EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958
The celebration of Empire Day in Britain was of greater significance than previous research has suggested. This article disproves the misconception that the festival was restricted in the main to a constituency of schoolchildren. The celebrations had a far wider effect on diverse communities; in man...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Historical journal 2006-03, Vol.49 (1), p.247-276 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 276 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | The Historical journal |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | ENGLISH, JIM |
description | The celebration of Empire Day in Britain was of greater significance than previous research has suggested. This article disproves the misconception that the festival was restricted in the main to a constituency of schoolchildren. The celebrations had a far wider effect on diverse communities; in many cases the ritual celebration of the British Empire traversed class boundaries and helped to sustain traditional social hierarchies. In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, when unrestrained jingoism became inappropriate, Empire Day retained its hegemonic potency by amalgamating the emerging traditions of sombre commemoration into the repertoire of imperial festivity. Empire Day, although remaining popular during the interwar period, became an arena of passionate contestation. The Conservative party and other groups adopted Empire Day as a vehicle for anti-socialist propaganda, whilst the communist party exploited it as an opportunity to attack British imperialism. Other protests came from local Labour groups and pacifist dissenters. The overt politicization of Empire Day severely disrupted its hegemonic function and the political battles fought over the form and purpose of the celebrations made it difficult to uphold the notion that the festival was merely a benign tribute to a legitimate and natural state of affairs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0018246X0500511X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37700973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0018246X0500511X</cupid><jstor_id>4091747</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4091747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-513119fa6fd71dfc5c28910a6742e494e600b2676c508f85aae337081910c7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OAkEQRjtGExE9gIkLwsKVo1X03_QSAWESREUWuOo0Q48BgcFuSHTnHbyhJ7HJEGI0rmrx3lf1pQg5RbhEQHn1CIBxjYkhcACOONwjJWRCRRyB7pPSBkcbfkiOvJ8CgGCAJVJt3d4n_ValWX-qJL3KdT8Z1JPeRQUVsK-PT1Q8PiYHmZl5e7KdZTK4aQ0anah7104a9W6UMhCrcIgiqsyIbCxxnKU8rcUKwQjJapYpZgXAqCakSDnEWcyNsZRKiDFIqRzRMjkv1i5d_rq2fqXnE5_a2cwsbL72mkoJoCQNYvWXOM3XbhGqaVRMcUElDxIWUupy753N9NJN5sa9awS9-Zj-87GQOSsyU7_K3S7AQKFkMuCowBO_sm87bNyLFjLc1KL9oHt92oRmN9ad4NNtBTMfucn42f4o-m-JbzF6f4o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194956375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>ENGLISH, JIM</creator><creatorcontrib>ENGLISH, JIM</creatorcontrib><description>The celebration of Empire Day in Britain was of greater significance than previous research has suggested. This article disproves the misconception that the festival was restricted in the main to a constituency of schoolchildren. The celebrations had a far wider effect on diverse communities; in many cases the ritual celebration of the British Empire traversed class boundaries and helped to sustain traditional social hierarchies. In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, when unrestrained jingoism became inappropriate, Empire Day retained its hegemonic potency by amalgamating the emerging traditions of sombre commemoration into the repertoire of imperial festivity. Empire Day, although remaining popular during the interwar period, became an arena of passionate contestation. The Conservative party and other groups adopted Empire Day as a vehicle for anti-socialist propaganda, whilst the communist party exploited it as an opportunity to attack British imperialism. Other protests came from local Labour groups and pacifist dissenters. The overt politicization of Empire Day severely disrupted its hegemonic function and the political battles fought over the form and purpose of the celebrations made it difficult to uphold the notion that the festival was merely a benign tribute to a legitimate and natural state of affairs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-246X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X0500511X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>British imperialism ; Celebrations ; Children ; Collective memory ; Conservatism ; Empires ; European history ; Festivals ; Hegemony ; Holidays & special occasions ; Imperialism ; Parties ; Political parties ; Politicization ; Politics ; Propaganda ; Social classes ; Social stratification ; United Kingdom ; World War One ; World wars</subject><ispartof>The Historical journal, 2006-03, Vol.49 (1), p.247-276</ispartof><rights>2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-513119fa6fd71dfc5c28910a6742e494e600b2676c508f85aae337081910c7b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4091747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0018246X0500511X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ENGLISH, JIM</creatorcontrib><title>EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958</title><title>The Historical journal</title><addtitle>Hist. J</addtitle><description>The celebration of Empire Day in Britain was of greater significance than previous research has suggested. This article disproves the misconception that the festival was restricted in the main to a constituency of schoolchildren. The celebrations had a far wider effect on diverse communities; in many cases the ritual celebration of the British Empire traversed class boundaries and helped to sustain traditional social hierarchies. In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, when unrestrained jingoism became inappropriate, Empire Day retained its hegemonic potency by amalgamating the emerging traditions of sombre commemoration into the repertoire of imperial festivity. Empire Day, although remaining popular during the interwar period, became an arena of passionate contestation. The Conservative party and other groups adopted Empire Day as a vehicle for anti-socialist propaganda, whilst the communist party exploited it as an opportunity to attack British imperialism. Other protests came from local Labour groups and pacifist dissenters. The overt politicization of Empire Day severely disrupted its hegemonic function and the political battles fought over the form and purpose of the celebrations made it difficult to uphold the notion that the festival was merely a benign tribute to a legitimate and natural state of affairs.</description><subject>British imperialism</subject><subject>Celebrations</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Collective memory</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Empires</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>Festivals</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Holidays & special occasions</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>Parties</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politicization</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social stratification</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>World War One</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0018-246X</issn><issn>1469-5103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OAkEQRjtGExE9gIkLwsKVo1X03_QSAWESREUWuOo0Q48BgcFuSHTnHbyhJ7HJEGI0rmrx3lf1pQg5RbhEQHn1CIBxjYkhcACOONwjJWRCRRyB7pPSBkcbfkiOvJ8CgGCAJVJt3d4n_ValWX-qJL3KdT8Z1JPeRQUVsK-PT1Q8PiYHmZl5e7KdZTK4aQ0anah7104a9W6UMhCrcIgiqsyIbCxxnKU8rcUKwQjJapYpZgXAqCakSDnEWcyNsZRKiDFIqRzRMjkv1i5d_rq2fqXnE5_a2cwsbL72mkoJoCQNYvWXOM3XbhGqaVRMcUElDxIWUupy753N9NJN5sa9awS9-Zj-87GQOSsyU7_K3S7AQKFkMuCowBO_sm87bNyLFjLc1KL9oHt92oRmN9ad4NNtBTMfucn42f4o-m-JbzF6f4o</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>ENGLISH, JIM</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958</title><author>ENGLISH, JIM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-513119fa6fd71dfc5c28910a6742e494e600b2676c508f85aae337081910c7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>British imperialism</topic><topic>Celebrations</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Collective memory</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Empires</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>Festivals</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Holidays & special occasions</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>Parties</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politicization</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social stratification</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>World War One</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ENGLISH, JIM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Historical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ENGLISH, JIM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958</atitle><jtitle>The Historical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Hist. J</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>247-276</pages><issn>0018-246X</issn><eissn>1469-5103</eissn><abstract>The celebration of Empire Day in Britain was of greater significance than previous research has suggested. This article disproves the misconception that the festival was restricted in the main to a constituency of schoolchildren. The celebrations had a far wider effect on diverse communities; in many cases the ritual celebration of the British Empire traversed class boundaries and helped to sustain traditional social hierarchies. In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, when unrestrained jingoism became inappropriate, Empire Day retained its hegemonic potency by amalgamating the emerging traditions of sombre commemoration into the repertoire of imperial festivity. Empire Day, although remaining popular during the interwar period, became an arena of passionate contestation. The Conservative party and other groups adopted Empire Day as a vehicle for anti-socialist propaganda, whilst the communist party exploited it as an opportunity to attack British imperialism. Other protests came from local Labour groups and pacifist dissenters. The overt politicization of Empire Day severely disrupted its hegemonic function and the political battles fought over the form and purpose of the celebrations made it difficult to uphold the notion that the festival was merely a benign tribute to a legitimate and natural state of affairs.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0018246X0500511X</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-246X |
ispartof | The Historical journal, 2006-03, Vol.49 (1), p.247-276 |
issn | 0018-246X 1469-5103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37700973 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | British imperialism Celebrations Children Collective memory Conservatism Empires European history Festivals Hegemony Holidays & special occasions Imperialism Parties Political parties Politicization Politics Propaganda Social classes Social stratification United Kingdom World War One World wars |
title | EMPIRE DAY IN BRITAIN, 1904–1958 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A38%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EMPIRE%20DAY%20IN%20BRITAIN,%201904%E2%80%931958&rft.jtitle=The%20Historical%20journal&rft.au=ENGLISH,%20JIM&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=247-276&rft.issn=0018-246X&rft.eissn=1469-5103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0018246X0500511X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4091747%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194956375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0018246X0500511X&rft_jstor_id=4091747&rfr_iscdi=true |