Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism
Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inhe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research policy 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1864 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1854 |
container_title | Research policy |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Welsh, Rick Glenna, Leland Lacy, William Biscotti, Dina |
description | Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37131925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733308001595</els_id><sourcerecordid>1608580801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxiMEEsvBG1BYFHQb7DiJEwqk0-r4Ix2igdryTiYXrxI7eJyVtqPjAXhDngTncqKgoBjPFL_vm5G_LHspeC64qN-c8oA0-zEvOG9yrnIu-KNsJxol96ouqsfZjvOy2Ssp5dPsGdGJcy5K3u6yn4fREzJ0frkb2HGJzPnIovesN-EtuyZCIuvuWBwS1fcIkZjv2eLsGQPZePn945d13UIxXFg6A02AIQ2jidY7GuxMzLjuXh9sWpXEBkyHkwUGZrbRjJam59mT3oyELx76Vfbt_c3Xw8f97ZcPnw7Xt3so2zrui9RQYdfUqpJHhVg2XYNFzxXvQIm2Qmw7Y0D2LdSiAVBQ1lAe-7qVkoOUV9nrzXcO_vuCFPVkCXAcjUO_kJZKSNEWVQJf_QOe_BJcuk0XhSxWbnUrNwiCJwrY6znYyYSLFlyv0eiT3qLRazSaK52iSbLPmyzgjPBXg4gP8FlLI1V6LqnuldLYVMlVmnkdmqrUoqlLPcQp-b3b_DD93Nli0AQWHWBnQwpMd97-_6A_ayy3XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223237133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</creator><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><description>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural biotechnology ; Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research ; Biotechnology ; Business education relationship ; Capitalism ; Colleges & universities ; Impact analysis ; Industrial research ; Industrial sector ; Intellectual property ; Public goods ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research policy ; Scientists ; Studies ; Technology transfer ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27903,27904,65308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerespol/v_3a37_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a1854-1864.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenna, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><title>Research policy</title><description>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</description><subject>Agricultural biotechnology</subject><subject>Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Business education relationship</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Industrial research</subject><subject>Industrial sector</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research policy</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxiMEEsvBG1BYFHQb7DiJEwqk0-r4Ix2igdryTiYXrxI7eJyVtqPjAXhDngTncqKgoBjPFL_vm5G_LHspeC64qN-c8oA0-zEvOG9yrnIu-KNsJxol96ouqsfZjvOy2Ssp5dPsGdGJcy5K3u6yn4fREzJ0frkb2HGJzPnIovesN-EtuyZCIuvuWBwS1fcIkZjv2eLsGQPZePn945d13UIxXFg6A02AIQ2jidY7GuxMzLjuXh9sWpXEBkyHkwUGZrbRjJam59mT3oyELx76Vfbt_c3Xw8f97ZcPnw7Xt3so2zrui9RQYdfUqpJHhVg2XYNFzxXvQIm2Qmw7Y0D2LdSiAVBQ1lAe-7qVkoOUV9nrzXcO_vuCFPVkCXAcjUO_kJZKSNEWVQJf_QOe_BJcuk0XhSxWbnUrNwiCJwrY6znYyYSLFlyv0eiT3qLRazSaK52iSbLPmyzgjPBXg4gP8FlLI1V6LqnuldLYVMlVmnkdmqrUoqlLPcQp-b3b_DD93Nli0AQWHWBnQwpMd97-_6A_ayy3XA</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Welsh, Rick</creator><creator>Glenna, Leland</creator><creator>Lacy, William</creator><creator>Biscotti, Dina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</title><author>Welsh, Rick ; Glenna, Leland ; Lacy, William ; Biscotti, Dina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-2c49e7ed86753b7ee48d8e2f070dc7195ee9daac3f9c618cc7c46c4bf69330c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural biotechnology</topic><topic>Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Business education relationship</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Industrial research</topic><topic>Industrial sector</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research policy</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenna, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscotti, Dina</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Welsh, Rick</au><au>Glenna, Leland</au><au>Lacy, William</au><au>Biscotti, Dina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1854</spage><epage>1864</epage><pages>1854-1864</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>Analysts assessing the impact of university–industry research relations (UIRRs) and increasing proprietary behavior on the part of universities often focus on single-indicators or adopt promotional or critical stances. However, assessing impacts of shifts toward a more proprietary university is inherently complex because of potential countervailing or mediating factors within working relationships. From interviews with 84 biological scientists at nine universities we find scientists view UIRRS and university intellectual property (IP) policies in complex and often conflicting ways. For example, university scientists believe UIRRs are valuable for increasing contact with scientists, but are problematic because working with industry can restrict communication among scientists. Also scientists believe university IP policies should shield their work from opportunistic behavior and at the same time be designed to attract industry partners. In addition scientists believe universities use their IP policies primarily as revenue raising vehicles and secondarily to address public good issues such as technology transfer.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-7333 |
ispartof | Research policy, 2008-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1854-1864 |
issn | 0048-7333 1873-7625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37131925 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agricultural biotechnology Agricultural biotechnology Intellectual property Technology transfer Universities Research Biotechnology Business education relationship Capitalism Colleges & universities Impact analysis Industrial research Industrial sector Intellectual property Public goods R&D Research & development Research policy Scientists Studies Technology transfer Universities |
title | Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university–industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A00%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Close%20enough%20but%20not%20too%20far:%20Assessing%20the%20effects%20of%20university%E2%80%93industry%20research%20relationships%20and%20the%20rise%20of%20academic%20capitalism&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=Welsh,%20Rick&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1854&rft.epage=1864&rft.pages=1854-1864&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1608580801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223237133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048733308001595&rfr_iscdi=true |