then notes that the Chinese consul condemned the picketers and that the CCF condemned the marketing board that was trying to fix prices and whose actions had led to the confrontation in the first place. She then points out, "The Vancouver Province denied that it was 'a racial issue' but sympathized with the board's efforts to keep the market for Canadians against an 'increasing tide of ruthless Chinese competition'." (141) She seems unaware of the problematic juxtaposition between "Canadian" and "Chinese" here. It is possible that her description reproduces the terms of the Vancouver Province editorial, but if so it is curious that these categorizations warrant no discussion. By contrast, Paul Yee's Saltwater City: An Illustrated History of the Chinese in Vancouver (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre 1988) presents a rather different account of this incident, one more sensitive to the racist nature of the conflict. We learn, for example, that Chung Chuck was not merely a truck driver, but one of the main growers who had successfully challenged the marketing broad's restrictions in the courts. (80) Yee's reproduction of the Province editorial itself shows that it represented those behind the Chinese-controlled farms as "smart young Orientals, born in Vancouver and claiming all the rights and privileges of Canadian citizenship." (Yee, 83) While the editorial makes clear that these people were in the process of taking over, to the detriment of racialized whites, it appears that this Canadian/Chinese juxtaposition comes from Roy rather than the editorial itself. This in turn suggests that she rather misses the point that "the Chinese" were also "Canadian" and that an important historical question is how and why so many of their racialized "white" contemporaries did not see them as such or would not accept them even when they technically shared the same citizenship. In effect, she sees her sources as relatively straightforward descriptions of real differences rather than as artifacts of a discourse that continually created and recreated notions of racialized difference.</abstract><pub>Committee on Canadian Labour History</pub><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0700-3862 |
ispartof | Labour (Halifax), 2005, Vol.56 (56), p.310-313 |
issn | 0700-3862 1911-4842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37768528 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | 20th century Asian people Asians Canada Canadian history Chinese Canadians Citizenship Editorials English language Historical analysis History Immigration Japanese Canadians Noncitizens Picketing Race relations Racism Reviews/Comptes Rendus Social exclusion Whites World War I |
title | The Oriental Question: Consolidating a White Man's Province, 1914-1941 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Oriental%20Question:%20Consolidating%20a%20White%20Man's%20Province,%201914-1941&rft.jtitle=Labour%20(Halifax)&rft.au=Stanley,%20Timothy%20J.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=56&rft.spage=310&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=310-313&rft.issn=0700-3862&rft.eissn=1911-4842&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25149632%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218796501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25149632&rfr_iscdi=true |