Myths and myth-making in the European Union

EU competition policy has become so strongly institutionalized that it is easy to overlook its precarious status in earlier decades. This article argues, first, that the Commission responded to the imperative arising from the extraordinary powers created by the treaty and the novelty of competition...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of common market studies 2010-01, Vol.48 (1), p.111-132
Hauptverfasser: Akman, Pinar, Kassim, Hussein
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Journal of common market studies
container_volume 48
creator Akman, Pinar
Kassim, Hussein
description EU competition policy has become so strongly institutionalized that it is easy to overlook its precarious status in earlier decades. This article argues, first, that the Commission responded to the imperative arising from the extraordinary powers created by the treaty and the novelty of competition policy in post-war Europe by developing a series of myths to provide justification for its prerogatives. Second, these myths have played a key role in securing acceptance of EU policy, though other factors have also been important. Third, the official mythology has been supplemented by an interpretation which has become dominant in the law and political science literatures; namely, that EU competition policy has ordoliberal origins. This article challenges this view. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37306982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37306982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_373069823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0sDDjYOAqLs4yMDAwNDUw5WTQ9q0syShWSMxLUcgFsnRzE7Mz89IVMvMUSjJSFVxLi_ILUhPzFELzMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5qba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxvLG5sYGZpYWRMdEKARetM4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37306982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myths and myth-making in the European Union</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Akman, Pinar ; Kassim, Hussein</creator><creatorcontrib>Akman, Pinar ; Kassim, Hussein</creatorcontrib><description>EU competition policy has become so strongly institutionalized that it is easy to overlook its precarious status in earlier decades. This article argues, first, that the Commission responded to the imperative arising from the extraordinary powers created by the treaty and the novelty of competition policy in post-war Europe by developing a series of myths to provide justification for its prerogatives. Second, these myths have played a key role in securing acceptance of EU policy, though other factors have also been important. Third, the official mythology has been supplemented by an interpretation which has become dominant in the law and political science literatures; namely, that EU competition policy has ordoliberal origins. This article challenges this view. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Common market ; Economic incentives ; Europe ; European Union ; Globalization ; International relations ; International trade ; Trade associations</subject><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2010-01, Vol.48 (1), p.111-132</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akman, Pinar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassim, Hussein</creatorcontrib><title>Myths and myth-making in the European Union</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description>EU competition policy has become so strongly institutionalized that it is easy to overlook its precarious status in earlier decades. This article argues, first, that the Commission responded to the imperative arising from the extraordinary powers created by the treaty and the novelty of competition policy in post-war Europe by developing a series of myths to provide justification for its prerogatives. Second, these myths have played a key role in securing acceptance of EU policy, though other factors have also been important. Third, the official mythology has been supplemented by an interpretation which has become dominant in the law and political science literatures; namely, that EU competition policy has ordoliberal origins. This article challenges this view. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</description><subject>Common market</subject><subject>Economic incentives</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Trade associations</subject><issn>0021-9886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0sDDjYOAqLs4yMDAwNDUw5WTQ9q0syShWSMxLUcgFsnRzE7Mz89IVMvMUSjJSFVxLi_ILUhPzFELzMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5qba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxvLG5sYGZpYWRMdEKARetM4E</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Akman, Pinar</creator><creator>Kassim, Hussein</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Myths and myth-making in the European Union</title><author>Akman, Pinar ; Kassim, Hussein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_373069823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Common market</topic><topic>Economic incentives</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Trade associations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akman, Pinar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassim, Hussein</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akman, Pinar</au><au>Kassim, Hussein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myths and myth-making in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>111-132</pages><issn>0021-9886</issn><abstract>EU competition policy has become so strongly institutionalized that it is easy to overlook its precarious status in earlier decades. This article argues, first, that the Commission responded to the imperative arising from the extraordinary powers created by the treaty and the novelty of competition policy in post-war Europe by developing a series of myths to provide justification for its prerogatives. Second, these myths have played a key role in securing acceptance of EU policy, though other factors have also been important. Third, the official mythology has been supplemented by an interpretation which has become dominant in the law and political science literatures; namely, that EU competition policy has ordoliberal origins. This article challenges this view. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9886
ispartof Journal of common market studies, 2010-01, Vol.48 (1), p.111-132
issn 0021-9886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37306982
source EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Common market
Economic incentives
Europe
European Union
Globalization
International relations
International trade
Trade associations
title Myths and myth-making in the European Union
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myths%20and%20myth-making%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Akman,%20Pinar&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=111-132&rft.issn=0021-9886&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E37306982%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37306982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true