Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez
United States Supreme Court rulings on the reasonableness of third-party consent to warrantless searches have focused on the consentor's degree of possessory control over the place of search. The authors predicted that (1) laypersons perceive as reasonable third-party consentors only those indi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of research in crime and delinquency 1992-05, Vol.29 (2), p.217-228 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 228 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 217 |
| container_title | The journal of research in crime and delinquency |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K. LAUFER, WILLIAM S. TAYLOR, RALPH B. |
| description | United States Supreme Court rulings on the reasonableness of third-party consent to warrantless searches have focused on the consentor's degree of possessory control over the place of search. The authors predicted that (1) laypersons perceive as reasonable third-party consentors only those individuals having high control over the place of search and a close social relationship with the target-person of the search (suspect); and (b) police detectives' perceptions of reasonable third-party consentors would fall intermediately between lay and legal perceptions as expressed in the caselaw. Forty-eight undergraduates and 35 police detectives were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. Two levels of third party's control over the place of search (low or high) were crossed with two levels of third party's social relationship with the target person of search (low or high). As predicted, lay perceptions regarding reasonable third-party consentors involve a more restricted range of people than legal perceptions. Contrary to expectation, police detectives' perceptions closely correspond with lay perceptions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022427892029002007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37373027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022427892029002007</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1292228704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-693e31d30b2ab68d1bccb509799b416b1002ce35d0f888a3b0439acc626c67003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOKefwJeA4lvnTbI2yaMM_8FAmRN8sqRpqpGazKQV9NObsiEiYvIQbvidcw8chA4JTAjh_BSA0inlQlKgMg0AfAuNSJ7TjDPysI1GA5ENyC7ai_EF0qGiGKHHO6-tavGtCdqsOutdxL7By2cb6uxWhe4Dz9KfcR1Wrsbds8ELo6J3qmqNMzHipYndILluW-u8jfh9ghe-DvapN5_7aKdRbTQHm3eM7i_Ol7OrbH5zeT07m2eaEdllhWSGkZpBRVVViJpUWlc5SC5lNSVFRVJabVheQyOEUKyCKZNK64IWuuAAbIxO1r6r4N_6lKh8tVGbtlXO-D6WjKcLlCfw6Bf44vvgUraSSCEoY5KJfykqKaWCpwRjxNaUDj7GYJpyFeyrCh8lgXLopfyjl6Q63nirqFXbBOW0jd_SPHkTYAmDNRbVk_mx_h_nLwc9l9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292228704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K. ; LAUFER, WILLIAM S. ; TAYLOR, RALPH B.</creator><creatorcontrib>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K. ; LAUFER, WILLIAM S. ; TAYLOR, RALPH B.</creatorcontrib><description>United States Supreme Court rulings on the reasonableness of third-party consent to warrantless searches have focused on the consentor's degree of possessory control over the place of search. The authors predicted that (1) laypersons perceive as reasonable third-party consentors only those individuals having high control over the place of search and a close social relationship with the target-person of the search (suspect); and (b) police detectives' perceptions of reasonable third-party consentors would fall intermediately between lay and legal perceptions as expressed in the caselaw. Forty-eight undergraduates and 35 police detectives were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. Two levels of third party's control over the place of search (low or high) were crossed with two levels of third party's social relationship with the target person of search (low or high). As predicted, lay perceptions regarding reasonable third-party consentors involve a more restricted range of people than legal perceptions. Contrary to expectation, police detectives' perceptions closely correspond with lay perceptions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-731X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022427892029002007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRCDB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE PUBLICATIONS</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Consent ; Court decisions ; Detectives ; Forensic psychiatry ; Laypersons ; Medical sciences ; Police ; Policing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Social perception ; Supreme courts ; Third party ; Undergraduate students</subject><ispartof>The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 1992-05, Vol.29 (2), p.217-228</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-693e31d30b2ab68d1bccb509799b416b1002ce35d0f888a3b0439acc626c67003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-693e31d30b2ab68d1bccb509799b416b1002ce35d0f888a3b0439acc626c67003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022427892029002007$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022427892029002007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5287103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAUFER, WILLIAM S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, RALPH B.</creatorcontrib><title>Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez</title><title>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</title><description>United States Supreme Court rulings on the reasonableness of third-party consent to warrantless searches have focused on the consentor's degree of possessory control over the place of search. The authors predicted that (1) laypersons perceive as reasonable third-party consentors only those individuals having high control over the place of search and a close social relationship with the target-person of the search (suspect); and (b) police detectives' perceptions of reasonable third-party consentors would fall intermediately between lay and legal perceptions as expressed in the caselaw. Forty-eight undergraduates and 35 police detectives were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. Two levels of third party's control over the place of search (low or high) were crossed with two levels of third party's social relationship with the target person of search (low or high). As predicted, lay perceptions regarding reasonable third-party consentors involve a more restricted range of people than legal perceptions. Contrary to expectation, police detectives' perceptions closely correspond with lay perceptions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Detectives</subject><subject>Forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>Laypersons</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Social perception</subject><subject>Supreme courts</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><issn>0022-4278</issn><issn>1552-731X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOKefwJeA4lvnTbI2yaMM_8FAmRN8sqRpqpGazKQV9NObsiEiYvIQbvidcw8chA4JTAjh_BSA0inlQlKgMg0AfAuNSJ7TjDPysI1GA5ENyC7ai_EF0qGiGKHHO6-tavGtCdqsOutdxL7By2cb6uxWhe4Dz9KfcR1Wrsbds8ELo6J3qmqNMzHipYndILluW-u8jfh9ghe-DvapN5_7aKdRbTQHm3eM7i_Ol7OrbH5zeT07m2eaEdllhWSGkZpBRVVViJpUWlc5SC5lNSVFRVJabVheQyOEUKyCKZNK64IWuuAAbIxO1r6r4N_6lKh8tVGbtlXO-D6WjKcLlCfw6Bf44vvgUraSSCEoY5KJfykqKaWCpwRjxNaUDj7GYJpyFeyrCh8lgXLopfyjl6Q63nirqFXbBOW0jd_SPHkTYAmDNRbVk_mx_h_nLwc9l9Q</recordid><startdate>199205</startdate><enddate>199205</enddate><creator>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K.</creator><creator>LAUFER, WILLIAM S.</creator><creator>TAYLOR, RALPH B.</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199205</creationdate><title>Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez</title><author>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K. ; LAUFER, WILLIAM S. ; TAYLOR, RALPH B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-693e31d30b2ab68d1bccb509799b416b1002ce35d0f888a3b0439acc626c67003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Detectives</topic><topic>Forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>Laypersons</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Social perception</topic><topic>Supreme courts</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAUFER, WILLIAM S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, RALPH B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KAGEHIRO, DOROTHY K.</au><au>LAUFER, WILLIAM S.</au><au>TAYLOR, RALPH B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>1992-05</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>217-228</pages><issn>0022-4278</issn><eissn>1552-731X</eissn><coden>JRCDB2</coden><abstract>United States Supreme Court rulings on the reasonableness of third-party consent to warrantless searches have focused on the consentor's degree of possessory control over the place of search. The authors predicted that (1) laypersons perceive as reasonable third-party consentors only those individuals having high control over the place of search and a close social relationship with the target-person of the search (suspect); and (b) police detectives' perceptions of reasonable third-party consentors would fall intermediately between lay and legal perceptions as expressed in the caselaw. Forty-eight undergraduates and 35 police detectives were randomly assigned to experimental conditions. Two levels of third party's control over the place of search (low or high) were crossed with two levels of third party's social relationship with the target person of search (low or high). As predicted, lay perceptions regarding reasonable third-party consentors involve a more restricted range of people than legal perceptions. Contrary to expectation, police detectives' perceptions closely correspond with lay perceptions.</abstract><cop>Beverly Hills, CA</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS</pub><doi>10.1177/0022427892029002007</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4278 |
| ispartof | The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 1992-05, Vol.29 (2), p.217-228 |
| issn | 0022-4278 1552-731X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37373027 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Consent Court decisions Detectives Forensic psychiatry Laypersons Medical sciences Police Policing Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Social perception Supreme courts Third party Undergraduate students |
| title | Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Perceptions%20of%20Third-Party%20Consent%20and%20the%20Reasonableness%20Test%20of%20Illinois%20v.%20Rodriguez&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20in%20crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=KAGEHIRO,%20DOROTHY%20K.&rft.date=1992-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=217-228&rft.issn=0022-4278&rft.eissn=1552-731X&rft.coden=JRCDB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022427892029002007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1292228704%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292228704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022427892029002007&rfr_iscdi=true |