The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate
Debate around the ecologically noble savage represents two markedly different research threads. The first addresses the issue of conservation among native peoples and narrowly focuses on case studies of resource use of ethnographic, archaeological, or historic sources. The second thread is broader a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annual review of anthropology 2007-01, Vol.36 (1), p.177-190 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 190 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 177 |
| container_title | Annual review of anthropology |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Hames, Raymond |
| description | Debate around the ecologically noble savage represents two markedly different research threads. The first addresses the issue of conservation among native peoples and narrowly focuses on case studies of resource use of ethnographic, archaeological, or historic sources. The second thread is broader and more humanistic and political in orientation and considers the concept of ecological nobility in terms of identity, ecological knowledge, ideology, and the deployment of ecological nobility as a political tool by native peoples and conservation groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36878819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25064951</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25064951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-6efe09e7e74906b7a35e6d906c6a8ce8987e58b17f8a70dc0c4cd7bc3eacf6353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKA0EQRRtRMD4-QQjiYzVj9fR7JRLjA4IujOump1NjEibT2j0R_HsnTFBw46oK6nAvdQi5pJBTyuWVa5p1xM_cNe08hpyJHDRVIHJaMFbQHTKggouMFwZ2yQBA80wKBfvkIKUlADDJ5ICcTec4HPtQh7eFd3X9NXwKZY3DF_fp3nB4i6Vr8YjsVa5OeLydh-T1bjwdPWST5_vH0c0kc1yJNpNYIRhUqLgBWSrHBMpZt3rptEdttEKhS6oq7RTMPHjuZ6r0DJ2vJBPskFz0ue8xfKwxtXa1SB7r2jUY1skyqZXW1PwLFiA3nOzA0z_gMqxj0z1hqTHKgDKsg657yMeQUsTKvsfFysUvS8FuXNuta9u7tkzY3rXtXXcJ59salzqLVXSNX6TfGFMAV2zTdNJzy9SG-HMvBEhuBGXfRlKMbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199790793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate</title><source>Annual Reviews</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hames, Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Hames, Raymond</creatorcontrib><description>Debate around the ecologically noble savage represents two markedly different research threads. The first addresses the issue of conservation among native peoples and narrowly focuses on case studies of resource use of ethnographic, archaeological, or historic sources. The second thread is broader and more humanistic and political in orientation and considers the concept of ecological nobility in terms of identity, ecological knowledge, ideology, and the deployment of ecological nobility as a political tool by native peoples and conservation groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARAPCW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Anthropological analysis ; Anthropological research ; Anthropology ; Biodiversity conservation ; Case studies ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Ecological sustainability ; Economics ; Environmental conservation ; Ethnology ; Habitat conservation ; Human ecology ; Human ecology, environment ; Hunting ; Hunting, fishing, gathering ; Ideology ; Indigenous peoples ; Morphological source materials ; Native Americans ; Native peoples ; Nature conservation ; Nobility ; Politics ; Resource allocation ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2007-01, Vol.36 (1), p.177-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Annual Reviews</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-6efe09e7e74906b7a35e6d906c6a8ce8987e58b17f8a70dc0c4cd7bc3eacf6353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-6efe09e7e74906b7a35e6d906c6a8ce8987e58b17f8a70dc0c4cd7bc3eacf6353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25064951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25064951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4167,27903,27904,33753,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19204733$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hames, Raymond</creatorcontrib><title>The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>Debate around the ecologically noble savage represents two markedly different research threads. The first addresses the issue of conservation among native peoples and narrowly focuses on case studies of resource use of ethnographic, archaeological, or historic sources. The second thread is broader and more humanistic and political in orientation and considers the concept of ecological nobility in terms of identity, ecological knowledge, ideology, and the deployment of ecological nobility as a political tool by native peoples and conservation groups.</description><subject>Anthropological analysis</subject><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Human ecology, environment</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Hunting, fishing, gathering</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Morphological source materials</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Nobility</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKA0EQRRtRMD4-QQjiYzVj9fR7JRLjA4IujOump1NjEibT2j0R_HsnTFBw46oK6nAvdQi5pJBTyuWVa5p1xM_cNe08hpyJHDRVIHJaMFbQHTKggouMFwZ2yQBA80wKBfvkIKUlADDJ5ICcTec4HPtQh7eFd3X9NXwKZY3DF_fp3nB4i6Vr8YjsVa5OeLydh-T1bjwdPWST5_vH0c0kc1yJNpNYIRhUqLgBWSrHBMpZt3rptEdttEKhS6oq7RTMPHjuZ6r0DJ2vJBPskFz0ue8xfKwxtXa1SB7r2jUY1skyqZXW1PwLFiA3nOzA0z_gMqxj0z1hqTHKgDKsg657yMeQUsTKvsfFysUvS8FuXNuta9u7tkzY3rXtXXcJ59salzqLVXSNX6TfGFMAV2zTdNJzy9SG-HMvBEhuBGXfRlKMbA</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Hames, Raymond</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate</title><author>Hames, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-6efe09e7e74906b7a35e6d906c6a8ce8987e58b17f8a70dc0c4cd7bc3eacf6353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anthropological analysis</topic><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Human ecology, environment</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Hunting, fishing, gathering</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Morphological source materials</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Nobility</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hames, Raymond</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hames, Raymond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>177-190</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><coden>ARAPCW</coden><abstract>Debate around the ecologically noble savage represents two markedly different research threads. The first addresses the issue of conservation among native peoples and narrowly focuses on case studies of resource use of ethnographic, archaeological, or historic sources. The second thread is broader and more humanistic and political in orientation and considers the concept of ecological nobility in terms of identity, ecological knowledge, ideology, and the deployment of ecological nobility as a political tool by native peoples and conservation groups.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto, CA</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0084-6570 |
| ispartof | Annual review of anthropology, 2007-01, Vol.36 (1), p.177-190 |
| issn | 0084-6570 1545-4290 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36878819 |
| source | Annual Reviews; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Anthropological analysis Anthropological research Anthropology Biodiversity conservation Case studies Conservation Conservation biology Ecological sustainability Economics Environmental conservation Ethnology Habitat conservation Human ecology Human ecology, environment Hunting Hunting, fishing, gathering Ideology Indigenous peoples Morphological source materials Native Americans Native peoples Nature conservation Nobility Politics Resource allocation Sustainable agriculture |
| title | The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ecologically%20Noble%20Savage%20Debate&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Hames,%20Raymond&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=177-190&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft.coden=ARAPCW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25064951%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199790793&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25064951&rfr_iscdi=true |