Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences
With the enlargement of the EU agenda, an increasing number of actors contest the legitimacy of EU-level decisions in policy areas where ethical preferences are at stake. This discourse, which is articulated by mainstream political parties and civil society actors, represents a new type of political...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of common market studies 2008-12, Vol.46 (5), p.1071-1092 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1092 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1071 |
container_title | Journal of common market studies |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Leconte, Cecile |
description | With the enlargement of the EU agenda, an increasing number of actors contest the legitimacy of EU-level decisions in policy areas where ethical preferences are at stake. This discourse, which is articulated by mainstream political parties and civil society actors, represents a new type of political contestation in the Union. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37013363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37013363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_370133633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQDMoWK3_cJNb4WporXNR3FzcS6jXEkkvMZf6_XbwA4QHb3hvpTLEY1mcm6beqK3ICxHLCqtMtfcQvFgewXKiMZpkPcPCZFKiKOAHEN9b48DwE9jHJdgPQYg0UCTuSXK1HowT2v-8U4fr5dHeihD9eyZJ3WSlJ-cMk5-l0ycsta61_nv8AnN8PW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37013363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Leconte, Cecile</creator><creatorcontrib>Leconte, Cecile</creatorcontrib><description>With the enlargement of the EU agenda, an increasing number of actors contest the legitimacy of EU-level decisions in policy areas where ethical preferences are at stake. This discourse, which is articulated by mainstream political parties and civil society actors, represents a new type of political contestation in the Union. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9886</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Attitudes ; Discourse ; Ethics ; EU enlargement ; Europe ; Policy making ; Political opposition ; Preferences ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>Journal of common market studies, 2008-12, Vol.46 (5), p.1071-1092</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leconte, Cecile</creatorcontrib><title>Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences</title><title>Journal of common market studies</title><description>With the enlargement of the EU agenda, an increasing number of actors contest the legitimacy of EU-level decisions in policy areas where ethical preferences are at stake. This discourse, which is articulated by mainstream political parties and civil society actors, represents a new type of political contestation in the Union. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>EU enlargement</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political opposition</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0021-9886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQDMoWK3_cJNb4WporXNR3FzcS6jXEkkvMZf6_XbwA4QHb3hvpTLEY1mcm6beqK3ICxHLCqtMtfcQvFgewXKiMZpkPcPCZFKiKOAHEN9b48DwE9jHJdgPQYg0UCTuSXK1HowT2v-8U4fr5dHeihD9eyZJ3WSlJ-cMk5-l0ycsta61_nv8AnN8PW0</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Leconte, Cecile</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences</title><author>Leconte, Cecile</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_370133633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>EU enlargement</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political opposition</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leconte, Cecile</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leconte, Cecile</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of common market studies</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1071</spage><epage>1092</epage><pages>1071-1092</pages><issn>0021-9886</issn><abstract>With the enlargement of the EU agenda, an increasing number of actors contest the legitimacy of EU-level decisions in policy areas where ethical preferences are at stake. This discourse, which is articulated by mainstream political parties and civil society actors, represents a new type of political contestation in the Union. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9886 |
ispartof | Journal of common market studies, 2008-12, Vol.46 (5), p.1071-1092 |
issn | 0021-9886 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37013363 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Attitudes Discourse Ethics EU enlargement Europe Policy making Political opposition Preferences Social structure |
title | Opposing integration on matters of social and normative preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opposing%20integration%20on%20matters%20of%20social%20and%20normative%20preferences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20common%20market%20studies&rft.au=Leconte,%20Cecile&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1071&rft.epage=1092&rft.pages=1071-1092&rft.issn=0021-9886&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E37013363%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37013363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |