Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review
This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Economic journal (London) 2009-02, Vol.119 (535), p.F123-F135 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | F135 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 535 |
| container_start_page | F123 |
| container_title | The Economic journal (London) |
| container_volume | 119 |
| creator | Breyer, Stephen |
| description | This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second whether a bright line rule or a rule of reason should apply to resale price maintenance and the third on whether copyright protection should be extended by a further 20 years. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02233.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37084440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20485314</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20485314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-fee39adbd3f45485c54df3937d34d953d98326c590fb090a2d50d034e1e98a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1P3DAQtaoidUv7E6queuCWMPbYiX2pVK0WKCCQKBXcRiZ2kNNsQuPdsvz7OqTaQy8wkuXRvA9p3jA255DzVIdNzmWhMxCmzAWAzkEIxHz7hs12wFs2A-CYpYfv2PsYG0glUM7YwbLqu34VqvmVt7HvQnc_t52bn25cqIJt0_hP8I8f2F5t2-g__vv32fXR8npxkp1fHn9ffDvPKiUNZrX3aKy7c1hLJbVKU1ejwdKhdEahMxpFUSkD9R0YsMIpcIDSc2-0lbjPDibbh6H_vfFxTasQK9-2tvP9JhKWoKWU8CJRgEyL65H45T9i02-GLu1A3GgBhXp20xOpGvoYB1_TwxBWdngiDjSmTA2NYdIYJo0p03PKtE3Sr5P0MbT-6dU6Wi4uT8c2GXyaDJq47oedQVpAK-RjJNmEh7j22x1uh19UlFgqurk4ptuz4uTm4uiWdOJ_nvi17cneDyHSzx8iXR640gWmA_wFtC6iEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198206540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Breyer, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Breyer, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second whether a bright line rule or a rule of reason should apply to resale price maintenance and the third on whether copyright protection should be extended by a further 20 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02233.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Antitrust ; Copyright ; Economic benefits ; Economic competition ; Economic costs ; Economic theory ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental protection ; Feature: Economic Rules of Law ; Intellectual property rights ; Judicial process ; Judicial reviews ; Justice ; Law ; Reasoning ; Resale price maintenance ; Rule of law ; Rule of reason ; Statutory law ; Studies ; Supreme Court ; Supreme Court decisions ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>The Economic journal (London), 2009-02, Vol.119 (535), p.F123-F135</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Royal Economic Society</rights><rights>The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-fee39adbd3f45485c54df3937d34d953d98326c590fb090a2d50d034e1e98a43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20485314$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20485314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breyer, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review</title><title>The Economic journal (London)</title><description>This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second whether a bright line rule or a rule of reason should apply to resale price maintenance and the third on whether copyright protection should be extended by a further 20 years.</description><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Economic benefits</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic costs</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Feature: Economic Rules of Law</subject><subject>Intellectual property rights</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Resale price maintenance</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Rule of reason</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0013-0133</issn><issn>1468-0297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1P3DAQtaoidUv7E6queuCWMPbYiX2pVK0WKCCQKBXcRiZ2kNNsQuPdsvz7OqTaQy8wkuXRvA9p3jA255DzVIdNzmWhMxCmzAWAzkEIxHz7hs12wFs2A-CYpYfv2PsYG0glUM7YwbLqu34VqvmVt7HvQnc_t52bn25cqIJt0_hP8I8f2F5t2-g__vv32fXR8npxkp1fHn9ffDvPKiUNZrX3aKy7c1hLJbVKU1ejwdKhdEahMxpFUSkD9R0YsMIpcIDSc2-0lbjPDibbh6H_vfFxTasQK9-2tvP9JhKWoKWU8CJRgEyL65H45T9i02-GLu1A3GgBhXp20xOpGvoYB1_TwxBWdngiDjSmTA2NYdIYJo0p03PKtE3Sr5P0MbT-6dU6Wi4uT8c2GXyaDJq47oedQVpAK-RjJNmEh7j22x1uh19UlFgqurk4ptuz4uTm4uiWdOJ_nvi17cneDyHSzx8iXR640gWmA_wFtC6iEA</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>Breyer, Stephen</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review</title><author>Breyer, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5493-fee39adbd3f45485c54df3937d34d953d98326c590fb090a2d50d034e1e98a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Economic benefits</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic costs</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Feature: Economic Rules of Law</topic><topic>Intellectual property rights</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Resale price maintenance</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Rule of reason</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breyer, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breyer, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review</atitle><jtitle>The Economic journal (London)</jtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>535</issue><spage>F123</spage><epage>F135</epage><pages>F123-F135</pages><issn>0013-0133</issn><eissn>1468-0297</eissn><coden>ECJOAB</coden><abstract>This article considers the use of the economics in the law in the context of the US Supreme Court, of which the author is one of the Justices. It focuses on three cases where he has dissented, the first considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency may consider economic costs, the second whether a bright line rule or a rule of reason should apply to resale price maintenance and the third on whether copyright protection should be extended by a further 20 years.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02233.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-0133 |
| ispartof | The Economic journal (London), 2009-02, Vol.119 (535), p.F123-F135 |
| issn | 0013-0133 1468-0297 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37084440 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Antitrust Copyright Economic benefits Economic competition Economic costs Economic theory Environmental agencies Environmental protection Feature: Economic Rules of Law Intellectual property rights Judicial process Judicial reviews Justice Law Reasoning Resale price maintenance Rule of law Rule of reason Statutory law Studies Supreme Court Supreme Court decisions U.S.A |
| title | Economic Reasoning and Judicial Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A48%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Reasoning%20and%20Judicial%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20journal%20(London)&rft.au=Breyer,%20Stephen&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=535&rft.spage=F123&rft.epage=F135&rft.pages=F123-F135&rft.issn=0013-0133&rft.eissn=1468-0297&rft.coden=ECJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02233.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20485314%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198206540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20485314&rfr_iscdi=true |