Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation
In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m 2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy economics 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S162 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supp. |
container_start_page | S152 |
container_title | Energy economics |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | van Vliet, Jasper den Elzen, Michel G.J. van Vuuren, Detlef P. |
description | In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m
2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m
2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37280683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014098830900108X</els_id><sourcerecordid>37280683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAURi0EEqXwC1gyIZaE6zz8GDqgipdUxAKz5d5cV67SJNhppf57UspcMV3p6pxvOIzdcsg4cPGwzqgl7LIcQGcgMuBwxiZcySIVXPFzNgFeQqqVKi7ZVYxrAKhEpSZs9k40-HaVBFt7O_gdJa4LePgMNqxoiMm2rSkkNTV2T3XS2zB49P3Idu01u3C2iXTzd6fs6_npc_6aLj5e3uaPixRLwYfU1VIKWVROcitRllpoAUKg03yZV8tSu2VVCo2uLLUErJfgBBaoc8RS26oqpuzuuNuH7ntLcTAbH5GaxrbUbaMpZK5AqOI_YJVLdVi8PwlyLrkaN3U-osURxdDFGMiZPviNDXvDwRzym7X5zW8O-Q0IM-YfrdnRorHLzlMwET21SLUPhIOpO3_S_wHiC45K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171880692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m
2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m
2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomass energy ; Carbon emissions ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Cost analysis ; Energy economics ; Integrated assessment model ; International cooperation ; Modelling ; Overshoot scenarios ; Participation regimes ; Pollution control ; Radiation ; Strategic planning</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m
2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m
2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</description><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Integrated assessment model</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Overshoot scenarios</subject><subject>Participation regimes</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAURi0EEqXwC1gyIZaE6zz8GDqgipdUxAKz5d5cV67SJNhppf57UspcMV3p6pxvOIzdcsg4cPGwzqgl7LIcQGcgMuBwxiZcySIVXPFzNgFeQqqVKi7ZVYxrAKhEpSZs9k40-HaVBFt7O_gdJa4LePgMNqxoiMm2rSkkNTV2T3XS2zB49P3Idu01u3C2iXTzd6fs6_npc_6aLj5e3uaPixRLwYfU1VIKWVROcitRllpoAUKg03yZV8tSu2VVCo2uLLUErJfgBBaoc8RS26oqpuzuuNuH7ntLcTAbH5GaxrbUbaMpZK5AqOI_YJVLdVi8PwlyLrkaN3U-osURxdDFGMiZPviNDXvDwRzym7X5zW8O-Q0IM-YfrdnRorHLzlMwET21SLUPhIOpO3_S_wHiC45K</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>van Vliet, Jasper</creator><creator>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</title><author>van Vliet, Jasper ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fd776735f71a7c749696066cf91b25b49fb5469cf44970cdb0f6c3c92cc49a553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Integrated assessment model</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Overshoot scenarios</topic><topic>Participation regimes</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Vliet, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Vliet, Jasper</au><au>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>Supp.</issue><spage>S152</spage><epage>S162</epage><pages>S152-S162</pages><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>In this article we explore several scenarios that aim at meeting radiative forcing targets at 4.5, 3.7, 2.9 and 2.6 W/m
2 by 2100. These scenarios are run under the assumption of participation of all countries by 2012 in climate policy and under the assumption of a significant delay in the participation of Russia and non-Annex I countries (up to 2030 and 2050). The study finds the lowest radiative forcing categories to be feasible under full participation, certainly if overshoot of targets is allowed and when bio-energy and carbon-capture-and-storage is added to the mitigation portfolio. In cases with severe delay in participation, the lowest targets become infeasible. For less strict targets (e.g. 3.7 W/m
2), delayed participation leads to considerable costs increases (up to 90% for the stabilisation case). As a next step, scenarios with less delay in participation need to be explored.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-9883 |
ispartof | Energy economics, 2009-01, Vol.31 (Supp.), p.S152-S162 |
issn | 0140-9883 1873-6181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37280683 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biomass energy Carbon emissions Climate Climate change Climate policy Cost analysis Energy economics Integrated assessment model International cooperation Modelling Overshoot scenarios Participation regimes Pollution control Radiation Strategic planning |
title | Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meeting%20radiative%20forcing%20targets%20under%20delayed%20participation&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=van%20Vliet,%20Jasper&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=Supp.&rft.spage=S152&rft.epage=S162&rft.pages=S152-S162&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37280683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171880692&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S014098830900108X&rfr_iscdi=true |