The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem
The present paper provides evidence that dominant-group members distinguish dominance framed as ingroup superiority from dominance framed as outgroup inferiority, and that ingroup superiority enhances esteem for, and thus identification with, the group more than outgroup inferiority. In Experiment 1...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2008-07, Vol.44 (4), p.1073-1081 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1081 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1073 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental social psychology |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Chow, Rosalind M. Lowery, Brian S. Knowles, Eric D. |
| description | The present paper provides evidence that dominant-group members distinguish dominance framed as ingroup superiority from dominance framed as outgroup inferiority, and that ingroup superiority enhances esteem for, and thus identification with, the group more than outgroup inferiority. In Experiment 1, Democrats report higher levels of party identification after being told that Democrats won an election than after being told that Republicans lost the election. These effects are attenuated among dominant group members whose values are in conflict with how dominance was achieved. In Experiments 2a and 2b, unearned dominance framed as ingroup superiority resulted in higher levels of White identification than unearned dominance framed as outgroup inferiority among Whites who did not value meritocracy. In contrast, Whites who valued meritocracy did not increase their levels of identification with the group. In Experiment 2b, this interactive effect on racial identification was mediated by esteem for the group. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36931505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002210310700159X</els_id><sourcerecordid>36931505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0741c9da256939731881316ff6015843bee93692d89ce3ce9bbf6c962b92b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQtRBIXEp_oKsICXYJHjtxYsQGVdAiVeqmrC3HGYOjXDvYCVW_gl_GIZcuWHRla85rNIeQC6AVUBDvx2rENFeM0rYCqChlz8gBqBQlrUXznBzyhJVAObwkr1IaKaWSMjiQ33c_sFjuQ2G1wVQEWwzh6Lz2Bj8UGzY4azGiX5yeCsx_s2ws57_HsM5FWmeMLkS3PBTaD0VYlx1w3j4Cwf9zXcoTOmyOJ80-wrQgHl-TF1ZPCc9P7xn59uXz3eV1eXN79fXy001peNctpUba1mDkoFkjJJcth64DDsJaQaHpat4jSi4kGzppkBuUfW-FkYL1kvWCn5F3u-8cw881Z6ujSwanSXsMa1JZyqGhTSa--Y84hjX6vJtiULddm2Mzie0kE0NKEa2aozvq-KCAqq0gNaqtILUVpABUriOL3p6cdTJ6sjEf3aVHJaM1k_LvBh93HuZ7_HIYVTIOc0GDi7kNNQT3VMwfTY6oug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214787813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Chow, Rosalind M. ; Lowery, Brian S. ; Knowles, Eric D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chow, Rosalind M. ; Lowery, Brian S. ; Knowles, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper provides evidence that dominant-group members distinguish dominance framed as ingroup superiority from dominance framed as outgroup inferiority, and that ingroup superiority enhances esteem for, and thus identification with, the group more than outgroup inferiority. In Experiment 1, Democrats report higher levels of party identification after being told that Democrats won an election than after being told that Republicans lost the election. These effects are attenuated among dominant group members whose values are in conflict with how dominance was achieved. In Experiments 2a and 2b, unearned dominance framed as ingroup superiority resulted in higher levels of White identification than unearned dominance framed as outgroup inferiority among Whites who did not value meritocracy. In contrast, Whites who valued meritocracy did not increase their levels of identification with the group. In Experiment 2b, this interactive effect on racial identification was mediated by esteem for the group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Authority ; Biological and medical sciences ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Groups ; Intragroup relations ; Political behavior ; Political parties ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2008-07, Vol.44 (4), p.1073-1081</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0741c9da256939731881316ff6015843bee93692d89ce3ce9bbf6c962b92b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0741c9da256939731881316ff6015843bee93692d89ce3ce9bbf6c962b92b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20429905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chow, Rosalind M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowery, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><title>The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>The present paper provides evidence that dominant-group members distinguish dominance framed as ingroup superiority from dominance framed as outgroup inferiority, and that ingroup superiority enhances esteem for, and thus identification with, the group more than outgroup inferiority. In Experiment 1, Democrats report higher levels of party identification after being told that Democrats won an election than after being told that Republicans lost the election. These effects are attenuated among dominant group members whose values are in conflict with how dominance was achieved. In Experiments 2a and 2b, unearned dominance framed as ingroup superiority resulted in higher levels of White identification than unearned dominance framed as outgroup inferiority among Whites who did not value meritocracy. In contrast, Whites who valued meritocracy did not increase their levels of identification with the group. In Experiment 2b, this interactive effect on racial identification was mediated by esteem for the group.</description><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Intragroup relations</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQtRBIXEp_oKsICXYJHjtxYsQGVdAiVeqmrC3HGYOjXDvYCVW_gl_GIZcuWHRla85rNIeQC6AVUBDvx2rENFeM0rYCqChlz8gBqBQlrUXznBzyhJVAObwkr1IaKaWSMjiQ33c_sFjuQ2G1wVQEWwzh6Lz2Bj8UGzY4azGiX5yeCsx_s2ws57_HsM5FWmeMLkS3PBTaD0VYlx1w3j4Cwf9zXcoTOmyOJ80-wrQgHl-TF1ZPCc9P7xn59uXz3eV1eXN79fXy001peNctpUba1mDkoFkjJJcth64DDsJaQaHpat4jSi4kGzppkBuUfW-FkYL1kvWCn5F3u-8cw881Z6ujSwanSXsMa1JZyqGhTSa--Y84hjX6vJtiULddm2Mzie0kE0NKEa2aozvq-KCAqq0gNaqtILUVpABUriOL3p6cdTJ6sjEf3aVHJaM1k_LvBh93HuZ7_HIYVTIOc0GDi7kNNQT3VMwfTY6oug</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Chow, Rosalind M.</creator><creator>Lowery, Brian S.</creator><creator>Knowles, Eric D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem</title><author>Chow, Rosalind M. ; Lowery, Brian S. ; Knowles, Eric D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0741c9da256939731881316ff6015843bee93692d89ce3ce9bbf6c962b92b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Intragroup relations</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chow, Rosalind M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowery, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chow, Rosalind M.</au><au>Lowery, Brian S.</au><au>Knowles, Eric D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1081</epage><pages>1073-1081</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>The present paper provides evidence that dominant-group members distinguish dominance framed as ingroup superiority from dominance framed as outgroup inferiority, and that ingroup superiority enhances esteem for, and thus identification with, the group more than outgroup inferiority. In Experiment 1, Democrats report higher levels of party identification after being told that Democrats won an election than after being told that Republicans lost the election. These effects are attenuated among dominant group members whose values are in conflict with how dominance was achieved. In Experiments 2a and 2b, unearned dominance framed as ingroup superiority resulted in higher levels of White identification than unearned dominance framed as outgroup inferiority among Whites who did not value meritocracy. In contrast, Whites who valued meritocracy did not increase their levels of identification with the group. In Experiment 2b, this interactive effect on racial identification was mediated by esteem for the group.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-1031 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental social psychology, 2008-07, Vol.44 (4), p.1073-1081 |
| issn | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36931505 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Authority Biological and medical sciences Experiments Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group dynamics Groups Intragroup relations Political behavior Political parties Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology |
| title | The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20two%20faces%20of%20dominance:%20The%20differential%20effect%20of%20ingroup%20superiority%20and%20outgroup%20inferiority%20on%20dominant-group%20identity%20and%20group%20esteem&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Chow,%20Rosalind%20M.&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1081&rft.pages=1073-1081&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36931505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214787813&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S002210310700159X&rfr_iscdi=true |