Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs
An analysis of 179 junior exploration floats, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) between July 2001 and June 2006, helped to build a basic understanding of the strategy and business structure of these companies. The “typical” junior explorer raised A$4 million at initial public offeri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resources policy 2007-12, Vol.32 (4), p.159-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Resources policy |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Kreuzer, Oliver P. Etheridge, Michael A. Guj, Pietro |
description | An analysis of 179 junior exploration floats, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) between July 2001 and June 2006, helped to build a basic understanding of the strategy and business structure of these companies. The “typical” junior explorer raised A$4 million at initial public offering (IPO) to finance a 2-year, mainly greenfields exploration program. The capital raised at IPO entitled its investors to approximately half of the company, with the balance in the hands of the promoters, vendors and/or seed capital investors. Of the A$4 million raised at IPO, it intended to spend approximately two-thirds on exploration, while the remainder was absorbed in corporate overheads and the costs of the IPO. Once these were paid, ongoing corporate overheads averaged approximately 28% of its total operational expenditure. However, given an average total annual expenditure of approximately A$2.6 million, most juniors held insufficient capital reserves to meet operational costs beyond a time frame of 2 years. As at October 2006, 9% of the companies were in the process of mine construction, whereas 6% had made it to producer status. The lead time from listing to production ranged from 1.5 to 53 months, giving a median of 28 months. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.08.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36814263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301420707000530</els_id><sourcerecordid>31891397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ed8617a161eb3de604a525565f7cee4da1513c23e581976e180e5d7bf0cb37d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1O3DAUhS3USp1SnqFZsSLh3jj-yXKE-gNCgkVZWx7nRjjKxKmdoLLrO_QN-yT1MBVbFud6850j62PsM0KFgPJyqCKlsMY5jFUNoCrQFQCesA1qxUslG3zHNsABy6YG9YF9TGkAAKG03LD77ZqWaEdvp2JYJx9iQb_mMUS7-DAV_Rjski6KPIx_f_8BeVHYqSuWR_Kx8Pt59O4FTEWfm9f3d-kTe9_bMdHZ__eUPXz98uPqe3l79-36antbOgFyKanTEpVFibTjHUlorKiFkKJXjqjpLArkruYkNLZKEmog0aldD27HVdfyU3Z-3J1j-LlSWszeJ0fjaCcKazJcamxqyd8GUbfIW5VBdQRdDClF6s0c_d7GZ4NgDqrNYF5Vm4NqA9pkMbl5c2xGmsm91ohoOLDePBlueZ3Pc85Lk1uf0-TMOShag7o2j8s-j22PY5TtPXmKJjlPk6POR3KL6YJ_80P_ADNzpYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31891397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kreuzer, Oliver P. ; Etheridge, Michael A. ; Guj, Pietro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, Oliver P. ; Etheridge, Michael A. ; Guj, Pietro</creatorcontrib><description>An analysis of 179 junior exploration floats, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) between July 2001 and June 2006, helped to build a basic understanding of the strategy and business structure of these companies. The “typical” junior explorer raised A$4 million at initial public offering (IPO) to finance a 2-year, mainly greenfields exploration program. The capital raised at IPO entitled its investors to approximately half of the company, with the balance in the hands of the promoters, vendors and/or seed capital investors. Of the A$4 million raised at IPO, it intended to spend approximately two-thirds on exploration, while the remainder was absorbed in corporate overheads and the costs of the IPO. Once these were paid, ongoing corporate overheads averaged approximately 28% of its total operational expenditure. However, given an average total annual expenditure of approximately A$2.6 million, most juniors held insufficient capital reserves to meet operational costs beyond a time frame of 2 years. As at October 2006, 9% of the companies were in the process of mine construction, whereas 6% had made it to producer status. The lead time from listing to production ranged from 1.5 to 53 months, giving a median of 28 months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.08.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Australian Securities exchange ; Australian securities exchange (ASX) ; Capital formation ; Capital structure ; Financial performance ; Financial research ; Initial public offering ; Initial public offering (IPO) ; Junior mineral exploration company ; Stock exchange ; Stock prices ; Strategic planning ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Resources policy, 2007-12, Vol.32 (4), p.159-182</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ed8617a161eb3de604a525565f7cee4da1513c23e581976e180e5d7bf0cb37d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ed8617a161eb3de604a525565f7cee4da1513c23e581976e180e5d7bf0cb37d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420707000530$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejrpoli/v_3a32_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a159-182.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etheridge, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guj, Pietro</creatorcontrib><title>Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs</title><title>Resources policy</title><description>An analysis of 179 junior exploration floats, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) between July 2001 and June 2006, helped to build a basic understanding of the strategy and business structure of these companies. The “typical” junior explorer raised A$4 million at initial public offering (IPO) to finance a 2-year, mainly greenfields exploration program. The capital raised at IPO entitled its investors to approximately half of the company, with the balance in the hands of the promoters, vendors and/or seed capital investors. Of the A$4 million raised at IPO, it intended to spend approximately two-thirds on exploration, while the remainder was absorbed in corporate overheads and the costs of the IPO. Once these were paid, ongoing corporate overheads averaged approximately 28% of its total operational expenditure. However, given an average total annual expenditure of approximately A$2.6 million, most juniors held insufficient capital reserves to meet operational costs beyond a time frame of 2 years. As at October 2006, 9% of the companies were in the process of mine construction, whereas 6% had made it to producer status. The lead time from listing to production ranged from 1.5 to 53 months, giving a median of 28 months.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australian Securities exchange</subject><subject>Australian securities exchange (ASX)</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Financial research</subject><subject>Initial public offering</subject><subject>Initial public offering (IPO)</subject><subject>Junior mineral exploration company</subject><subject>Stock exchange</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0301-4207</issn><issn>1873-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1O3DAUhS3USp1SnqFZsSLh3jj-yXKE-gNCgkVZWx7nRjjKxKmdoLLrO_QN-yT1MBVbFud6850j62PsM0KFgPJyqCKlsMY5jFUNoCrQFQCesA1qxUslG3zHNsABy6YG9YF9TGkAAKG03LD77ZqWaEdvp2JYJx9iQb_mMUS7-DAV_Rjski6KPIx_f_8BeVHYqSuWR_Kx8Pt59O4FTEWfm9f3d-kTe9_bMdHZ__eUPXz98uPqe3l79-36antbOgFyKanTEpVFibTjHUlorKiFkKJXjqjpLArkruYkNLZKEmog0aldD27HVdfyU3Z-3J1j-LlSWszeJ0fjaCcKazJcamxqyd8GUbfIW5VBdQRdDClF6s0c_d7GZ4NgDqrNYF5Vm4NqA9pkMbl5c2xGmsm91ohoOLDePBlueZ3Pc85Lk1uf0-TMOShag7o2j8s-j22PY5TtPXmKJjlPk6POR3KL6YJ_80P_ADNzpYM</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Kreuzer, Oliver P.</creator><creator>Etheridge, Michael A.</creator><creator>Guj, Pietro</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs</title><author>Kreuzer, Oliver P. ; Etheridge, Michael A. ; Guj, Pietro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ed8617a161eb3de604a525565f7cee4da1513c23e581976e180e5d7bf0cb37d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australian Securities exchange</topic><topic>Australian securities exchange (ASX)</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Financial research</topic><topic>Initial public offering</topic><topic>Initial public offering (IPO)</topic><topic>Junior mineral exploration company</topic><topic>Stock exchange</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etheridge, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guj, Pietro</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreuzer, Oliver P.</au><au>Etheridge, Michael A.</au><au>Guj, Pietro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs</atitle><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>159-182</pages><issn>0301-4207</issn><eissn>1873-7641</eissn><abstract>An analysis of 179 junior exploration floats, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) between July 2001 and June 2006, helped to build a basic understanding of the strategy and business structure of these companies. The “typical” junior explorer raised A$4 million at initial public offering (IPO) to finance a 2-year, mainly greenfields exploration program. The capital raised at IPO entitled its investors to approximately half of the company, with the balance in the hands of the promoters, vendors and/or seed capital investors. Of the A$4 million raised at IPO, it intended to spend approximately two-thirds on exploration, while the remainder was absorbed in corporate overheads and the costs of the IPO. Once these were paid, ongoing corporate overheads averaged approximately 28% of its total operational expenditure. However, given an average total annual expenditure of approximately A$2.6 million, most juniors held insufficient capital reserves to meet operational costs beyond a time frame of 2 years. As at October 2006, 9% of the companies were in the process of mine construction, whereas 6% had made it to producer status. The lead time from listing to production ranged from 1.5 to 53 months, giving a median of 28 months.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.08.001</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4207 |
ispartof | Resources policy, 2007-12, Vol.32 (4), p.159-182 |
issn | 0301-4207 1873-7641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36814263 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Australia Australian Securities exchange Australian securities exchange (ASX) Capital formation Capital structure Financial performance Financial research Initial public offering Initial public offering (IPO) Junior mineral exploration company Stock exchange Stock prices Strategic planning Strategy |
title | Australian junior exploration floats, 2001–06, and their implications for IPOs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Australian%20junior%20exploration%20floats,%202001%E2%80%9306,%20and%20their%20implications%20for%20IPOs&rft.jtitle=Resources%20policy&rft.au=Kreuzer,%20Oliver%20P.&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=159-182&rft.issn=0301-4207&rft.eissn=1873-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31891397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31891397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301420707000530&rfr_iscdi=true |