Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism

Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inhe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research policy 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864
Hauptverfasser: Welsh, Rick, Glenna, Leland, Lacy, William, Biscotti, Dina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1864
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1854
container_title Research policy
container_volume 37
creator Welsh, Rick
Glenna, Leland
Lacy, William
Biscotti, Dina
description Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37131925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733308001595</els_id><sourcerecordid>1608580801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxiMEEsvBG1BYFHQb7DiJEwqk0-r4Ix2igdryTiYXrxI7eJyVtqPjAXhDngTncqKgoBjPFL_vm5G_LHspeC64qN-c8oA0-zEvOG9yrnIu-KNsJxol96ouqsfZjvOy2Ssp5dPsGdGJcy5K3u6yn4fREzJ0frkb2HGJzPnIovesN-EtuyZCIuvuWBwS1fcIkZjv2eLsGQPZePn945d13UIxXFg6A02AIQ2jidY7GuxMzLjuXh9sWpXEBkyHkwUGZrbRjJam59mT3oyELx76Vfbt_c3Xw8f97ZcPnw7Xt3so2zrui9RQYdfUqpJHhVg2XYNFzxXvQIm2Qmw7Y0D2LdSiAVBQ1lAe-7qVkoOUV9nrzXcO_vuCFPVkCXAcjUO_kJZKSNEWVQJf_QOe_BJcuk0XhSxWbnUrNwiCJwrY6znYyYSLFlyv0eiT3qLRazSaK52iSbLPmyzgjPBXg4gP8FlLI1V6LqnuldLYVMlVmnkdmqrUoqlLPcQp-b3b_DD93Nli0AQWHWBnQwpMd97-_6A_ayy3XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223237133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</creator><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><description>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural biotechnology ; Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research ; Biotechnology ; Business education relationship ; Capitalism ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Impact analysis ; Industrial research ; Industrial sector ; Intellectual property ; Public goods ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research policy ; Scientists ; Studies ; Technology transfer ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27903,27904,65308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a37_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a1854-1864.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenna, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><title>Research policy</title><description>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</description><subject>Agricultural biotechnology</subject><subject>Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Business education relationship</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Industrial research</subject><subject>Industrial sector</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research policy</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxiMEEsvBG1BYFHQb7DiJEwqk0-r4Ix2igdryTiYXrxI7eJyVtqPjAXhDngTncqKgoBjPFL_vm5G_LHspeC64qN-c8oA0-zEvOG9yrnIu-KNsJxol96ouqsfZjvOy2Ssp5dPsGdGJcy5K3u6yn4fREzJ0frkb2HGJzPnIovesN-EtuyZCIuvuWBwS1fcIkZjv2eLsGQPZePn945d13UIxXFg6A02AIQ2jidY7GuxMzLjuXh9sWpXEBkyHkwUGZrbRjJam59mT3oyELx76Vfbt_c3Xw8f97ZcPnw7Xt3so2zrui9RQYdfUqpJHhVg2XYNFzxXvQIm2Qmw7Y0D2LdSiAVBQ1lAe-7qVkoOUV9nrzXcO_vuCFPVkCXAcjUO_kJZKSNEWVQJf_QOe_BJcuk0XhSxWbnUrNwiCJwrY6znYyYSLFlyv0eiT3qLRazSaK52iSbLPmyzgjPBXg4gP8FlLI1V6LqnuldLYVMlVmnkdmqrUoqlLPcQp-b3b_DD93Nli0AQWHWBnQwpMd97-_6A_ayy3XA</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Welsh, Rick</creator><creator>Glenna, Leland</creator><creator>Lacy, William</creator><creator>Biscotti, Dina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><author>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural biotechnology</topic><topic>Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Business education relationship</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Industrial research</topic><topic>Industrial sector</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research policy</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenna, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Welsh, Rick</au><au>Glenna, Leland</au><au>Lacy, William</au><au>Biscotti, Dina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1854</spage><epage>1864</epage><pages>1854-1864</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-7333
ispartof Research policy, 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864
issn 0048-7333
1873-7625
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37131925
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural biotechnology
Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research
Biotechnology
Business education relationship
Capitalism
Colleges & universities
Impact analysis
Industrial research
Industrial sector
Intellectual property
Public goods
R&D
Research & development
Research policy
Scientists
Studies
Technology transfer
Universities
title Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A00%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Close%20enough%20but%20not%20too%20far:%20Assessing%20the%20effects%20of%20university%E2%80%93industry%20research%20relationships%20and%20the%20rise%20of%20academic%20capitalism&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=Welsh,%20Rick&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1854&rft.epage=1864&rft.pages=1854-1864&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1608580801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223237133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048733308001595&rfr_iscdi=true