The slicing approach to valuing tax shields

The literature develops the theoretical rationale for the Value of Tax Shields (VTS) on the following misguided basis: it uses required rate of return on assets (or WACC) as the discount rate for capitalization, it uses expected rate of return on assets ( ROA ¯ or ROI ¯ ) as a proxy for WACC, and it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of banking & finance 2009-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1069-1078
1. Verfasser: Liu, Yuan-Chi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1078
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1069
container_title Journal of banking & finance
container_volume 33
creator Liu, Yuan-Chi
description The literature develops the theoretical rationale for the Value of Tax Shields (VTS) on the following misguided basis: it uses required rate of return on assets (or WACC) as the discount rate for capitalization, it uses expected rate of return on assets ( ROA ¯ or ROI ¯ ) as a proxy for WACC, and it is not aware of (1) the influence of the difference between “expected rate of return on equity” and “Required rate of Return On Equity (RROE)” on VTS, (2) the fact that RROE is equity normal profit which is not measurable, (3) the economic content of the weight attached to the VTS capacity, and (4) the co-definition of “tax shield and leverage return.” This paper takes tax shields and leverage return as a system and provides a knife, “interest rate/ROI = Cost/Price”, to slice the VTS capacity into “earned VTS” and “unearned VTS.” Earned VTS is VTS. Unearned VTS is the value of leverage return, because leverage return is tax payable.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37153392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378426608002872</els_id><sourcerecordid>1670276901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-8b39cd025b6a614b8de5f2db7671af55b3b3bbe3e59114fb23f3d9f2b24c33a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1L7DAUDaLg-PEXpLhwI-1Lctu03fkQ9QkDbnQdkvTWSe20NekMz3_vHcb3Fm5MOPdCOOfkcBi7EDwTXKhfXdZZM7y1fsgk51UmZMa5PGALUZUyVVDKQ7bgUFZpLpU6ZicxdpxOJWDBrp9XmMTeOz-8JmaawmjcKpnHZGv6ze5tNn-TuPLYN_GMHbWmj3j-tU_Zy_3d8-2fdPn08Hj7e5m6QuZzWlmoXcNlYZVRIrdVg0UrG1uqUpi2KCzQtQhY1ELkrZXQQlO30srcAZgCTtnV3pfSvG8wznrto8O-NwOOm6ihFAVALYl4-Y3YjZswUDYt6rwWsuIlkdSe5MIYY8BWT8GvTfjQgutdgbrT_wrUuwK1kJoKJOFyLww4ofuvQsTOEtforQYDQOODQMqalicowkQQXNX0Q1np1bwmu5u9HVJ1W49BR-dxcNj4gG7Wzeh_SvQJQ6KU9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194912807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The slicing approach to valuing tax shields</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Yuan-Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan-Chi</creatorcontrib><description>The literature develops the theoretical rationale for the Value of Tax Shields (VTS) on the following misguided basis: it uses required rate of return on assets (or WACC) as the discount rate for capitalization, it uses expected rate of return on assets ( ROA ¯ or ROI ¯ ) as a proxy for WACC, and it is not aware of (1) the influence of the difference between “expected rate of return on equity” and “Required rate of Return On Equity (RROE)” on VTS, (2) the fact that RROE is equity normal profit which is not measurable, (3) the economic content of the weight attached to the VTS capacity, and (4) the co-definition of “tax shield and leverage return.” This paper takes tax shields and leverage return as a system and provides a knife, “interest rate/ROI = Cost/Price”, to slice the VTS capacity into “earned VTS” and “unearned VTS.” Earned VTS is VTS. Unearned VTS is the value of leverage return, because leverage return is tax payable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBFIDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Capital returns ; Discount rates ; Expectation ; Expected returns ; Fiscal theory ; Leverage ; Leverage return ; Measurement ; Profit ; Required rate of return ; Return on assets ; Studies ; Tax deductions ; Tax shields ; Tax shields Leverage return The VTS capacity Required rate of return ; The VTS capacity</subject><ispartof>Journal of banking &amp; finance, 2009-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1069-1078</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-8b39cd025b6a614b8de5f2db7671af55b3b3bbe3e59114fb23f3d9f2b24c33a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-8b39cd025b6a614b8de5f2db7671af55b3b3bbe3e59114fb23f3d9f2b24c33a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426608002872$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejbfina/v_3a33_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a1069-1078.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan-Chi</creatorcontrib><title>The slicing approach to valuing tax shields</title><title>Journal of banking &amp; finance</title><description>The literature develops the theoretical rationale for the Value of Tax Shields (VTS) on the following misguided basis: it uses required rate of return on assets (or WACC) as the discount rate for capitalization, it uses expected rate of return on assets ( ROA ¯ or ROI ¯ ) as a proxy for WACC, and it is not aware of (1) the influence of the difference between “expected rate of return on equity” and “Required rate of Return On Equity (RROE)” on VTS, (2) the fact that RROE is equity normal profit which is not measurable, (3) the economic content of the weight attached to the VTS capacity, and (4) the co-definition of “tax shield and leverage return.” This paper takes tax shields and leverage return as a system and provides a knife, “interest rate/ROI = Cost/Price”, to slice the VTS capacity into “earned VTS” and “unearned VTS.” Earned VTS is VTS. Unearned VTS is the value of leverage return, because leverage return is tax payable.</description><subject>Capital returns</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Expected returns</subject><subject>Fiscal theory</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Leverage return</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Profit</subject><subject>Required rate of return</subject><subject>Return on assets</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax deductions</subject><subject>Tax shields</subject><subject>Tax shields Leverage return The VTS capacity Required rate of return</subject><subject>The VTS capacity</subject><issn>0378-4266</issn><issn>1872-6372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1L7DAUDaLg-PEXpLhwI-1Lctu03fkQ9QkDbnQdkvTWSe20NekMz3_vHcb3Fm5MOPdCOOfkcBi7EDwTXKhfXdZZM7y1fsgk51UmZMa5PGALUZUyVVDKQ7bgUFZpLpU6ZicxdpxOJWDBrp9XmMTeOz-8JmaawmjcKpnHZGv6ze5tNn-TuPLYN_GMHbWmj3j-tU_Zy_3d8-2fdPn08Hj7e5m6QuZzWlmoXcNlYZVRIrdVg0UrG1uqUpi2KCzQtQhY1ELkrZXQQlO30srcAZgCTtnV3pfSvG8wznrto8O-NwOOm6ihFAVALYl4-Y3YjZswUDYt6rwWsuIlkdSe5MIYY8BWT8GvTfjQgutdgbrT_wrUuwK1kJoKJOFyLww4ofuvQsTOEtforQYDQOODQMqalicowkQQXNX0Q1np1bwmu5u9HVJ1W49BR-dxcNj4gG7Wzeh_SvQJQ6KU9w</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Liu, Yuan-Chi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>The slicing approach to valuing tax shields</title><author>Liu, Yuan-Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-8b39cd025b6a614b8de5f2db7671af55b3b3bbe3e59114fb23f3d9f2b24c33a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Capital returns</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Expected returns</topic><topic>Fiscal theory</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Leverage return</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Profit</topic><topic>Required rate of return</topic><topic>Return on assets</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax deductions</topic><topic>Tax shields</topic><topic>Tax shields Leverage return The VTS capacity Required rate of return</topic><topic>The VTS capacity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan-Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of banking &amp; finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yuan-Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The slicing approach to valuing tax shields</atitle><jtitle>Journal of banking &amp; finance</jtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1069</spage><epage>1078</epage><pages>1069-1078</pages><issn>0378-4266</issn><eissn>1872-6372</eissn><coden>JBFIDO</coden><abstract>The literature develops the theoretical rationale for the Value of Tax Shields (VTS) on the following misguided basis: it uses required rate of return on assets (or WACC) as the discount rate for capitalization, it uses expected rate of return on assets ( ROA ¯ or ROI ¯ ) as a proxy for WACC, and it is not aware of (1) the influence of the difference between “expected rate of return on equity” and “Required rate of Return On Equity (RROE)” on VTS, (2) the fact that RROE is equity normal profit which is not measurable, (3) the economic content of the weight attached to the VTS capacity, and (4) the co-definition of “tax shield and leverage return.” This paper takes tax shields and leverage return as a system and provides a knife, “interest rate/ROI = Cost/Price”, to slice the VTS capacity into “earned VTS” and “unearned VTS.” Earned VTS is VTS. Unearned VTS is the value of leverage return, because leverage return is tax payable.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4266
ispartof Journal of banking & finance, 2009-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1069-1078
issn 0378-4266
1872-6372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37153392
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Capital returns
Discount rates
Expectation
Expected returns
Fiscal theory
Leverage
Leverage return
Measurement
Profit
Required rate of return
Return on assets
Studies
Tax deductions
Tax shields
Tax shields Leverage return The VTS capacity Required rate of return
The VTS capacity
title The slicing approach to valuing tax shields
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20slicing%20approach%20to%20valuing%20tax%20shields&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20banking%20&%20finance&rft.au=Liu,%20Yuan-Chi&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1069&rft.epage=1078&rft.pages=1069-1078&rft.issn=0378-4266&rft.eissn=1872-6372&rft.coden=JBFIDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1670276901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194912807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378426608002872&rfr_iscdi=true