Student conceptions of oral presentations
A phenomenographic study of students' experience of oral presentations in an open learning theology programme constituted three contrasting conceptions of oral presentations-as transmission of ideas; as a test of students' understanding of what they were studying; and as a position to be a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.323-336 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 336 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 323 |
| container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Joughin, Gordon |
| description | A phenomenographic study of students' experience of oral presentations in an open learning theology programme constituted three contrasting conceptions of oral presentations-as transmission of ideas; as a test of students' understanding of what they were studying; and as a position to be argued. Each of these conceptions represented a combination of related aspects of students' experience, namely, their awareness of the audience and their interaction with that audience, how they perceived the nature of theology, affective factors, and how they compared the oral presentation format with that of written assignments. The conception of the presentation as a position to be argued was associated with a particularly powerful student learning experience, with students describing the oral presentation as being more demanding than the written assignments, more personal, requiring deeper understanding, and leading to better learning. The study draws our attention to the various ways in which students may perceive a single form of academic task and their need to develop their understanding of assessment formats. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075070701346873 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36812478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ766268</ericid><sourcerecordid>1326546871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8ea5c14ead60cb441be04cc5067fa56ef009a9671d26376b741f970db29ea463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AMFD8SB4qE7aNGnAiyzrPxY8uAdvIU0T6NJtapKi--3NWvHgIjKHgXm_N28YhE4xXGEo4RpyYAWwWDgntGT5HppgwiDFjLzuo8lWTyPAD9GR9ysAoKwkE3T5EoZadyFRtlO6D43tfGJNYp1sk95pHzX5NT1GB0a2Xp989yla3s2Xs4d08Xz_OLtdpIpkRUhLLQuFiZY1BVURgisNRKki5hlZUG0AuOSU4TqjOaMVI9hwBnWVcS0JzafoYlzbO_s2aB_EuvFKt63stB28yGmJM8LKCJ7_Ald2cF08TWSYFxnnZRYhPELKWe-dNqJ3zVq6jcAgto8TO4-LnrPRo12jfvj5E6M0o9tcNspNZ6xby3fr2loEuWmtM052qvG7S0X4CNF5868z__uuT77ZjW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219529982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student conceptions of oral presentations</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Joughin, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>A phenomenographic study of students' experience of oral presentations in an open learning theology programme constituted three contrasting conceptions of oral presentations-as transmission of ideas; as a test of students' understanding of what they were studying; and as a position to be argued. Each of these conceptions represented a combination of related aspects of students' experience, namely, their awareness of the audience and their interaction with that audience, how they perceived the nature of theology, affective factors, and how they compared the oral presentation format with that of written assignments. The conception of the presentation as a position to be argued was associated with a particularly powerful student learning experience, with students describing the oral presentation as being more demanding than the written assignments, more personal, requiring deeper understanding, and leading to better learning. The study draws our attention to the various ways in which students may perceive a single form of academic task and their need to develop their understanding of assessment formats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075070701346873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Australia ; Cluster Grouping ; College students ; Comparative Analysis ; Comprehension ; Courses ; Education systems ; Evaluation ; Interviews ; Learning ; Learning Experience ; Open Education ; Oral presentation ; Perceptions ; Persuasive Discourse ; Philosophy ; Problem solving ; Religious education ; Speeches ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; Theology ; Writing Assignments</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.323-336</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society for Research into Higher Education 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8ea5c14ead60cb441be04cc5067fa56ef009a9671d26376b741f970db29ea463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8ea5c14ead60cb441be04cc5067fa56ef009a9671d26376b741f970db29ea463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ766268$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Student conceptions of oral presentations</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>A phenomenographic study of students' experience of oral presentations in an open learning theology programme constituted three contrasting conceptions of oral presentations-as transmission of ideas; as a test of students' understanding of what they were studying; and as a position to be argued. Each of these conceptions represented a combination of related aspects of students' experience, namely, their awareness of the audience and their interaction with that audience, how they perceived the nature of theology, affective factors, and how they compared the oral presentation format with that of written assignments. The conception of the presentation as a position to be argued was associated with a particularly powerful student learning experience, with students describing the oral presentation as being more demanding than the written assignments, more personal, requiring deeper understanding, and leading to better learning. The study draws our attention to the various ways in which students may perceive a single form of academic task and their need to develop their understanding of assessment formats.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cluster Grouping</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Courses</subject><subject>Education systems</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Experience</subject><subject>Open Education</subject><subject>Oral presentation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Religious education</subject><subject>Speeches</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AMFD8SB4qE7aNGnAiyzrPxY8uAdvIU0T6NJtapKi--3NWvHgIjKHgXm_N28YhE4xXGEo4RpyYAWwWDgntGT5HppgwiDFjLzuo8lWTyPAD9GR9ysAoKwkE3T5EoZadyFRtlO6D43tfGJNYp1sk95pHzX5NT1GB0a2Xp989yla3s2Xs4d08Xz_OLtdpIpkRUhLLQuFiZY1BVURgisNRKki5hlZUG0AuOSU4TqjOaMVI9hwBnWVcS0JzafoYlzbO_s2aB_EuvFKt63stB28yGmJM8LKCJ7_Ald2cF08TWSYFxnnZRYhPELKWe-dNqJ3zVq6jcAgto8TO4-LnrPRo12jfvj5E6M0o9tcNspNZ6xby3fr2loEuWmtM052qvG7S0X4CNF5868z__uuT77ZjW0</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Joughin, Gordon</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Student conceptions of oral presentations</title><author>Joughin, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8ea5c14ead60cb441be04cc5067fa56ef009a9671d26376b741f970db29ea463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cluster Grouping</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Courses</topic><topic>Education systems</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Experience</topic><topic>Open Education</topic><topic>Oral presentation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Religious education</topic><topic>Speeches</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joughin, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ766268</ericid><atitle>Student conceptions of oral presentations</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>323-336</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>A phenomenographic study of students' experience of oral presentations in an open learning theology programme constituted three contrasting conceptions of oral presentations-as transmission of ideas; as a test of students' understanding of what they were studying; and as a position to be argued. Each of these conceptions represented a combination of related aspects of students' experience, namely, their awareness of the audience and their interaction with that audience, how they perceived the nature of theology, affective factors, and how they compared the oral presentation format with that of written assignments. The conception of the presentation as a position to be argued was associated with a particularly powerful student learning experience, with students describing the oral presentation as being more demanding than the written assignments, more personal, requiring deeper understanding, and leading to better learning. The study draws our attention to the various ways in which students may perceive a single form of academic task and their need to develop their understanding of assessment formats.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075070701346873</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
| ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.323-336 |
| issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36812478 |
| source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Audiences Australia Cluster Grouping College students Comparative Analysis Comprehension Courses Education systems Evaluation Interviews Learning Learning Experience Open Education Oral presentation Perceptions Persuasive Discourse Philosophy Problem solving Religious education Speeches Student Evaluation Students Theology Writing Assignments |
| title | Student conceptions of oral presentations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20conceptions%20of%20oral%20presentations&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Joughin,%20Gordon&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=323-336&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075070701346873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1326546871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219529982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ766268&rfr_iscdi=true |