Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia
Attempts to assess the results of colonial anthropology in Indonesia faced some problems, which, until recently, have not been dealt with properly. Therefore, in a newly published comprehensive history of anthropology in the Netherlands, several studies focused on the character, rather than on the s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asian Journal of Social Science 2007-01, Vol.35 (3), p.352-369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 369 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Asian Journal of Social Science |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Kommers, Jean Buskens, Léon |
description | Attempts to assess the results of colonial anthropology in Indonesia faced some problems, which, until recently, have not been dealt with properly. Therefore, in a newly published comprehensive history of anthropology in the Netherlands, several studies focused on the character, rather than on the substance of colonial anthropology. In the case of Dutch colonial representations of Indonesia, 'colonial anthropology' appears to be an assemblage of various disciplines that constituted a fragmented whole (Indologie; Dutch Indies Studies) from which today's Dutch academic anthropology emerged. However, projection of current conceptions of anthropology into the colonial past resulted in a tendency to neglect some major characteristics of early representations that are imperative for the interpretation of these representations. Besides, a rather limited familiarity amongst present-day anthropologists with the way in which Dutch colonial politics became immersed in international discourses resulted in misappraisal of an essential change in colonial knowledge: the shift from local to analytical representations, deeply affecting the portrayal of Indonesian cultures. In colonial knowledge production, emphasis moved from ethnographic particularism to essentialist conceptions like 'Knowledge of the Native'. This shift also had serious consequences for the academic position of ethnology amongst other colonial disciplines. Until recently, this misappraisal could escape notice because students of Dutch colonial anthropology were insufficiently aware of the effects on interpretation of the great variety of disciplinary discourses, so characteristic for Dutch colonial studies. Therefore, we will here concentrate on these effects and on the growing intertwinement of knowledge and politics which was directly related to the international orientation of colonial policy that became increasingly prominent after the mid-nineteenth century. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/156853107X224286 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36925037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23654467</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23654467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3616-6e8a709c4824938c6bf89bbb0a42e4596b1e98d1b58f88e29a1e951ac6cc87b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhejiYjevZhwMl6G_V57JCiIoF7QGC9NWzoZzhXbLZH_3pIRDibG0_vx_N6PPElyDkEfQoavIWWcYgiyV4QI4uwg6WxbaeyRw11OOBHHyUkIKwAgY4J3kqubpjbL3tCVripU2RtU9dK7dSzfN72i6k2qhatsKNRpcpSrMtizXewmz6Pb-fAunT2NJ8PBLNWYQZYyy1UGhCEcEYG5YTrnQmsNFEGWUME0tIIvoKY859wioWJNoTLMGJ5phLvJZbt37d1XY0MtP4tgbFmqyromyHiEQcjBvyBmAlGAswiCFjTeheBtLte--FR-IyGQW-_kb-_iyEU7sgq183seYUYJYduVaasXobbfe135DxnVjMr76VyiNzAdjx5f5EPk-y2vfVGWcuUaX0UT_37gB5xHhdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36925037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kommers, Jean ; Buskens, Léon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Jean ; Buskens, Léon</creatorcontrib><description>Attempts to assess the results of colonial anthropology in Indonesia faced some problems, which, until recently, have not been dealt with properly. Therefore, in a newly published comprehensive history of anthropology in the Netherlands, several studies focused on the character, rather than on the substance of colonial anthropology. In the case of Dutch colonial representations of Indonesia, 'colonial anthropology' appears to be an assemblage of various disciplines that constituted a fragmented whole (Indologie; Dutch Indies Studies) from which today's Dutch academic anthropology emerged. However, projection of current conceptions of anthropology into the colonial past resulted in a tendency to neglect some major characteristics of early representations that are imperative for the interpretation of these representations. Besides, a rather limited familiarity amongst present-day anthropologists with the way in which Dutch colonial politics became immersed in international discourses resulted in misappraisal of an essential change in colonial knowledge: the shift from local to analytical representations, deeply affecting the portrayal of Indonesian cultures. In colonial knowledge production, emphasis moved from ethnographic particularism to essentialist conceptions like 'Knowledge of the Native'. This shift also had serious consequences for the academic position of ethnology amongst other colonial disciplines. Until recently, this misappraisal could escape notice because students of Dutch colonial anthropology were insufficiently aware of the effects on interpretation of the great variety of disciplinary discourses, so characteristic for Dutch colonial studies. Therefore, we will here concentrate on these effects and on the growing intertwinement of knowledge and politics which was directly related to the international orientation of colonial policy that became increasingly prominent after the mid-nineteenth century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-4849</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8246</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-3857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-4849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853107X224286</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJSSAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Civil service ; Colonial history ; COLONIAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION ; COLONIAL POLICY AND PRACTICE ; Colonialism ; Cultural anthropology ; Epistemology ; Ethnography ; Ethnology ; Gaze ; HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY ; INDONESIA ; ISLAM ; Islamic law ; Linguistic anthropology ; Netherlands ; Nineteenth Century ; Perception ; Policy analysis ; Political anthropology ; REPRESENTATION ; Social Anthropology ; South Asian studies ; Southeast Asian culture ; Trends in the Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Asian Journal of Social Science, 2007-01, Vol.35 (3), p.352-369</ispartof><rights>2007 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3616-6e8a709c4824938c6bf89bbb0a42e4596b1e98d1b58f88e29a1e951ac6cc87b23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23654467$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23654467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buskens, Léon</creatorcontrib><title>Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia</title><title>Asian Journal of Social Science</title><addtitle>AJSS</addtitle><description>Attempts to assess the results of colonial anthropology in Indonesia faced some problems, which, until recently, have not been dealt with properly. Therefore, in a newly published comprehensive history of anthropology in the Netherlands, several studies focused on the character, rather than on the substance of colonial anthropology. In the case of Dutch colonial representations of Indonesia, 'colonial anthropology' appears to be an assemblage of various disciplines that constituted a fragmented whole (Indologie; Dutch Indies Studies) from which today's Dutch academic anthropology emerged. However, projection of current conceptions of anthropology into the colonial past resulted in a tendency to neglect some major characteristics of early representations that are imperative for the interpretation of these representations. Besides, a rather limited familiarity amongst present-day anthropologists with the way in which Dutch colonial politics became immersed in international discourses resulted in misappraisal of an essential change in colonial knowledge: the shift from local to analytical representations, deeply affecting the portrayal of Indonesian cultures. In colonial knowledge production, emphasis moved from ethnographic particularism to essentialist conceptions like 'Knowledge of the Native'. This shift also had serious consequences for the academic position of ethnology amongst other colonial disciplines. Until recently, this misappraisal could escape notice because students of Dutch colonial anthropology were insufficiently aware of the effects on interpretation of the great variety of disciplinary discourses, so characteristic for Dutch colonial studies. Therefore, we will here concentrate on these effects and on the growing intertwinement of knowledge and politics which was directly related to the international orientation of colonial policy that became increasingly prominent after the mid-nineteenth century.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Colonial history</subject><subject>COLONIAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION</subject><subject>COLONIAL POLICY AND PRACTICE</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Gaze</subject><subject>HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY</subject><subject>INDONESIA</subject><subject>ISLAM</subject><subject>Islamic law</subject><subject>Linguistic anthropology</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nineteenth Century</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Political anthropology</subject><subject>REPRESENTATION</subject><subject>Social Anthropology</subject><subject>South Asian studies</subject><subject>Southeast Asian culture</subject><subject>Trends in the Social Sciences</subject><issn>1568-4849</issn><issn>0303-8246</issn><issn>1568-5314</issn><issn>2212-3857</issn><issn>1568-4849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhejiYjevZhwMl6G_V57JCiIoF7QGC9NWzoZzhXbLZH_3pIRDibG0_vx_N6PPElyDkEfQoavIWWcYgiyV4QI4uwg6WxbaeyRw11OOBHHyUkIKwAgY4J3kqubpjbL3tCVripU2RtU9dK7dSzfN72i6k2qhatsKNRpcpSrMtizXewmz6Pb-fAunT2NJ8PBLNWYQZYyy1UGhCEcEYG5YTrnQmsNFEGWUME0tIIvoKY859wioWJNoTLMGJ5phLvJZbt37d1XY0MtP4tgbFmqyromyHiEQcjBvyBmAlGAswiCFjTeheBtLte--FR-IyGQW-_kb-_iyEU7sgq183seYUYJYduVaasXobbfe135DxnVjMr76VyiNzAdjx5f5EPk-y2vfVGWcuUaX0UT_37gB5xHhdQ</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Kommers, Jean</creator><creator>Buskens, Léon</creator><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia</title><author>Kommers, Jean ; Buskens, Léon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3616-6e8a709c4824938c6bf89bbb0a42e4596b1e98d1b58f88e29a1e951ac6cc87b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Colonial history</topic><topic>COLONIAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION</topic><topic>COLONIAL POLICY AND PRACTICE</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Gaze</topic><topic>HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY</topic><topic>INDONESIA</topic><topic>ISLAM</topic><topic>Islamic law</topic><topic>Linguistic anthropology</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nineteenth Century</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Political anthropology</topic><topic>REPRESENTATION</topic><topic>Social Anthropology</topic><topic>South Asian studies</topic><topic>Southeast Asian culture</topic><topic>Trends in the Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kommers, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buskens, Léon</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Asian Journal of Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kommers, Jean</au><au>Buskens, Léon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia</atitle><jtitle>Asian Journal of Social Science</jtitle><addtitle>AJSS</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>352-369</pages><issn>1568-4849</issn><issn>0303-8246</issn><eissn>1568-5314</eissn><eissn>2212-3857</eissn><eissn>1568-4849</eissn><coden>SJSSAX</coden><abstract>Attempts to assess the results of colonial anthropology in Indonesia faced some problems, which, until recently, have not been dealt with properly. Therefore, in a newly published comprehensive history of anthropology in the Netherlands, several studies focused on the character, rather than on the substance of colonial anthropology. In the case of Dutch colonial representations of Indonesia, 'colonial anthropology' appears to be an assemblage of various disciplines that constituted a fragmented whole (Indologie; Dutch Indies Studies) from which today's Dutch academic anthropology emerged. However, projection of current conceptions of anthropology into the colonial past resulted in a tendency to neglect some major characteristics of early representations that are imperative for the interpretation of these representations. Besides, a rather limited familiarity amongst present-day anthropologists with the way in which Dutch colonial politics became immersed in international discourses resulted in misappraisal of an essential change in colonial knowledge: the shift from local to analytical representations, deeply affecting the portrayal of Indonesian cultures. In colonial knowledge production, emphasis moved from ethnographic particularism to essentialist conceptions like 'Knowledge of the Native'. This shift also had serious consequences for the academic position of ethnology amongst other colonial disciplines. Until recently, this misappraisal could escape notice because students of Dutch colonial anthropology were insufficiently aware of the effects on interpretation of the great variety of disciplinary discourses, so characteristic for Dutch colonial studies. Therefore, we will here concentrate on these effects and on the growing intertwinement of knowledge and politics which was directly related to the international orientation of colonial policy that became increasingly prominent after the mid-nineteenth century.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/156853107X224286</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-4849 |
ispartof | Asian Journal of Social Science, 2007-01, Vol.35 (3), p.352-369 |
issn | 1568-4849 0303-8246 1568-5314 2212-3857 1568-4849 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36925037 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anthropology Civil service Colonial history COLONIAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION COLONIAL POLICY AND PRACTICE Colonialism Cultural anthropology Epistemology Ethnography Ethnology Gaze HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY INDONESIA ISLAM Islamic law Linguistic anthropology Netherlands Nineteenth Century Perception Policy analysis Political anthropology REPRESENTATION Social Anthropology South Asian studies Southeast Asian culture Trends in the Social Sciences |
title | Dutch Colonial Anthropology in Indonesia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A56%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dutch%20Colonial%20Anthropology%20in%20Indonesia&rft.jtitle=Asian%20Journal%20of%20Social%20Science&rft.au=Kommers,%20Jean&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=352-369&rft.issn=1568-4849&rft.eissn=1568-5314&rft.coden=SJSSAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853107X224286&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23654467%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36925037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23654467&rfr_iscdi=true |