Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls?
This article adds to the empirical information on public perceptions of the need for food defense and food safety programs. This article reports results from three large internet surveys of US residents' attitudes and concerns about terrorism in the US. Funded by the National Center for Food Pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2008-12, Vol.90 (5), p.1272-1278 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1278 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1272 |
| container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Stinson, Thomas F. Ghosh, Koel Kinsey, Jean Degeneffe, Dennis |
| description | This article adds to the empirical information on public perceptions of the need for food defense and food safety programs. This article reports results from three large internet surveys of US residents' attitudes and concerns about terrorism in the US. Funded by the National Center for Food Protection and Defense, the surveys were administered by TNS-NFO. Regression analysis was used to identify the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents who chose to devote a higher proportion of antiterrorism spending to food defense programs than to other antiterrorist activities. Separate regressions were run for food defense and safety. Survey responses indicate that, not surprisingly, following the spinach, peanut butter, and pet food recalls, US residents were less confident that the nation's food supply was safe from natural or accidental contamination. The survey results also indicate that concerns over food defense grew over that period. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37158862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20492384</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20492384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553X-c47df6f20b58fcc0811c03310fc7eed7f89e6860241770b53e2901b66bdb3ae03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUUuP0zAQjhBIlF1-ApLFgVuCH4ntnFBpt1tWC0iUR8XFcpJJ6-KNu3Gibf_9Og3qAYGEL5bne3hmvihCBCcknLe7hKRcxJIKnlCMZYIJJTw5PIkmZ-BpNMEY0zjHOX0evfB-F56Y5HIS7ecOLV3vYetshaZdZ7q-Ao904foOLZyr0BxqaDwg3VRjYaVr6I5ottXNBkLJWvdgmg1ams3WHtF3401hAX3SnXGNtqPoC5TaWv_uMnpWa-vh5e_7Ivq2uPo6W8a3n68_zKa3cZllbB2XqahqXlNcZLIuSywJKTFjBNelAKhELXPgkmOaEiECiQHNMSk4L6qCacDsInoz-u5bd9-D79Sd8SVYqxsI8yomSCYlp4H4-g_izvVt6NsrGj7kjMs0kORIKlvnfQu12rfmTrdHRbAaclA7NaxbDetWQw7qlIM6BOnHUfpgLBz_W6emN9OrmwEboAE5Aevgx0Y_1-__4Rb_rYtXo2rnO9eedRSnOWWnAeMRN76DwxnX7S_FBROZWq5_qverH4vFfH6tVuwRnsG5LQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233163684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stinson, Thomas F. ; Ghosh, Koel ; Kinsey, Jean ; Degeneffe, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Stinson, Thomas F. ; Ghosh, Koel ; Kinsey, Jean ; Degeneffe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>This article adds to the empirical information on public perceptions of the need for food defense and food safety programs. This article reports results from three large internet surveys of US residents' attitudes and concerns about terrorism in the US. Funded by the National Center for Food Protection and Defense, the surveys were administered by TNS-NFO. Regression analysis was used to identify the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents who chose to devote a higher proportion of antiterrorism spending to food defense programs than to other antiterrorist activities. Separate regressions were run for food defense and safety. Survey responses indicate that, not surprisingly, following the spinach, peanut butter, and pet food recalls, US residents were less confident that the nation's food supply was safe from natural or accidental contamination. The survey results also indicate that concerns over food defense grew over that period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Attitudes ; D120 ; D180 ; Defense ; Effects of Biosecurity Risk and Food Scare Events on Food Prices and Demand ; Electrical grids ; Farmers ; Food defense ; Food industry ; Food safety ; Food security ; Food supply ; Food systems ; Household expenditure ; Methodology ; Public opinion surveys ; Q180 ; Regression analysis ; Retail stores ; Statistical significance ; Studies ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2008-12, Vol.90 (5), p.1272-1278</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Agricultural and Applied Econonomics Association 2008</rights><rights>2008 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553X-c47df6f20b58fcc0811c03310fc7eed7f89e6860241770b53e2901b66bdb3ae03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20492384$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20492384$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stinson, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Koel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsey, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degeneffe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls?</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>This article adds to the empirical information on public perceptions of the need for food defense and food safety programs. This article reports results from three large internet surveys of US residents' attitudes and concerns about terrorism in the US. Funded by the National Center for Food Protection and Defense, the surveys were administered by TNS-NFO. Regression analysis was used to identify the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents who chose to devote a higher proportion of antiterrorism spending to food defense programs than to other antiterrorist activities. Separate regressions were run for food defense and safety. Survey responses indicate that, not surprisingly, following the spinach, peanut butter, and pet food recalls, US residents were less confident that the nation's food supply was safe from natural or accidental contamination. The survey results also indicate that concerns over food defense grew over that period.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>D120</subject><subject>D180</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Effects of Biosecurity Risk and Food Scare Events on Food Prices and Demand</subject><subject>Electrical grids</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Food defense</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Food systems</subject><subject>Household expenditure</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Q180</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUUuP0zAQjhBIlF1-ApLFgVuCH4ntnFBpt1tWC0iUR8XFcpJJ6-KNu3Gibf_9Og3qAYGEL5bne3hmvihCBCcknLe7hKRcxJIKnlCMZYIJJTw5PIkmZ-BpNMEY0zjHOX0evfB-F56Y5HIS7ecOLV3vYetshaZdZ7q-Ao904foOLZyr0BxqaDwg3VRjYaVr6I5ottXNBkLJWvdgmg1ams3WHtF3401hAX3SnXGNtqPoC5TaWv_uMnpWa-vh5e_7Ivq2uPo6W8a3n68_zKa3cZllbB2XqahqXlNcZLIuSywJKTFjBNelAKhELXPgkmOaEiECiQHNMSk4L6qCacDsInoz-u5bd9-D79Sd8SVYqxsI8yomSCYlp4H4-g_izvVt6NsrGj7kjMs0kORIKlvnfQu12rfmTrdHRbAaclA7NaxbDetWQw7qlIM6BOnHUfpgLBz_W6emN9OrmwEboAE5Aevgx0Y_1-__4Rb_rYtXo2rnO9eedRSnOWWnAeMRN76DwxnX7S_FBROZWq5_qverH4vFfH6tVuwRnsG5LQ</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Stinson, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Ghosh, Koel</creator><creator>Kinsey, Jean</creator><creator>Degeneffe, Dennis</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls?</title><author>Stinson, Thomas F. ; Ghosh, Koel ; Kinsey, Jean ; Degeneffe, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553X-c47df6f20b58fcc0811c03310fc7eed7f89e6860241770b53e2901b66bdb3ae03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>D120</topic><topic>D180</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Effects of Biosecurity Risk and Food Scare Events on Food Prices and Demand</topic><topic>Electrical grids</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Food defense</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Food systems</topic><topic>Household expenditure</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Q180</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stinson, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Koel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsey, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degeneffe, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stinson, Thomas F.</au><au>Ghosh, Koel</au><au>Kinsey, Jean</au><au>Degeneffe, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><stitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</stitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1272</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1272-1278</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><coden>AJAEBA</coden><abstract>This article adds to the empirical information on public perceptions of the need for food defense and food safety programs. This article reports results from three large internet surveys of US residents' attitudes and concerns about terrorism in the US. Funded by the National Center for Food Protection and Defense, the surveys were administered by TNS-NFO. Regression analysis was used to identify the socioeconomic characteristics of respondents who chose to devote a higher proportion of antiterrorism spending to food defense programs than to other antiterrorist activities. Separate regressions were run for food defense and safety. Survey responses indicate that, not surprisingly, following the spinach, peanut butter, and pet food recalls, US residents were less confident that the nation's food supply was safe from natural or accidental contamination. The survey results also indicate that concerns over food defense grew over that period.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
| ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2008-12, Vol.90 (5), p.1272-1278 |
| issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37158862 |
| source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural economics Attitudes D120 D180 Defense Effects of Biosecurity Risk and Food Scare Events on Food Prices and Demand Electrical grids Farmers Food defense Food industry Food safety Food security Food supply Food systems Household expenditure Methodology Public opinion surveys Q180 Regression analysis Retail stores Statistical significance Studies Terrorism |
| title | Do Household Attitudes about Food Defense and Food Safety Change Following Highly Visible National Food Recalls? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A03%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Household%20Attitudes%20about%20Food%20Defense%20and%20Food%20Safety%20Change%20Following%20Highly%20Visible%20National%20Food%20Recalls?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Stinson,%20Thomas%20F.&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1272&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1272-1278&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft.coden=AJAEBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20492384%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233163684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20492384&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01216.x&rfr_iscdi=true |