'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection

Early strategy scholars have pointed to the importance of reflecting on moral issues within the scope of strategic management. Although strategy content and context have been discussed in relation to ethical reflection, the third aspect, strategy process, has found only little or no attention with r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business ethics 2009-01, Vol.84 (1), p.79-88
Hauptverfasser: Behnam, Michael, Rasche, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 84
creator Behnam, Michael
Rasche, Andreas
description Early strategy scholars have pointed to the importance of reflecting on moral issues within the scope of strategic management. Although strategy content and context have been discussed in relation to ethical reflection, the third aspect, strategy process, has found only little or no attention with regard to ethics. We argue that by emphasizing the process perspective one can understand the related character of strategic management and ethical reflection. We discuss this relatedness along formal, functional, and procedural similarities. Whereas formal aspects refer to the conditions under which both processes occur, functional aspects look at the role that strategy process and ethical reflection fulfill. Procedural aspects account for similarities in the nature of both processes insofar as the activities that are conducted within each process phase share common characteristics. We claim that ethical reflection can be thought of as an integrative part of strategic management – either explicitly or implicitly.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-008-9674-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37056090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40294646</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40294646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-59b33db4b9a56e979eb3adf84ee79a7a6daf39fc19825c51ce3bf143d5a4153c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtq3TAQFaGF3qb9gC4Cpotm5WZkSZa1KiGkTSChkD5WBSHL4xvf-NquRi6kq_5D_rBfUgWH25JFB84MDOecGQ5jrzi85QD6iDgoxXOAKjellrneYyuutMihNPoJWwEvdS6VlM_Yc6INpFJcrti3w-OA2acYXMR1R5GyNozb7NIFytzQZKfxuvN_919xmOndYfb7191O9LMb1pmjher67ArbHn3sxuEFe9q6nvDlw9xnX96ffj45yy8-fjg_Ob7IvSxlzJWphWhqWRunSjTaYC1c01YSURunXdm4VpjWc1MVyivuUdQtl6JRTnIlvNhnbxbfKYzfZ6Rotx157Hs34DiTFRpUCQYS8fUj4macw5B-s8kcpC54kUh8IfkwEgVs7RS6rQu3loO9D9suYdsUtr0P2-qkOVs0ASf0O8GNmzb1TBjtDytcJVO7TSgATBpdAk-YErSxVWWv4zZZFYsVJZdhjeGfH_9z_2ARbSiOYXdfQmFSxKX4Az4XpPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198047212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Behnam, Michael ; Rasche, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnam, Michael ; Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Early strategy scholars have pointed to the importance of reflecting on moral issues within the scope of strategic management. Although strategy content and context have been discussed in relation to ethical reflection, the third aspect, strategy process, has found only little or no attention with regard to ethics. We argue that by emphasizing the process perspective one can understand the related character of strategic management and ethical reflection. We discuss this relatedness along formal, functional, and procedural similarities. Whereas formal aspects refer to the conditions under which both processes occur, functional aspects look at the role that strategy process and ethical reflection fulfill. Procedural aspects account for similarities in the nature of both processes insofar as the activities that are conducted within each process phase share common characteristics. We claim that ethical reflection can be thought of as an integrative part of strategic management – either explicitly or implicitly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9674-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agency ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Corporate objectives ; Corporate strategies ; Descriptive ethics ; Discourse ethics ; Education ; Environmental ethics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethical justification ; ethical reflection ; Ethics ; Knowledge management ; Management ; moral agency ; Moral relativism ; Morality ; Morals ; Organization theory ; Philosophy ; Quality of Life Research ; Social ethics ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholder ; Stakeholders ; Strategic management ; Strategic planning ; strategy process ; strategy–ethics-link ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2009-01, Vol.84 (1), p.79-88</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-59b33db4b9a56e979eb3adf84ee79a7a6daf39fc19825c51ce3bf143d5a4153c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-59b33db4b9a56e979eb3adf84ee79a7a6daf39fc19825c51ce3bf143d5a4153c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40294646$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40294646$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4008,4024,27866,27923,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjbuset/v_3a84_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a79-88.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnam, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>Early strategy scholars have pointed to the importance of reflecting on moral issues within the scope of strategic management. Although strategy content and context have been discussed in relation to ethical reflection, the third aspect, strategy process, has found only little or no attention with regard to ethics. We argue that by emphasizing the process perspective one can understand the related character of strategic management and ethical reflection. We discuss this relatedness along formal, functional, and procedural similarities. Whereas formal aspects refer to the conditions under which both processes occur, functional aspects look at the role that strategy process and ethical reflection fulfill. Procedural aspects account for similarities in the nature of both processes insofar as the activities that are conducted within each process phase share common characteristics. We claim that ethical reflection can be thought of as an integrative part of strategic management – either explicitly or implicitly.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Corporate objectives</subject><subject>Corporate strategies</subject><subject>Descriptive ethics</subject><subject>Discourse ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethical justification</subject><subject>ethical reflection</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>moral agency</subject><subject>Moral relativism</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>strategy process</subject><subject>strategy–ethics-link</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtq3TAQFaGF3qb9gC4Cpotm5WZkSZa1KiGkTSChkD5WBSHL4xvf-NquRi6kq_5D_rBfUgWH25JFB84MDOecGQ5jrzi85QD6iDgoxXOAKjellrneYyuutMihNPoJWwEvdS6VlM_Yc6INpFJcrti3w-OA2acYXMR1R5GyNozb7NIFytzQZKfxuvN_919xmOndYfb7191O9LMb1pmjher67ArbHn3sxuEFe9q6nvDlw9xnX96ffj45yy8-fjg_Ob7IvSxlzJWphWhqWRunSjTaYC1c01YSURunXdm4VpjWc1MVyivuUdQtl6JRTnIlvNhnbxbfKYzfZ6Rotx157Hs34DiTFRpUCQYS8fUj4macw5B-s8kcpC54kUh8IfkwEgVs7RS6rQu3loO9D9suYdsUtr0P2-qkOVs0ASf0O8GNmzb1TBjtDytcJVO7TSgATBpdAk-YErSxVWWv4zZZFYsVJZdhjeGfH_9z_2ARbSiOYXdfQmFSxKX4Az4XpPk</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Behnam, Michael</creator><creator>Rasche, Andreas</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection</title><author>Behnam, Michael ; Rasche, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-59b33db4b9a56e979eb3adf84ee79a7a6daf39fc19825c51ce3bf143d5a4153c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Corporate objectives</topic><topic>Corporate strategies</topic><topic>Descriptive ethics</topic><topic>Discourse ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethical justification</topic><topic>ethical reflection</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>moral agency</topic><topic>Moral relativism</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>strategy process</topic><topic>strategy–ethics-link</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnam, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnam, Michael</au><au>Rasche, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>79-88</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>Early strategy scholars have pointed to the importance of reflecting on moral issues within the scope of strategic management. Although strategy content and context have been discussed in relation to ethical reflection, the third aspect, strategy process, has found only little or no attention with regard to ethics. We argue that by emphasizing the process perspective one can understand the related character of strategic management and ethical reflection. We discuss this relatedness along formal, functional, and procedural similarities. Whereas formal aspects refer to the conditions under which both processes occur, functional aspects look at the role that strategy process and ethical reflection fulfill. Procedural aspects account for similarities in the nature of both processes insofar as the activities that are conducted within each process phase share common characteristics. We claim that ethical reflection can be thought of as an integrative part of strategic management – either explicitly or implicitly.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-008-9674-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2009-01, Vol.84 (1), p.79-88
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37056090
source RePEc; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agency
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Corporate objectives
Corporate strategies
Descriptive ethics
Discourse ethics
Education
Environmental ethics
Ethical behavior
Ethical justification
ethical reflection
Ethics
Knowledge management
Management
moral agency
Moral relativism
Morality
Morals
Organization theory
Philosophy
Quality of Life Research
Social ethics
Social responsibility
Stakeholder
Stakeholders
Strategic management
Strategic planning
strategy process
strategy–ethics-link
Studies
title 'Are Strategists from Mars and Ethicists from Venus?' – Strategizing as Ethical Reflection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A18%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Are%20Strategists%20from%20Mars%20and%20Ethicists%20from%20Venus?'%20%E2%80%93%20Strategizing%20as%20Ethical%20Reflection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Behnam,%20Michael&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=79-88&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-008-9674-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40294646%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198047212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40294646&rfr_iscdi=true