Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation

In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy economics 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162
Hauptverfasser: van Vliet, Jasper, den Elzen, Michel G.J., van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S162
container_issue Supp.
container_start_page S152
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 31
creator van Vliet, Jasper
den Elzen, Michel G.J.
van Vuuren, Detlef P.
description In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m 2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37280683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014098830900108X</els_id><sourcerecordid>37280683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAURi0EEqXwC1gyIZaE6zz8GDqgipdUxAKz5d5cV67SJNhppf57UspcMV3p6pxvOIzdcsg4cPGwzqgl7LIcQGcgMuBwxiZcySIVXPFzNgFeQqqVKi7ZVYxrAKhEpSZs9k40-HaVBFt7O_gdJa4LePgMNqxoiMm2rSkkNTV2T3XS2zB49P3Idu01u3C2iXTzd6fs6_npc_6aLj5e3uaPixRLwYfU1VIKWVROcitRllpoAUKg03yZV8tSu2VVCo2uLLUErJfgBBaoc8RS26oqpuzuuNuH7ntLcTAbH5GaxrbUbaMpZK5AqOI_YJVLdVi8PwlyLrkaN3U-osURxdDFGMiZPviNDXvDwRzym7X5zW8O-Q0IM-YfrdnRorHLzlMwET21SLUPhIOpO3_S_wHiC45K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171880692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m 2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomass energy ; Carbon emissions ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Cost analysis ; Energy economics ; Integrated assessment model ; International cooperation ; Modelling ; Overshoot scenarios ; Participation regimes ; Pollution control ; Radiation ; Strategic planning</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m 2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</description><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Integrated assessment model</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Overshoot scenarios</subject><subject>Participation regimes</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAURi0EEqXwC1gyIZaE6zz8GDqgipdUxAKz5d5cV67SJNhppf57UspcMV3p6pxvOIzdcsg4cPGwzqgl7LIcQGcgMuBwxiZcySIVXPFzNgFeQqqVKi7ZVYxrAKhEpSZs9k40-HaVBFt7O_gdJa4LePgMNqxoiMm2rSkkNTV2T3XS2zB49P3Idu01u3C2iXTzd6fs6_npc_6aLj5e3uaPixRLwYfU1VIKWVROcitRllpoAUKg03yZV8tSu2VVCo2uLLUErJfgBBaoc8RS26oqpuzuuNuH7ntLcTAbH5GaxrbUbaMpZK5AqOI_YJVLdVi8PwlyLrkaN3U-osURxdDFGMiZPviNDXvDwRzym7X5zW8O-Q0IM-YfrdnRorHLzlMwET21SLUPhIOpO3_S_wHiC45K</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>van Vliet, Jasper</creator><creator>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><author>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Integrated assessment model</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Overshoot scenarios</topic><topic>Participation regimes</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Vliet, Jasper</au><au>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>Supp.</issue><spage>S152</spage><epage>S162</epage><pages>S152-S162</pages><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m 2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37280683
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biomass energy
Carbon emissions
Climate
Climate change
Climate policy
Cost analysis
Energy economics
Integrated assessment model
International cooperation
Modelling
Overshoot scenarios
Participation regimes
Pollution control
Radiation
Strategic planning
title Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meeting%20radiative%20forcing%20targets%20under%20delayed%20participation&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=van%20Vliet,%20Jasper&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=Supp.&rft.spage=S152&rft.epage=S162&rft.pages=S152-S162&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37280683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171880692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S014098830900108X&rfr_iscdi=true