Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina
The economic measures adopted by Argentina during the grave crisis that afflicted the country at the turning of the century have generated a stream of disputes with foreign investors in which Argentina tried to justify these measures on grounds of necessity. This article discusses the decisions of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of energy & natural resources law 2008-08, Vol.26 (3), p.450-469 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 450 |
container_title | Journal of energy & natural resources law |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Gazzini, Tarcisio |
description | The economic measures adopted by Argentina during the grave crisis that afflicted the country at the turning of the century have generated a stream of disputes with foreign investors in which Argentina tried to justify these measures on grounds of necessity. This article discusses the decisions of the Arbitral Tribunal and the ad hoc Committee in CMS v Argentina, focusing on the conditions imposed by the Argentina-United States bilateral investment treaty and by customary international law, as well as on the relationship between the two sources. It also briefly addresses the question of the alleged self-judging character of the relevant article of the treaty and the issue of compensation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02646811.2008.11435194 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iba_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37102008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37102008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-60648d77ea9cb7dcf90d54fc46c3795fe7558129e6a936b22581b6442561a3573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhSMEEmXgFVBW7Fr8Fydhl4Z0mFEZpHZYX7mOUxkSu9hJR50H4_lwyLQIsWDln3vuuVfni6K3GC0wytB7RDjjGcYLglC2wJjRBOfsWTQjNOVzltDseTQbRfNR9TJ65f03hCjGnMyi7Z2Synvdn2Jt4hvTK2dEr60RbXgdle87Zfp4LR4-xFvbqbh0utcyVDeqE-67j62Jy8_b-BgXbh-k2ojX0YtGtF69eTqvoq-r6r78NF9_ub4pi_VcJpz3c444y-o0VSKXu7SWTY7qhDWScUnTPGlUmiQZJrniIqd8R0h47ThjJOFY0CSlV9G7yffg7I8hrAqd9lK1rTDKDh5oitGYSRDySSid9d6pBg5Oh-1PgBGMGcI5Qxj1cM4wNBZTozaNdZ14sK6toRen1rrGCSN1mPJfj-WTx05c5vIVYR-XKwRllifAUE5gyasCyhUvWU7SIqsqOIi9AjN0gIPJz39Nbu0QYLVgG6iMcvsT3Il-cOFno3yoBbAQwMFttVlPSxXDfggxhdsFO2gDf2GHP9h_d4_U4Uwd3EQdrIFAHY5woQ73woU8tIVr8fiojYZD3dBfL_HSlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37102008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><description>The economic measures adopted by Argentina during the grave crisis that afflicted the country at the turning of the century have generated a stream of disputes with foreign investors in which Argentina tried to justify these measures on grounds of necessity. This article discusses the decisions of the Arbitral Tribunal and the ad hoc Committee in CMS v Argentina, focusing on the conditions imposed by the Argentina-United States bilateral investment treaty and by customary international law, as well as on the relationship between the two sources. It also briefly addresses the question of the alleged self-judging character of the relevant article of the treaty and the issue of compensation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-6811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-4538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02646811.2008.11435194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Argentina ; Bilateral relations ; Compensation ; Customary law ; Economic crisis ; Foreign direct investment ; International economic law ; Trade disputes ; Treaties ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of energy & natural resources law, 2008-08, Vol.26 (3), p.450-469</ispartof><rights>2008 Section on Energy, Environment, Natural Resources, and Infrastructure Law of the IBA 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-60648d77ea9cb7dcf90d54fc46c3795fe7558129e6a936b22581b6442561a3573</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><title>Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina</title><title>Journal of energy & natural resources law</title><description>The economic measures adopted by Argentina during the grave crisis that afflicted the country at the turning of the century have generated a stream of disputes with foreign investors in which Argentina tried to justify these measures on grounds of necessity. This article discusses the decisions of the Arbitral Tribunal and the ad hoc Committee in CMS v Argentina, focusing on the conditions imposed by the Argentina-United States bilateral investment treaty and by customary international law, as well as on the relationship between the two sources. It also briefly addresses the question of the alleged self-judging character of the relevant article of the treaty and the issue of compensation.</description><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Bilateral relations</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Customary law</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Foreign direct investment</subject><subject>International economic law</subject><subject>Trade disputes</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0264-6811</issn><issn>2376-4538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhSMEEmXgFVBW7Fr8Fydhl4Z0mFEZpHZYX7mOUxkSu9hJR50H4_lwyLQIsWDln3vuuVfni6K3GC0wytB7RDjjGcYLglC2wJjRBOfsWTQjNOVzltDseTQbRfNR9TJ65f03hCjGnMyi7Z2Synvdn2Jt4hvTK2dEr60RbXgdle87Zfp4LR4-xFvbqbh0utcyVDeqE-67j62Jy8_b-BgXbh-k2ojX0YtGtF69eTqvoq-r6r78NF9_ub4pi_VcJpz3c444y-o0VSKXu7SWTY7qhDWScUnTPGlUmiQZJrniIqd8R0h47ThjJOFY0CSlV9G7yffg7I8hrAqd9lK1rTDKDh5oitGYSRDySSid9d6pBg5Oh-1PgBGMGcI5Qxj1cM4wNBZTozaNdZ14sK6toRen1rrGCSN1mPJfj-WTx05c5vIVYR-XKwRllifAUE5gyasCyhUvWU7SIqsqOIi9AjN0gIPJz39Nbu0QYLVgG6iMcvsT3Il-cOFno3yoBbAQwMFttVlPSxXDfggxhdsFO2gDf2GHP9h_d4_U4Uwd3EQdrIFAHY5woQ73woU8tIVr8fiojYZD3dBfL_HSlA</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina</title><author>Gazzini, Tarcisio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-60648d77ea9cb7dcf90d54fc46c3795fe7558129e6a936b22581b6442561a3573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Bilateral relations</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Customary law</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Foreign direct investment</topic><topic>International economic law</topic><topic>Trade disputes</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gazzini, Tarcisio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of energy & natural resources law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gazzini, Tarcisio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Journal of energy & natural resources law</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>450</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>450-469</pages><issn>0264-6811</issn><eissn>2376-4538</eissn><abstract>The economic measures adopted by Argentina during the grave crisis that afflicted the country at the turning of the century have generated a stream of disputes with foreign investors in which Argentina tried to justify these measures on grounds of necessity. This article discusses the decisions of the Arbitral Tribunal and the ad hoc Committee in CMS v Argentina, focusing on the conditions imposed by the Argentina-United States bilateral investment treaty and by customary international law, as well as on the relationship between the two sources. It also briefly addresses the question of the alleged self-judging character of the relevant article of the treaty and the issue of compensation.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02646811.2008.11435194</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-6811 |
ispartof | Journal of energy & natural resources law, 2008-08, Vol.26 (3), p.450-469 |
issn | 0264-6811 2376-4538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37102008 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Argentina Bilateral relations Compensation Customary law Economic crisis Foreign direct investment International economic law Trade disputes Treaties U.S.A |
title | Necessity in International Investment Law: Some Critical Remarks on CMS v Argentina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iba_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Necessity%20in%20International%20Investment%20Law:%20Some%20Critical%20Remarks%20on%20CMS%20v%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20energy%20&%20natural%20resources%20law&rft.au=Gazzini,%20Tarcisio&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=450&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=450-469&rft.issn=0264-6811&rft.eissn=2376-4538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02646811.2008.11435194&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iba_p%3E37102008%3C/proquest_iba_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37102008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |