The Committee Function: An Influence Equation

The Committee Function: An Influence Equation

In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review 1972-03, Vol.66 (1), p.160-162
1. Verfasser: Casstevens, Thomas W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Committees
Congressional committees
Expected values
Legislative power
Mathematical functions
U.S.A
Voting
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 160
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 66
creator Casstevens, Thomas W.
description In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a mathematical model of the relationship between the relevant committee's divisions on the floor and a motion's probability of passing. Let x be the proportion of the relevant committee voting yea on the floor, z be the proportion of the relevant committee voting nay on the floor, and y be the proportion of the relevant committee neither voting yea nor voting nay on the floor, then a motion's probability of passing is (x2 + y2)/(x2 + y2 + z2). The fit between theory and observation is quite good: six hundred eleven roll calls from the 90th and 91st Congresses have been analyzed; 0.628 of the motions actually passed; and 0.613 of the motions were expected to pass.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1959284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37653583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_1959284</cupid><jstor_id>1959284</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1959284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e828ca1a1b915d1c46fbd9aeb4559cb4da5776ea3788ec6f0f5061d95b156883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90FFLwzAQB_AgCs4pfoWCovhQTZZck_g2xqaDgS_zOaTpVTvadEvaB7-9HduD7MGn444f_zuOkFtGnyecyhemQU-UOCMjBlymoAU_JyNKKU8pgLgkVzFuhpYyqkYkXX9jMmubpuo6xGTRe9dVrX9Npj5Z-rLu0TtM5rve7sfX5KK0dcSbYx2Tz8V8PXtPVx9vy9l0lTouZJcCqolyllmWawYFcyIr80JbzAWAdrkoLEiZoeVSKXRZSUugGSs05AwypfiYPBxyt6Hd9Rg701TRYV1bj20fDZcZcFB8gHcncNP2wQ-3GcapkEoPuYN6PCgX2hgDlmYbqsaGH8Oo2T_NHJ82yPuD3MSuDf-wp2OgbfJQFV_4Z--J_QX3k3QW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304789061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Committee Function: An Influence Equation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Casstevens, Thomas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casstevens, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><description>In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a mathematical model of the relationship between the relevant committee's divisions on the floor and a motion's probability of passing. Let x be the proportion of the relevant committee voting yea on the floor, z be the proportion of the relevant committee voting nay on the floor, and y be the proportion of the relevant committee neither voting yea nor voting nay on the floor, then a motion's probability of passing is (x2 + y2)/(x2 + y2 + z2). The fit between theory and observation is quite good: six hundred eleven roll calls from the 90th and 91st Congresses have been analyzed; 0.628 of the motions actually passed; and 0.613 of the motions were expected to pass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1959284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Committees ; Congressional committees ; Expected values ; Legislative power ; Mathematical functions ; U.S.A ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 1972-03, Vol.66 (1), p.160-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1972</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e828ca1a1b915d1c46fbd9aeb4559cb4da5776ea3788ec6f0f5061d95b156883</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1959284$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1959284$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casstevens, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><title>The Committee Function: An Influence Equation</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a mathematical model of the relationship between the relevant committee's divisions on the floor and a motion's probability of passing. Let x be the proportion of the relevant committee voting yea on the floor, z be the proportion of the relevant committee voting nay on the floor, and y be the proportion of the relevant committee neither voting yea nor voting nay on the floor, then a motion's probability of passing is (x2 + y2)/(x2 + y2 + z2). The fit between theory and observation is quite good: six hundred eleven roll calls from the 90th and 91st Congresses have been analyzed; 0.628 of the motions actually passed; and 0.613 of the motions were expected to pass.</description><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Congressional committees</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Legislative power</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp90FFLwzAQB_AgCs4pfoWCovhQTZZck_g2xqaDgS_zOaTpVTvadEvaB7-9HduD7MGn444f_zuOkFtGnyecyhemQU-UOCMjBlymoAU_JyNKKU8pgLgkVzFuhpYyqkYkXX9jMmubpuo6xGTRe9dVrX9Npj5Z-rLu0TtM5rve7sfX5KK0dcSbYx2Tz8V8PXtPVx9vy9l0lTouZJcCqolyllmWawYFcyIr80JbzAWAdrkoLEiZoeVSKXRZSUugGSs05AwypfiYPBxyt6Hd9Rg701TRYV1bj20fDZcZcFB8gHcncNP2wQ-3GcapkEoPuYN6PCgX2hgDlmYbqsaGH8Oo2T_NHJ82yPuD3MSuDf-wp2OgbfJQFV_4Z--J_QX3k3QW</recordid><startdate>19720301</startdate><enddate>19720301</enddate><creator>Casstevens, Thomas W.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>The American Political Science Association</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720301</creationdate><title>The Committee Function: An Influence Equation</title><author>Casstevens, Thomas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5e828ca1a1b915d1c46fbd9aeb4559cb4da5776ea3788ec6f0f5061d95b156883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Congressional committees</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Legislative power</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casstevens, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casstevens, Thomas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Committee Function: An Influence Equation</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>1972-03-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>160-162</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>In legislative systems a bill is commonly considered and reported by an appropriate committee before it is considered on the floor of the house. Since motions on the floor frequently relate to such bills, it is often apposite to refer to a motion's relevant committee. This article presents a mathematical model of the relationship between the relevant committee's divisions on the floor and a motion's probability of passing. Let x be the proportion of the relevant committee voting yea on the floor, z be the proportion of the relevant committee voting nay on the floor, and y be the proportion of the relevant committee neither voting yea nor voting nay on the floor, then a motion's probability of passing is (x2 + y2)/(x2 + y2 + z2). The fit between theory and observation is quite good: six hundred eleven roll calls from the 90th and 91st Congresses have been analyzed; 0.628 of the motions actually passed; and 0.613 of the motions were expected to pass.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1959284</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 1972-03, Vol.66 (1), p.160-162
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37653583
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Committees
Congressional committees
Expected values
Legislative power
Mathematical functions
U.S.A
Voting
title The Committee Function: An Influence Equation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A46%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Committee%20Function:%20An%20Influence%20Equation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Casstevens,%20Thomas%20W.&rft.date=1972-03-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=160-162&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1959284&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1959284%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304789061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_1959284&rft_jstor_id=1959284&rfr_iscdi=true