Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making

Given the recent ethics scandals in the United States, there has been a renewed focus on understanding the antecedents to ethical decision-making in the research literature. Since ethical norms and standards of behavior are not universally consistent, an individual's choice of referent may exer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business ethics 2007-10, Vol.75 (3), p.239-252
Hauptverfasser: Westerman, James W., Beekun, Rafik I., Stedham, Yvonne, Yamamura, Jeanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 3
container_start_page 239
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 75
creator Westerman, James W.
Beekun, Rafik I.
Stedham, Yvonne
Yamamura, Jeanne
description Given the recent ethics scandals in the United States, there has been a renewed focus on understanding the antecedents to ethical decision-making in the research literature. Since ethical norms and standards of behavior are not universally consistent, an individual's choice of referent may exert a large influence on his/her ethical decision-making. This study used a social identity theory lens to empirically examine the relative influence of the macro- and micro-level variables of national culture and peers on an individual's intention to behave ethically. Our sample consisted of respondents from Germany, Italy, and Japan. The results indicated that both national culture and peers were found to act as significant referents in ethical decision-making dilemmas. Although peers exerted a much stronger influence on an individual's ethical decision-making, the impact of peers varied depending on the national culture levels of individualism and power distance.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-006-9250-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36881349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25123991</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25123991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ff0572349cc797ac7606ecd3d97918ebf29e727b1dc7222f9f99c30e2b145f143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEuP1DAQhC0EEsPCD-CAFHHgFnDbcTzmthqWl5bHYTlbHk-bzWwmCW5npfx7ehS0ByxX27KqPsklxEuQb0FK-45AGgO1lG3tlJH18khswFhdy9bZx2IjobV1Y5rmqXhGdJS8DDQbcfMTMVN1z2Om6nso3TiEvtrNfZkzvq8uB96hX6ijakx8LxjxgEOhqozVVbntIts_YOyIk_W3cNcNv5-LJyn0hC_-nRfi18erm93n-vrHpy-7y-s6aqdKnZI0VunGxWidDdG2ssV40AdnHWxxn5RDq-weDtEqpZJLzkUtUe2hMQkafSHerNwpj39mpOJPHUXs-zDgOJPX7XYLzGfj6_-Mx3HO_C_y4LYSmGXYBKsp5pEoY_JT7k4hLx6kP5fs15I9l-zPJfuFM1_XTMYJ40PgLkzH_UxY_L3XwRoeC0udITp0LM2azk_aeWWUvy0nhr1aYUcqY36AKQPscqD_AjIAkaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198011435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Westerman, James W. ; Beekun, Rafik I. ; Stedham, Yvonne ; Yamamura, Jeanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Westerman, James W. ; Beekun, Rafik I. ; Stedham, Yvonne ; Yamamura, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><description>Given the recent ethics scandals in the United States, there has been a renewed focus on understanding the antecedents to ethical decision-making in the research literature. Since ethical norms and standards of behavior are not universally consistent, an individual's choice of referent may exert a large influence on his/her ethical decision-making. This study used a social identity theory lens to empirically examine the relative influence of the macro- and micro-level variables of national culture and peers on an individual's intention to behave ethically. Our sample consisted of respondents from Germany, Italy, and Japan. The results indicated that both national culture and peers were found to act as significant referents in ethical decision-making dilemmas. Although peers exerted a much stronger influence on an individual's ethical decision-making, the impact of peers varied depending on the national culture levels of individualism and power distance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9250-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>antecedents ; Behavior ; Business ethics ; Collectivism ; College professors ; Comparative analysis ; Cultural differences ; Decision making ; Employees ; Ethical behavior ; Ethical codes ; Ethics ; Identity theory ; Individual ethics ; Individualism ; Japanese culture ; Knowledge management ; National culture ; Peer groups ; Peers ; Power ; power distance ; Referents ; Scandals ; Social behavior ; Social ethics ; Social identity ; social identity theory ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2007-10, Vol.75 (3), p.239-252</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ff0572349cc797ac7606ecd3d97918ebf29e727b1dc7222f9f99c30e2b145f143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ff0572349cc797ac7606ecd3d97918ebf29e727b1dc7222f9f99c30e2b145f143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25123991$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25123991$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4009,27871,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjbuset/v_3a75_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a239-252.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Westerman, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beekun, Rafik I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stedham, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamura, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><title>Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><description>Given the recent ethics scandals in the United States, there has been a renewed focus on understanding the antecedents to ethical decision-making in the research literature. Since ethical norms and standards of behavior are not universally consistent, an individual's choice of referent may exert a large influence on his/her ethical decision-making. This study used a social identity theory lens to empirically examine the relative influence of the macro- and micro-level variables of national culture and peers on an individual's intention to behave ethically. Our sample consisted of respondents from Germany, Italy, and Japan. The results indicated that both national culture and peers were found to act as significant referents in ethical decision-making dilemmas. Although peers exerted a much stronger influence on an individual's ethical decision-making, the impact of peers varied depending on the national culture levels of individualism and power distance.</description><subject>antecedents</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Identity theory</subject><subject>Individual ethics</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Japanese culture</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>National culture</subject><subject>Peer groups</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>power distance</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>social identity theory</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEuP1DAQhC0EEsPCD-CAFHHgFnDbcTzmthqWl5bHYTlbHk-bzWwmCW5npfx7ehS0ByxX27KqPsklxEuQb0FK-45AGgO1lG3tlJH18khswFhdy9bZx2IjobV1Y5rmqXhGdJS8DDQbcfMTMVN1z2Om6nso3TiEvtrNfZkzvq8uB96hX6ijakx8LxjxgEOhqozVVbntIts_YOyIk_W3cNcNv5-LJyn0hC_-nRfi18erm93n-vrHpy-7y-s6aqdKnZI0VunGxWidDdG2ssV40AdnHWxxn5RDq-weDtEqpZJLzkUtUe2hMQkafSHerNwpj39mpOJPHUXs-zDgOJPX7XYLzGfj6_-Mx3HO_C_y4LYSmGXYBKsp5pEoY_JT7k4hLx6kP5fs15I9l-zPJfuFM1_XTMYJ40PgLkzH_UxY_L3XwRoeC0udITp0LM2azk_aeWWUvy0nhr1aYUcqY36AKQPscqD_AjIAkaY</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Westerman, James W.</creator><creator>Beekun, Rafik I.</creator><creator>Stedham, Yvonne</creator><creator>Yamamura, Jeanne</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making</title><author>Westerman, James W. ; Beekun, Rafik I. ; Stedham, Yvonne ; Yamamura, Jeanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-ff0572349cc797ac7606ecd3d97918ebf29e727b1dc7222f9f99c30e2b145f143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>antecedents</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Identity theory</topic><topic>Individual ethics</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Japanese culture</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>National culture</topic><topic>Peer groups</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>power distance</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>social identity theory</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Westerman, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beekun, Rafik I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stedham, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamura, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Westerman, James W.</au><au>Beekun, Rafik I.</au><au>Stedham, Yvonne</au><au>Yamamura, Jeanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>239-252</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>Given the recent ethics scandals in the United States, there has been a renewed focus on understanding the antecedents to ethical decision-making in the research literature. Since ethical norms and standards of behavior are not universally consistent, an individual's choice of referent may exert a large influence on his/her ethical decision-making. This study used a social identity theory lens to empirically examine the relative influence of the macro- and micro-level variables of national culture and peers on an individual's intention to behave ethically. Our sample consisted of respondents from Germany, Italy, and Japan. The results indicated that both national culture and peers were found to act as significant referents in ethical decision-making dilemmas. Although peers exerted a much stronger influence on an individual's ethical decision-making, the impact of peers varied depending on the national culture levels of individualism and power distance.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-006-9250-y</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2007-10, Vol.75 (3), p.239-252
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36881349
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects antecedents
Behavior
Business ethics
Collectivism
College professors
Comparative analysis
Cultural differences
Decision making
Employees
Ethical behavior
Ethical codes
Ethics
Identity theory
Individual ethics
Individualism
Japanese culture
Knowledge management
National culture
Peer groups
Peers
Power
power distance
Referents
Scandals
Social behavior
Social ethics
Social identity
social identity theory
Studies
title Peers versus National Culture: An Analysis of Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T22%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peers%20versus%20National%20Culture:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Antecedents%20to%20Ethical%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Westerman,%20James%20W.&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=239-252&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-006-9250-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25123991%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198011435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25123991&rfr_iscdi=true