The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly
The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10%...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of finance (New York) 1992-09, Vol.47 (4), p.1605-1621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1621 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1605 |
container_title | The Journal of finance (New York) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | AGRAWAL, ANUP JAFFE, JEFFREY F. MANDELKER, GERSHON N. |
description | The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10% over the five-year post-merger period, a result robust to various specifications. Our evidence suggests that neither the firm size effect nor beta estimation problems are the cause of the negative post-merger returns. We examine whether this result is caused by a slow adjustment of the market to the merger event. Our results do not seem consistent with this hypothesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37405170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2328956</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2328956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5164-ae1d04ddde329eec0c6a97ae8d87647cab8d384df8b195fe3022c8556045199d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhO0QFcUvwfzs9sVqxS1FpFyhC4mJ5nUlxSOLWzordb4-jVBVC4sAc7JH8e0_jeVl2ilGJU71pS8wZKgQRuMRVRcpxh5iQrDw8yhYPT4-zBUKEFBgp8jR7FmOLpuJ8kV1e_4B86-NYfIRwAyHfQmh86M1gIfdNvrR3exfccJOvXejjWb7MP0MBB9O7wYzODxNkhnw5-N50x-fZk8Z0EV7c3yfZ1_W769X74uJqc75aXhSWY8EKA7hGrK5roKQCsMgKU0kDqlZSMGnNTtVUsbpRO1zxBmia3irOBWI8fbOmJ9nr2fc2-Ls9xFH3LlroOjOA30dNJUMcS5TA07_A1u_DkGbTuGISKUZ5gl7-EyKVxEyRSiXqbKZs8DEGaPRtcL0JR42RntLQrZ5WrqeV6ykNfZ-GPiTx21n8y3Vw_A-l_nC1Pp_aZPFqtmjj6MOfFoQimQ6iKi4SVsyYiyMcHjATfmohqeT62-VGb9GGfvqCvusV_Q2JVKp7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297148298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>AGRAWAL, ANUP ; JAFFE, JEFFREY F. ; MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</creator><creatorcontrib>AGRAWAL, ANUP ; JAFFE, JEFFREY F. ; MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</creatorcontrib><description>The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10% over the five-year post-merger period, a result robust to various specifications. Our evidence suggests that neither the firm size effect nor beta estimation problems are the cause of the negative post-merger returns. We examine whether this result is caused by a slow adjustment of the market to the merger event. Our results do not seem consistent with this hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLFIAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Business structures ; Efficient markets ; Financial economics ; Portfolio performance ; Return on investment ; Shareholders ; Shareholders wealth ; Shorter Papers ; Statistical significance ; Stock exchanges ; Stock prices ; Studies ; Target acquisitions ; Tender offers ; Value weighted index</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 1992-09, Vol.47 (4), p.1605-1621</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1992 American Finance Association</rights><rights>1992 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Sep 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5164-ae1d04ddde329eec0c6a97ae8d87647cab8d384df8b195fe3022c8556045199d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5164-ae1d04ddde329eec0c6a97ae8d87647cab8d384df8b195fe3022c8556045199d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2328956$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2328956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27848,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AGRAWAL, ANUP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAFFE, JEFFREY F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</creatorcontrib><title>The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10% over the five-year post-merger period, a result robust to various specifications. Our evidence suggests that neither the firm size effect nor beta estimation problems are the cause of the negative post-merger returns. We examine whether this result is caused by a slow adjustment of the market to the merger event. Our results do not seem consistent with this hypothesis.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Efficient markets</subject><subject>Financial economics</subject><subject>Portfolio performance</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Shareholders</subject><subject>Shareholders wealth</subject><subject>Shorter Papers</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Target acquisitions</subject><subject>Tender offers</subject><subject>Value weighted index</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhO0QFcUvwfzs9sVqxS1FpFyhC4mJ5nUlxSOLWzordb4-jVBVC4sAc7JH8e0_jeVl2ilGJU71pS8wZKgQRuMRVRcpxh5iQrDw8yhYPT4-zBUKEFBgp8jR7FmOLpuJ8kV1e_4B86-NYfIRwAyHfQmh86M1gIfdNvrR3exfccJOvXejjWb7MP0MBB9O7wYzODxNkhnw5-N50x-fZk8Z0EV7c3yfZ1_W769X74uJqc75aXhSWY8EKA7hGrK5roKQCsMgKU0kDqlZSMGnNTtVUsbpRO1zxBmia3irOBWI8fbOmJ9nr2fc2-Ls9xFH3LlroOjOA30dNJUMcS5TA07_A1u_DkGbTuGISKUZ5gl7-EyKVxEyRSiXqbKZs8DEGaPRtcL0JR42RntLQrZ5WrqeV6ykNfZ-GPiTx21n8y3Vw_A-l_nC1Pp_aZPFqtmjj6MOfFoQimQ6iKi4SVsyYiyMcHjATfmohqeT62-VGb9GGfvqCvusV_Q2JVKp7</recordid><startdate>199209</startdate><enddate>199209</enddate><creator>AGRAWAL, ANUP</creator><creator>JAFFE, JEFFREY F.</creator><creator>MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Finance Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199209</creationdate><title>The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly</title><author>AGRAWAL, ANUP ; JAFFE, JEFFREY F. ; MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5164-ae1d04ddde329eec0c6a97ae8d87647cab8d384df8b195fe3022c8556045199d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Efficient markets</topic><topic>Financial economics</topic><topic>Portfolio performance</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Shareholders</topic><topic>Shareholders wealth</topic><topic>Shorter Papers</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Target acquisitions</topic><topic>Tender offers</topic><topic>Value weighted index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AGRAWAL, ANUP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAFFE, JEFFREY F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AGRAWAL, ANUP</au><au>JAFFE, JEFFREY F.</au><au>MANDELKER, GERSHON N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>1992-09</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1605</spage><epage>1621</epage><pages>1605-1621</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><coden>JLFIAN</coden><abstract>The existing literature on the post-merger performance of acquiring firms is divided. We re-examine this issue, using a nearly exhaustive sample of mergers between NYSE acquirers and NYSE/AMEX targets. We find that stockholders of acquiring firms suffer a statistically significant loss of about 10% over the five-year post-merger period, a result robust to various specifications. Our evidence suggests that neither the firm size effect nor beta estimation problems are the cause of the negative post-merger returns. We examine whether this result is caused by a slow adjustment of the market to the merger event. Our results do not seem consistent with this hypothesis.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1082 |
ispartof | The Journal of finance (New York), 1992-09, Vol.47 (4), p.1605-1621 |
issn | 0022-1082 1540-6261 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37405170 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Business structures Efficient markets Financial economics Portfolio performance Return on investment Shareholders Shareholders wealth Shorter Papers Statistical significance Stock exchanges Stock prices Studies Target acquisitions Tender offers Value weighted index |
title | The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T18%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Post-Merger%20Performance%20of%20Acquiring%20Firms:%20A%20Re-examination%20of%20an%20Anomaly&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=AGRAWAL,%20ANUP&rft.date=1992-09&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1605&rft.epage=1621&rft.pages=1605-1621&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft.coden=JLFIAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04674.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2328956%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297148298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2328956&rfr_iscdi=true |