The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics
In the last years, a “codification debate” has developed among economists concerning the meaning and the empirical relevance of “tacit knowledge.” As this debate seems to have reached an impasse, we suggest a solution to take it a step further that is based on a more precise definition of “tacit kno...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial and corporate change 2007-10, Vol.16 (5), p.823-849 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 849 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 823 |
| container_title | Industrial and corporate change |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Balconi, Margherita Pozzali, Andrea Viale, Riccardo |
| description | In the last years, a “codification debate” has developed among economists concerning the meaning and the empirical relevance of “tacit knowledge.” As this debate seems to have reached an impasse, we suggest a solution to take it a step further that is based on a more precise definition of “tacit knowledge” and a clear conceptualization of codification. Moreover, as different types of tacit knowledge can be characterized, we also proceed to demonstrate that the issue of codifiability cannot be adequately addressed without accounting for these differences. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icc/dtm025 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36926162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/icc/dtm025</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1372115031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1a9e7a376cc4469850302daca2d0d58c9f20e5987379fc05f061fc6730a4e8ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFqFTEUBuAgCl6rG58gCLoQxp4kM8nEnZTaChcEqVLchJg50fTOTK5Jxtqu-iD6cn0SIyMuXLg6HPjOD-cn5DGDFwy0OAzOHQ5lAt7dIRvWyrYRsoO7ZANaQiNbze6TBzlfAAAH1W9IPvuC9Pbmh4tD8MHZEuJMB_xkC97e_KQJv4UcCg4vqaUuzg73ZbEj9clOeBnTjpZI7WzHq2ukpUalOCKNnhbrQqG7OV6OOHxGGmaK9T5OweWH5J63Y8ZHf-YBef_6-OzotNm-PXlz9GrbuLblpWFWo7JCSVd3qfsOBPDBOssHGLreac8BO90robR30HmQzDupBNgWe0RxQJ6tufsUvy6Yi5lCdjiOdsa4ZCOk5pJJXuGTf-BFXFL9KhsuFGe1KlbR8xW5FHNO6M0-hcmmK8PA_C7f1PLNWn7FT1ccl_3_XbO6kAt-_ytt2pn6iOrM6flHI-X59gNTvXknfgGmGpbB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>237212071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics</title><source>Business Source Complete (EBSCO)</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (OUP)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Balconi, Margherita ; Pozzali, Andrea ; Viale, Riccardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Balconi, Margherita ; Pozzali, Andrea ; Viale, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><description>In the last years, a “codification debate” has developed among economists concerning the meaning and the empirical relevance of “tacit knowledge.” As this debate seems to have reached an impasse, we suggest a solution to take it a step further that is based on a more precise definition of “tacit knowledge” and a clear conceptualization of codification. Moreover, as different types of tacit knowledge can be characterized, we also proceed to demonstrate that the issue of codifiability cannot be adequately addressed without accounting for these differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-6491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtm025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Business studies ; Economic knowledge ; Economic management ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economists ; Epistemology ; Information economics ; Knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Science ; Social sciences ; Sociology ; Studies ; Tacit knowledge</subject><ispartof>Industrial and corporate change, 2007-10, Vol.16 (5), p.823-849</ispartof><rights>The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved. 2007</rights><rights>The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1a9e7a376cc4469850302daca2d0d58c9f20e5987379fc05f061fc6730a4e8ee3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balconi, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzali, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viale, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><title>The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics</title><title>Industrial and corporate change</title><description>In the last years, a “codification debate” has developed among economists concerning the meaning and the empirical relevance of “tacit knowledge.” As this debate seems to have reached an impasse, we suggest a solution to take it a step further that is based on a more precise definition of “tacit knowledge” and a clear conceptualization of codification. Moreover, as different types of tacit knowledge can be characterized, we also proceed to demonstrate that the issue of codifiability cannot be adequately addressed without accounting for these differences.</description><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Economic knowledge</subject><subject>Economic management</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Information economics</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tacit knowledge</subject><issn>0960-6491</issn><issn>1464-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFqFTEUBuAgCl6rG58gCLoQxp4kM8nEnZTaChcEqVLchJg50fTOTK5Jxtqu-iD6cn0SIyMuXLg6HPjOD-cn5DGDFwy0OAzOHQ5lAt7dIRvWyrYRsoO7ZANaQiNbze6TBzlfAAAH1W9IPvuC9Pbmh4tD8MHZEuJMB_xkC97e_KQJv4UcCg4vqaUuzg73ZbEj9clOeBnTjpZI7WzHq2ukpUalOCKNnhbrQqG7OV6OOHxGGmaK9T5OweWH5J63Y8ZHf-YBef_6-OzotNm-PXlz9GrbuLblpWFWo7JCSVd3qfsOBPDBOssHGLreac8BO90robR30HmQzDupBNgWe0RxQJ6tufsUvy6Yi5lCdjiOdsa4ZCOk5pJJXuGTf-BFXFL9KhsuFGe1KlbR8xW5FHNO6M0-hcmmK8PA_C7f1PLNWn7FT1ccl_3_XbO6kAt-_ytt2pn6iOrM6flHI-X59gNTvXknfgGmGpbB</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Balconi, Margherita</creator><creator>Pozzali, Andrea</creator><creator>Viale, Riccardo</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics</title><author>Balconi, Margherita ; Pozzali, Andrea ; Viale, Riccardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1a9e7a376cc4469850302daca2d0d58c9f20e5987379fc05f061fc6730a4e8ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Economic knowledge</topic><topic>Economic management</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Information economics</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tacit knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balconi, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozzali, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viale, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balconi, Margherita</au><au>Pozzali, Andrea</au><au>Viale, Riccardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>849</epage><pages>823-849</pages><issn>0960-6491</issn><eissn>1464-3650</eissn><abstract>In the last years, a “codification debate” has developed among economists concerning the meaning and the empirical relevance of “tacit knowledge.” As this debate seems to have reached an impasse, we suggest a solution to take it a step further that is based on a more precise definition of “tacit knowledge” and a clear conceptualization of codification. Moreover, as different types of tacit knowledge can be characterized, we also proceed to demonstrate that the issue of codifiability cannot be adequately addressed without accounting for these differences.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icc/dtm025</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-6491 |
| ispartof | Industrial and corporate change, 2007-10, Vol.16 (5), p.823-849 |
| issn | 0960-6491 1464-3650 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36926162 |
| source | Business Source Complete (EBSCO); Oxford Academic Journals (OUP); PAIS Index |
| subjects | Business studies Economic knowledge Economic management Economic theory Economics Economists Epistemology Information economics Knowledge Knowledge management Science Social sciences Sociology Studies Tacit knowledge |
| title | The “codification debate” revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T17%3A43%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9Ccodification%20debate%E2%80%9D%20revisited:%20a%20conceptual%20framework%20to%20analyze%20the%20role%20of%20tacit%20knowledge%20in%20economics&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20corporate%20change&rft.au=Balconi,%20Margherita&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=849&rft.pages=823-849&rft.issn=0960-6491&rft.eissn=1464-3650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icc/dtm025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1372115031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=237212071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/icc/dtm025&rfr_iscdi=true |