Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack
The vast majority of economic research on environmental regulation in open economies focuses on producer generated—“smokestack”—pollution; we instead consider consumer generated—“tailpipe”—pollution. We examine how political opposition to environmental regulation varies with a country's trade r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental economics and management 2008, Vol.55 (1), p.52-71 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Journal of environmental economics and management |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | McAusland, Carol |
description | The vast majority of economic research on environmental regulation in open economies focuses on producer generated—“smokestack”—pollution; we instead consider consumer generated—“tailpipe”—pollution. We examine how political opposition to environmental regulation varies with a country's trade regime, and show that the impact on environmental policy of a move from autarky to free trade can depend critically on who ultimately generates pollution, producers or consumers. We find that opening to trade may raise industry opposition to smokestack regulation, but reduce its opposition to strict tailpipe policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36814062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0095069607000940</els_id><sourcerecordid>31647679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-95fc435443e4860b7cf452e8fce11b729bb9d64fa48e85aa28cbbf99aaf0ebee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUha0KpA6FP8AqYsGqCdeOnwgWVdUHUiU2w9pynBvVaV7YmZH67-toEAsWdHF8F_7OubYOIR8pVBSo_NJXPeJYMQBVga4A2BnZUTCyBM7NG7IDMKIEaeQ5eZdSDwAalNyR7_voWrwslnkIa_DpsnBTW6yPWOB0DHGeRpzWr8XehWEJCxbHVBVpnJ8wrc4_vSdvOzck_PBnXpBftzf76_vy4efdj-urh9ILQ9fSiM7zWnBeI9cSGuU7LhjqziOljWKmaUwreee4Ri2cY9o3TWeMcx1gg1hfkM-n3CXOvw95tx1D8jgMbsL5kGwtNeUg2esglVxJZV4FqZFKi3oDP_0D9vMhTvm3llFRK13DBrET5OOcUsTOLjGMLj5bCnYryPZ2K8huBVnQNheUTfcnU8QF_V8HIm6om-zR1k6IfDxnZafOI2TRrGW7Y1ZR-7iOOerbKQpzCceA0SYfcPLYhoh-te0c_veSF2BwsQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215378309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McAusland, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>McAusland, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>The vast majority of economic research on environmental regulation in open economies focuses on producer generated—“smokestack”—pollution; we instead consider consumer generated—“tailpipe”—pollution. We examine how political opposition to environmental regulation varies with a country's trade regime, and show that the impact on environmental policy of a move from autarky to free trade can depend critically on who ultimately generates pollution, producers or consumers. We find that opening to trade may raise industry opposition to smokestack regulation, but reduce its opposition to strict tailpipe policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-0696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEMDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Environment ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental economics ; Environmental policy ; Environmental regulations ; Foreign trade ; Free trade ; Industrial pollution ; International political economy ; Political economy ; Politics ; Pollution ; Studies ; Trade ; Trade policy</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental economics and management, 2008, Vol.55 (1), p.52-71</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-95fc435443e4860b7cf452e8fce11b729bb9d64fa48e85aa28cbbf99aaf0ebee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-95fc435443e4860b7cf452e8fce11b729bb9d64fa48e85aa28cbbf99aaf0ebee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069607000940$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejeeman/v_3a55_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a52-71.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAusland, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack</title><title>Journal of environmental economics and management</title><description>The vast majority of economic research on environmental regulation in open economies focuses on producer generated—“smokestack”—pollution; we instead consider consumer generated—“tailpipe”—pollution. We examine how political opposition to environmental regulation varies with a country's trade regime, and show that the impact on environmental policy of a move from autarky to free trade can depend critically on who ultimately generates pollution, producers or consumers. We find that opening to trade may raise industry opposition to smokestack regulation, but reduce its opposition to strict tailpipe policy.</description><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Foreign trade</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>Industrial pollution</subject><subject>International political economy</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><issn>0095-0696</issn><issn>1096-0449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUha0KpA6FP8AqYsGqCdeOnwgWVdUHUiU2w9pynBvVaV7YmZH67-toEAsWdHF8F_7OubYOIR8pVBSo_NJXPeJYMQBVga4A2BnZUTCyBM7NG7IDMKIEaeQ5eZdSDwAalNyR7_voWrwslnkIa_DpsnBTW6yPWOB0DHGeRpzWr8XehWEJCxbHVBVpnJ8wrc4_vSdvOzck_PBnXpBftzf76_vy4efdj-urh9ILQ9fSiM7zWnBeI9cSGuU7LhjqziOljWKmaUwreee4Ri2cY9o3TWeMcx1gg1hfkM-n3CXOvw95tx1D8jgMbsL5kGwtNeUg2esglVxJZV4FqZFKi3oDP_0D9vMhTvm3llFRK13DBrET5OOcUsTOLjGMLj5bCnYryPZ2K8huBVnQNheUTfcnU8QF_V8HIm6om-zR1k6IfDxnZafOI2TRrGW7Y1ZR-7iOOerbKQpzCceA0SYfcPLYhoh-te0c_veSF2BwsQ4</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>McAusland, Carol</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack</title><author>McAusland, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-95fc435443e4860b7cf452e8fce11b729bb9d64fa48e85aa28cbbf99aaf0ebee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Foreign trade</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>Industrial pollution</topic><topic>International political economy</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAusland, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAusland, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>52-71</pages><issn>0095-0696</issn><eissn>1096-0449</eissn><coden>JEEMDI</coden><abstract>The vast majority of economic research on environmental regulation in open economies focuses on producer generated—“smokestack”—pollution; we instead consider consumer generated—“tailpipe”—pollution. We examine how political opposition to environmental regulation varies with a country's trade regime, and show that the impact on environmental policy of a move from autarky to free trade can depend critically on who ultimately generates pollution, producers or consumers. We find that opening to trade may raise industry opposition to smokestack regulation, but reduce its opposition to strict tailpipe policy.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.002</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-0696 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental economics and management, 2008, Vol.55 (1), p.52-71 |
issn | 0095-0696 1096-0449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36814062 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Environment Environmental degradation Environmental economics Environmental policy Environmental regulations Foreign trade Free trade Industrial pollution International political economy Political economy Politics Pollution Studies Trade Trade policy |
title | Trade, politics, and the environment: Tailpipe vs. smokestack |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A22%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade,%20politics,%20and%20the%20environment:%20Tailpipe%20vs.%20smokestack&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20economics%20and%20management&rft.au=McAusland,%20Carol&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=52-71&rft.issn=0095-0696&rft.eissn=1096-0449&rft.coden=JEEMDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31647679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215378309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0095069607000940&rfr_iscdi=true |