Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case
The Korean government plans to increase strategically focused R&D investment in some promising nuclear technology areas to create export opportunities of technology in a global nuclear market. The purpose of this paper is to present a decision support process for selecting promising nuclear tech...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2010, Vol.38 (1), p.161-167 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 167 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 161 |
| container_title | Energy policy |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Lee, Deok Joo Hwang, Jooho |
| description | The Korean government plans to increase strategically focused R&D investment in some promising nuclear technology areas to create export opportunities of technology in a global nuclear market. The purpose of this paper is to present a decision support process for selecting promising nuclear technology with the perspective of exportability by using the AHP based on extensive data gathered from nuclear experts in Korea. In this study, the decision criteria for evaluating the export competitiveness of nuclear technologies were determined, and a hierarchical structure for the decision-making process was systematically developed. Subsequently relative weights of decision criteria were derived using AHP methodology and the export competitiveness of nuclear technology alternatives was quantified to prioritize them. We discuss the implications of our results with a viewpoint toward national nuclear technology policy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.069 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37229927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421509006533</els_id><sourcerecordid>21171606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-30bb42e87de6c8271c6f0aa4d987c2dcfc318d2ddd8f7577838e492ab87595c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEEkvhE3CxkOCW4D9J7CBxqAq0QCUucLa8k0njldcOdlI13x6HrXrgQC2NR7J-8_zk56J4zWjFKGvfHyr0U3AVp7SrqKpo2z0pdkxJUbZSyqfFjgrKypqz5nnxIqUDpbRWXb0rpk8INtngSVqmKcSZDCGShA5htv6G4N12aPYOiV_AoYlkRhh9cOFmJUvamHlEYrxx62yBjBajiTCuZIoBMKUP5Jx8DxGNJ2ASviyeDcYlfHXfz4pfXz7_vLgqr39cfr04vy6hpe1cCrrf1xyV7LEFxSWDdqDG1H2nJPAeBhBM9bzvezXIRkolFNYdN3slm64BJs6KdyfdbOP3gmnWR5sAnTMew5K0kJx3HZePgw3jrcoXPAZyxiTL5jP45h_wEJaYHygztBFcUr75EycIYkgp4qCnaI8mrppRvYWqD_pvqHoLVVOlc6h56ttpKuKE8DCCeXnc4FstjFB5W3NxmrWEsblYrmnrLdOslXqcj1ns7b1Pk8C4IRqf_8KDKOdc1EqJzH08cZjzus356gQWPWBvY_4mug_2v6b_AL8g0vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205327021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lee, Deok Joo ; Hwang, Jooho</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Deok Joo ; Hwang, Jooho</creatorcontrib><description>The Korean government plans to increase strategically focused R&D investment in some promising nuclear technology areas to create export opportunities of technology in a global nuclear market. The purpose of this paper is to present a decision support process for selecting promising nuclear technology with the perspective of exportability by using the AHP based on extensive data gathered from nuclear experts in Korea. In this study, the decision criteria for evaluating the export competitiveness of nuclear technologies were determined, and a hierarchical structure for the decision-making process was systematically developed. Subsequently relative weights of decision criteria were derived using AHP methodology and the export competitiveness of nuclear technology alternatives was quantified to prioritize them. We discuss the implications of our results with a viewpoint toward national nuclear technology policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Applied sciences ; Competitiveness ; Decision making ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Exports ; General, economic and professional studies ; Investment ; Methodology. Modelling ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear fuels ; Nuclear reactors ; Nuclear technology ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research and development ; South Korea ; Studies ; Technology selection ; Technology selection Nuclear technology Analytic hierarchy process</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010, Vol.38 (1), p.161-167</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-30bb42e87de6c8271c6f0aa4d987c2dcfc318d2ddd8f7577838e492ab87595c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-30bb42e87de6c8271c6f0aa4d987c2dcfc318d2ddd8f7577838e492ab87595c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,4024,27866,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22234883$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a161-167.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Deok Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jooho</creatorcontrib><title>Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The Korean government plans to increase strategically focused R&D investment in some promising nuclear technology areas to create export opportunities of technology in a global nuclear market. The purpose of this paper is to present a decision support process for selecting promising nuclear technology with the perspective of exportability by using the AHP based on extensive data gathered from nuclear experts in Korea. In this study, the decision criteria for evaluating the export competitiveness of nuclear technologies were determined, and a hierarchical structure for the decision-making process was systematically developed. Subsequently relative weights of decision criteria were derived using AHP methodology and the export competitiveness of nuclear technology alternatives was quantified to prioritize them. We discuss the implications of our results with a viewpoint toward national nuclear technology policy.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear technology</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology selection</subject><subject>Technology selection Nuclear technology Analytic hierarchy process</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEEkvhE3CxkOCW4D9J7CBxqAq0QCUucLa8k0njldcOdlI13x6HrXrgQC2NR7J-8_zk56J4zWjFKGvfHyr0U3AVp7SrqKpo2z0pdkxJUbZSyqfFjgrKypqz5nnxIqUDpbRWXb0rpk8INtngSVqmKcSZDCGShA5htv6G4N12aPYOiV_AoYlkRhh9cOFmJUvamHlEYrxx62yBjBajiTCuZIoBMKUP5Jx8DxGNJ2ASviyeDcYlfHXfz4pfXz7_vLgqr39cfr04vy6hpe1cCrrf1xyV7LEFxSWDdqDG1H2nJPAeBhBM9bzvezXIRkolFNYdN3slm64BJs6KdyfdbOP3gmnWR5sAnTMew5K0kJx3HZePgw3jrcoXPAZyxiTL5jP45h_wEJaYHygztBFcUr75EycIYkgp4qCnaI8mrppRvYWqD_pvqHoLVVOlc6h56ttpKuKE8DCCeXnc4FstjFB5W3NxmrWEsblYrmnrLdOslXqcj1ns7b1Pk8C4IRqf_8KDKOdc1EqJzH08cZjzus356gQWPWBvY_4mug_2v6b_AL8g0vA</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Lee, Deok Joo</creator><creator>Hwang, Jooho</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case</title><author>Lee, Deok Joo ; Hwang, Jooho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-30bb42e87de6c8271c6f0aa4d987c2dcfc318d2ddd8f7577838e492ab87595c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear technology</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology selection</topic><topic>Technology selection Nuclear technology Analytic hierarchy process</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Deok Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jooho</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Deok Joo</au><au>Hwang, Jooho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>161-167</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The Korean government plans to increase strategically focused R&D investment in some promising nuclear technology areas to create export opportunities of technology in a global nuclear market. The purpose of this paper is to present a decision support process for selecting promising nuclear technology with the perspective of exportability by using the AHP based on extensive data gathered from nuclear experts in Korea. In this study, the decision criteria for evaluating the export competitiveness of nuclear technologies were determined, and a hierarchical structure for the decision-making process was systematically developed. Subsequently relative weights of decision criteria were derived using AHP methodology and the export competitiveness of nuclear technology alternatives was quantified to prioritize them. We discuss the implications of our results with a viewpoint toward national nuclear technology policy.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.069</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
| ispartof | Energy policy, 2010, Vol.38 (1), p.161-167 |
| issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37229927 |
| source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Analytic hierarchy process Applied sciences Competitiveness Decision making Economic data Electric energy Energy Energy economics Energy policy Exact sciences and technology Exports General, economic and professional studies Investment Methodology. Modelling Multiple criteria decision making Nuclear energy Nuclear fuels Nuclear reactors Nuclear technology R&D Research & development Research and development South Korea Studies Technology selection Technology selection Nuclear technology Analytic hierarchy process |
| title | Decision support for selecting exportable nuclear technology using the analytic hierarchy process: A Korean case |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T14%3A23%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20support%20for%20selecting%20exportable%20nuclear%20technology%20using%20the%20analytic%20hierarchy%20process:%20A%20Korean%20case&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Lee,%20Deok%20Joo&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=161-167&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21171606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205327021&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421509006533&rfr_iscdi=true |