Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy
One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economica (London) 2008-05, Vol.75 (298), p.362-383 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 383 |
---|---|
container_issue | 298 |
container_start_page | 362 |
container_title | Economica (London) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | BENZ, MATTHIAS FREY, BRUNO S. |
description | One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-employment as an important case of independence, it is shown that the self-employed derive higher satisfaction from work than those employed in organizations, irrespective of income gained or hours worked. This is evidence for procedural utility: people value not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36897146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40071755</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40071755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6094-bcfde7c2377496d75194cadcc235ad205e56f2e60bb7f0ad39f3bdcd68acb6863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyBZHLglOHFsJ0gcllK6Ky1w2CIOHEaOPWEd0qRrJ0v773EI6oETc7Ctee8bjx4hNGNpFutNm2aFLBPGuUhzxlTKmKiK9PiIrM7CY7JiLOMJK3L1lDwLoWWxRK5W5Pt7dP0Pet1bPGA8-pG6QDXdetQj3d1F8S29neoWzegekG4edDfp0Q19oENDb7Frks3-0A2n_czq3tIrh157c3d6Tp40ugv44u99Qb5-3OzWV8nNl-31-vImMZJVRVKbxqIyOVeqqKRVIqsKo62JHaFtzgQK2eQoWV2rhmnLq4bX1lhZalPLUvIL8nqZe_DD_YRhhL0LBrtO9zhMAbgsKxXDiMZX_xjbYfJ93A3iX2UppMyjqVxMxg8heGzg4N1e-xNkDObIoYU5WZiThTly-BM5HCP6bkF_uQ5P_83BZr2-jK_Iv1z4NoyDP_NF9GZKiKgni-7CiMezrv1PkIorAd8-b2FXxPnqQwaf-G97tp_h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235885662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>BENZ, MATTHIAS ; FREY, BRUNO S.</creator><creatorcontrib>BENZ, MATTHIAS ; FREY, BRUNO S.</creatorcontrib><description>One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-employment as an important case of independence, it is shown that the self-employed derive higher satisfaction from work than those employed in organizations, irrespective of income gained or hours worked. This is evidence for procedural utility: people value not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Economic surveys ; Economic utility ; Employees ; Employment ; Happiness ; Hierarchy ; Job satisfaction ; Labour economics ; Linear regression ; Self employment ; Self-employed workers ; Self-perception ; Studies ; Utility functions ; Well-being ; Wellbeing ; Work hours ; Working capital</subject><ispartof>Economica (London), 2008-05, Vol.75 (298), p.362-383</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 The London School of Economics and Political Science</rights><rights>The London School of Economics and Political Science 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6094-bcfde7c2377496d75194cadcc235ad205e56f2e60bb7f0ad39f3bdcd68acb6863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6094-bcfde7c2377496d75194cadcc235ad205e56f2e60bb7f0ad39f3bdcd68acb6863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40071755$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40071755$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BENZ, MATTHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FREY, BRUNO S.</creatorcontrib><title>Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy</title><title>Economica (London)</title><description>One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-employment as an important case of independence, it is shown that the self-employed derive higher satisfaction from work than those employed in organizations, irrespective of income gained or hours worked. This is evidence for procedural utility: people value not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to outcomes.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>Economic utility</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Labour economics</subject><subject>Linear regression</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Self-employed workers</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Well-being</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><subject>Work hours</subject><subject>Working capital</subject><issn>0013-0427</issn><issn>1468-0335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEGP0zAQhS0EEmXhJyBZHLglOHFsJ0gcllK6Ky1w2CIOHEaOPWEd0qRrJ0v773EI6oETc7Ctee8bjx4hNGNpFutNm2aFLBPGuUhzxlTKmKiK9PiIrM7CY7JiLOMJK3L1lDwLoWWxRK5W5Pt7dP0Pet1bPGA8-pG6QDXdetQj3d1F8S29neoWzegekG4edDfp0Q19oENDb7Frks3-0A2n_czq3tIrh157c3d6Tp40ugv44u99Qb5-3OzWV8nNl-31-vImMZJVRVKbxqIyOVeqqKRVIqsKo62JHaFtzgQK2eQoWV2rhmnLq4bX1lhZalPLUvIL8nqZe_DD_YRhhL0LBrtO9zhMAbgsKxXDiMZX_xjbYfJ93A3iX2UppMyjqVxMxg8heGzg4N1e-xNkDObIoYU5WZiThTly-BM5HCP6bkF_uQ5P_83BZr2-jK_Iv1z4NoyDP_NF9GZKiKgni-7CiMezrv1PkIorAd8-b2FXxPnqQwaf-G97tp_h</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>BENZ, MATTHIAS</creator><creator>FREY, BRUNO S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>London School of Economics and Political Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy</title><author>BENZ, MATTHIAS ; FREY, BRUNO S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6094-bcfde7c2377496d75194cadcc235ad205e56f2e60bb7f0ad39f3bdcd68acb6863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>Economic utility</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Labour economics</topic><topic>Linear regression</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Self-employed workers</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Well-being</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><topic>Work hours</topic><topic>Working capital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BENZ, MATTHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FREY, BRUNO S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BENZ, MATTHIAS</au><au>FREY, BRUNO S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy</atitle><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>298</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>362-383</pages><issn>0013-0427</issn><eissn>1468-0335</eissn><abstract>One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-employment as an important case of independence, it is shown that the self-employed derive higher satisfaction from work than those employed in organizations, irrespective of income gained or hours worked. This is evidence for procedural utility: people value not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0427 |
ispartof | Economica (London), 2008-05, Vol.75 (298), p.362-383 |
issn | 0013-0427 1468-0335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36897146 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Decision making Economic surveys Economic utility Employees Employment Happiness Hierarchy Job satisfaction Labour economics Linear regression Self employment Self-employed workers Self-perception Studies Utility functions Well-being Wellbeing Work hours Working capital |
title | Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A38%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Being%20Independent%20is%20a%20Great%20Thing:%20Subjective%20Evaluations%20of%20Self-Employment%20and%20Hierarchy&rft.jtitle=Economica%20(London)&rft.au=BENZ,%20MATTHIAS&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=298&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=362-383&rft.issn=0013-0427&rft.eissn=1468-0335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40071755%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235885662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40071755&rfr_iscdi=true |