European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder
In a period of just under 20 years, 15 Western European countries have adopted national same-sex union (SSU) laws that legally recognize the gay and lesbian couples who chose to enter them. This rather startling case of convergent policy change has largely slipped under the radar screens of politica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary politics 2009-03, Vol.15 (1), p.37-53 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 53 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Contemporary politics |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Kollman, Kelly |
description | In a period of just under 20 years, 15 Western European countries have adopted national same-sex union (SSU) laws that legally recognize the gay and lesbian couples who chose to enter them. This rather startling case of convergent policy change has largely slipped under the radar screens of political scientists. This article argues that the European Union (EU), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and a transnational network of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender activists have played a crucial role in this policy change by creating a soft law norm for relationship recognition and disseminating this norm to policymakers in Western European states. More recently, both the EU and the ECtHR have begun mandating some minimal recognition of same-sex couples. Using Austria and Germany as comparative cases, the article posits further that Europe has had a far greater impact on national policy outcomes when its influence has been felt through the informal processes of norm diffusion and elite socialization than when it has tried to impose formal mandates through court decisions and EU directives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13569770802674204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37072596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37072596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9d689dcbf218e49adcc92b389421cd905bd35a87cce4e19f7b908f96baee8d833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhgdRsFYfwF1WrhxNJjOTRNxIqRcouNF1yCQZGs0kNcnQ9u1NqbgR7Orc_u8c-E9RXCJ4gyCFtwg3LSMkp1VL6grWR8UE1S0rcYvRcc7zvMyC5rQ4i_EDQtQSiiaFnY_Br7RwwLiYTBqT8S5egxSEi07sKmGB02ntw2cEwinw241i0GXUGzC6HQRW3hq5vQPrpXYg-j4BK9ZgaVIESxGUDufFSS9s1Bc_cVq8P87fZs_l4vXpZfawKCWucCqZailTsusrRHXNhJKSVR2mrK6QVAw2ncKNoERKXWvEetIxSHvWdkJrqijG0-Jqv3cV_NeoY-KDiVJbK5z2Y-QNYyhbRQ4KMYGkalibhWgvlMHHGHTPV8EMImw5gnz3AP7nAZm53zPG9T4MIjtoFU9ia33os73S5AP_4eQg_ofiaZPwN2PFoKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37072596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Kollman, Kelly</creator><creatorcontrib>Kollman, Kelly</creatorcontrib><description>In a period of just under 20 years, 15 Western European countries have adopted national same-sex union (SSU) laws that legally recognize the gay and lesbian couples who chose to enter them. This rather startling case of convergent policy change has largely slipped under the radar screens of political scientists. This article argues that the European Union (EU), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and a transnational network of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender activists have played a crucial role in this policy change by creating a soft law norm for relationship recognition and disseminating this norm to policymakers in Western European states. More recently, both the EU and the ECtHR have begun mandating some minimal recognition of same-sex couples. Using Austria and Germany as comparative cases, the article posits further that Europe has had a far greater impact on national policy outcomes when its influence has been felt through the informal processes of norm diffusion and elite socialization than when it has tried to impose formal mandates through court decisions and EU directives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-9775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13569770802674204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Activism ; Austria ; Bisexuality ; constructivist theory ; Couples ; Courts ; Europe ; European Union ; Europeanization ; Family policy ; Federal Republic of Germany ; Germany ; Homosexuality ; Law ; lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movement ; Lobbying ; Member states ; Networks ; Policy Reform ; Political movements ; Same-sex marriage ; same-sex unions policy ; Socialization ; Transnationalism ; Unions</subject><ispartof>Contemporary politics, 2009-03, Vol.15 (1), p.37-53</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9d689dcbf218e49adcc92b389421cd905bd35a87cce4e19f7b908f96baee8d833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9d689dcbf218e49adcc92b389421cd905bd35a87cce4e19f7b908f96baee8d833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13569770802674204$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569770802674204$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,59645,60434</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kollman, Kelly</creatorcontrib><title>European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder</title><title>Contemporary politics</title><description>In a period of just under 20 years, 15 Western European countries have adopted national same-sex union (SSU) laws that legally recognize the gay and lesbian couples who chose to enter them. This rather startling case of convergent policy change has largely slipped under the radar screens of political scientists. This article argues that the European Union (EU), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and a transnational network of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender activists have played a crucial role in this policy change by creating a soft law norm for relationship recognition and disseminating this norm to policymakers in Western European states. More recently, both the EU and the ECtHR have begun mandating some minimal recognition of same-sex couples. Using Austria and Germany as comparative cases, the article posits further that Europe has had a far greater impact on national policy outcomes when its influence has been felt through the informal processes of norm diffusion and elite socialization than when it has tried to impose formal mandates through court decisions and EU directives.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>constructivist theory</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Europeanization</subject><subject>Family policy</subject><subject>Federal Republic of Germany</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movement</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Member states</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Policy Reform</subject><subject>Political movements</subject><subject>Same-sex marriage</subject><subject>same-sex unions policy</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Unions</subject><issn>1356-9775</issn><issn>1469-3631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhgdRsFYfwF1WrhxNJjOTRNxIqRcouNF1yCQZGs0kNcnQ9u1NqbgR7Orc_u8c-E9RXCJ4gyCFtwg3LSMkp1VL6grWR8UE1S0rcYvRcc7zvMyC5rQ4i_EDQtQSiiaFnY_Br7RwwLiYTBqT8S5egxSEi07sKmGB02ntw2cEwinw241i0GXUGzC6HQRW3hq5vQPrpXYg-j4BK9ZgaVIESxGUDufFSS9s1Bc_cVq8P87fZs_l4vXpZfawKCWucCqZailTsusrRHXNhJKSVR2mrK6QVAw2ncKNoERKXWvEetIxSHvWdkJrqijG0-Jqv3cV_NeoY-KDiVJbK5z2Y-QNYyhbRQ4KMYGkalibhWgvlMHHGHTPV8EMImw5gnz3AP7nAZm53zPG9T4MIjtoFU9ia33os73S5AP_4eQg_ofiaZPwN2PFoKs</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Kollman, Kelly</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder</title><author>Kollman, Kelly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9d689dcbf218e49adcc92b389421cd905bd35a87cce4e19f7b908f96baee8d833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>constructivist theory</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Europeanization</topic><topic>Family policy</topic><topic>Federal Republic of Germany</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movement</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Member states</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Policy Reform</topic><topic>Political movements</topic><topic>Same-sex marriage</topic><topic>same-sex unions policy</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Unions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kollman, Kelly</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Contemporary politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kollman, Kelly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary politics</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>37-53</pages><issn>1356-9775</issn><eissn>1469-3631</eissn><abstract>In a period of just under 20 years, 15 Western European countries have adopted national same-sex union (SSU) laws that legally recognize the gay and lesbian couples who chose to enter them. This rather startling case of convergent policy change has largely slipped under the radar screens of political scientists. This article argues that the European Union (EU), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and a transnational network of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender activists have played a crucial role in this policy change by creating a soft law norm for relationship recognition and disseminating this norm to policymakers in Western European states. More recently, both the EU and the ECtHR have begun mandating some minimal recognition of same-sex couples. Using Austria and Germany as comparative cases, the article posits further that Europe has had a far greater impact on national policy outcomes when its influence has been felt through the informal processes of norm diffusion and elite socialization than when it has tried to impose formal mandates through court decisions and EU directives.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13569770802674204</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-9775 |
ispartof | Contemporary politics, 2009-03, Vol.15 (1), p.37-53 |
issn | 1356-9775 1469-3631 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37072596 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Activism Austria Bisexuality constructivist theory Couples Courts Europe European Union Europeanization Family policy Federal Republic of Germany Germany Homosexuality Law lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender movement Lobbying Member states Networks Policy Reform Political movements Same-sex marriage same-sex unions policy Socialization Transnationalism Unions |
title | European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: when soft law hits harder |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=European%20institutions,%20transnational%20networks%20and%20national%20same-sex%20unions%20policy:%20when%20soft%20law%20hits%20harder&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20politics&rft.au=Kollman,%20Kelly&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=37-53&rft.issn=1356-9775&rft.eissn=1469-3631&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13569770802674204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E37072596%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37072596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |