Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops
The possibility of increased production of genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture accentuates the need to examine the feasibility of GM and non-GM technologies co-existing on a common physical landscape. Using the theory of clubs, this paper examines the possibility of co-existence for GM an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of agricultural economics 2007-06, Vol.55 (2), p.185-195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 195 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Canadian journal of agricultural economics |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Furtan, W.H Güzel, A Weseen, A.S |
description | The possibility of increased production of genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture accentuates the need to examine the feasibility of GM and non-GM technologies co-existing on a common physical landscape. Using the theory of clubs, this paper examines the possibility of co-existence for GM and organic wheat technologies through the formation of an organic club with an endogenously determined buffer zone. Given the available data on prices, and yields, it is shown that a club can be created in which GM and organic agricultural production technologies can economically co-exist in the same physical landscape. Specifically, co-existence results in an increase in economic welfare over a situation where only GM technology is used but is not Pareto superior because producers in the buffer zone will incur injury. We show that organic producers in the club can compensate producers in the buffer zone and still be better off. Hence, the compensation principle holds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00087.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36804635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36804635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5267-12a2204b4ca308725bd2ffa27923a454e84dc06d3a1c19a8be481bbd1561907a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EEkPhN2CxYJfgtx0kFlWggWqYIkrF8spxnCpDGk_tGTHz73EI6oINeOPXOVf2_RDClJQ0jzfbkmohCl1pVTJCdEkIMbo8PkKrh4vHaDWfFjyvn6JnKW3zVioiVqhZ26lLzu48rsdDm97iOhT-OKS9n5zHoceNn_x-cHYcT_hz6IZ-8B3OEr6Kt3YaHK5j2KXn6Elvx-Rf_JnP0M3Fh2_1x2J91Xyqz9eFk0zpgjLLGBGtcJbnZzLZdqzvLdMV41ZI4Y3oHFEdt9TRyprWC0PbtqNS0Ypoy8_Q66XuLob7g097uBuS8-NoJx8OCbgyRCgu_wnSSnLCDcngq7_AbTjEKX8CGJGGKUNphswCuRhSir6HXRzubDwBJTDnAFuY2w1zu2HOAX7nAMesvlvUn8PoT__tQX153uRV9ovFnzM5Pvg2_gCluZbwfdPAZnP9_uLr5ReoM_9y4XsbwN7GIcHNNSOU5-JaKMn5LwmmpHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205826811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Furtan, W.H ; Güzel, A ; Weseen, A.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Furtan, W.H ; Güzel, A ; Weseen, A.S</creatorcontrib><description>The possibility of increased production of genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture accentuates the need to examine the feasibility of GM and non-GM technologies co-existing on a common physical landscape. Using the theory of clubs, this paper examines the possibility of co-existence for GM and organic wheat technologies through the formation of an organic club with an endogenously determined buffer zone. Given the available data on prices, and yields, it is shown that a club can be created in which GM and organic agricultural production technologies can economically co-exist in the same physical landscape. Specifically, co-existence results in an increase in economic welfare over a situation where only GM technology is used but is not Pareto superior because producers in the buffer zone will incur injury. We show that organic producers in the club can compensate producers in the buffer zone and still be better off. Hence, the compensation principle holds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-3976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00087.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural technology ; Borders ; Clubs ; Crops ; Genetically altered foods ; Genetically modified organisms ; Landscape ; Natural & organic foods ; Organic farming ; Pareto efficiency ; Spatial analysis ; Studies ; Triticum aestivum</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of agricultural economics, 2007-06, Vol.55 (2), p.185-195</ispartof><rights>Copyright Agricultural Institute of Canada Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5267-12a2204b4ca308725bd2ffa27923a454e84dc06d3a1c19a8be481bbd1561907a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5267-12a2204b4ca308725bd2ffa27923a454e84dc06d3a1c19a8be481bbd1561907a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-7976.2007.00087.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-7976.2007.00087.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furtan, W.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güzel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weseen, A.S</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops</title><title>Canadian journal of agricultural economics</title><description>The possibility of increased production of genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture accentuates the need to examine the feasibility of GM and non-GM technologies co-existing on a common physical landscape. Using the theory of clubs, this paper examines the possibility of co-existence for GM and organic wheat technologies through the formation of an organic club with an endogenously determined buffer zone. Given the available data on prices, and yields, it is shown that a club can be created in which GM and organic agricultural production technologies can economically co-exist in the same physical landscape. Specifically, co-existence results in an increase in economic welfare over a situation where only GM technology is used but is not Pareto superior because producers in the buffer zone will incur injury. We show that organic producers in the club can compensate producers in the buffer zone and still be better off. Hence, the compensation principle holds.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Clubs</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Natural & organic foods</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Pareto efficiency</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><issn>0008-3976</issn><issn>1744-7976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EEkPhN2CxYJfgtx0kFlWggWqYIkrF8spxnCpDGk_tGTHz73EI6oINeOPXOVf2_RDClJQ0jzfbkmohCl1pVTJCdEkIMbo8PkKrh4vHaDWfFjyvn6JnKW3zVioiVqhZ26lLzu48rsdDm97iOhT-OKS9n5zHoceNn_x-cHYcT_hz6IZ-8B3OEr6Kt3YaHK5j2KXn6Elvx-Rf_JnP0M3Fh2_1x2J91Xyqz9eFk0zpgjLLGBGtcJbnZzLZdqzvLdMV41ZI4Y3oHFEdt9TRyprWC0PbtqNS0Ypoy8_Q66XuLob7g097uBuS8-NoJx8OCbgyRCgu_wnSSnLCDcngq7_AbTjEKX8CGJGGKUNphswCuRhSir6HXRzubDwBJTDnAFuY2w1zu2HOAX7nAMesvlvUn8PoT__tQX153uRV9ovFnzM5Pvg2_gCluZbwfdPAZnP9_uLr5ReoM_9y4XsbwN7GIcHNNSOU5-JaKMn5LwmmpHc</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Furtan, W.H</creator><creator>Güzel, A</creator><creator>Weseen, A.S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Agricultural Institute of Canada</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops</title><author>Furtan, W.H ; Güzel, A ; Weseen, A.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5267-12a2204b4ca308725bd2ffa27923a454e84dc06d3a1c19a8be481bbd1561907a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Clubs</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Natural & organic foods</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Pareto efficiency</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furtan, W.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güzel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weseen, A.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furtan, W.H</au><au>Güzel, A</au><au>Weseen, A.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>185-195</pages><issn>0008-3976</issn><eissn>1744-7976</eissn><abstract>The possibility of increased production of genetically modified (GM) crops in agriculture accentuates the need to examine the feasibility of GM and non-GM technologies co-existing on a common physical landscape. Using the theory of clubs, this paper examines the possibility of co-existence for GM and organic wheat technologies through the formation of an organic club with an endogenously determined buffer zone. Given the available data on prices, and yields, it is shown that a club can be created in which GM and organic agricultural production technologies can economically co-exist in the same physical landscape. Specifically, co-existence results in an increase in economic welfare over a situation where only GM technology is used but is not Pareto superior because producers in the buffer zone will incur injury. We show that organic producers in the club can compensate producers in the buffer zone and still be better off. Hence, the compensation principle holds.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00087.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-3976 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of agricultural economics, 2007-06, Vol.55 (2), p.185-195 |
issn | 0008-3976 1744-7976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36804635 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural production Agricultural technology Borders Clubs Crops Genetically altered foods Genetically modified organisms Landscape Natural & organic foods Organic farming Pareto efficiency Spatial analysis Studies Triticum aestivum |
title | Landscape Clubs: Co-existence of Genetically Modified and Organic Crops |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T12%3A35%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%20Clubs:%20Co-existence%20of%20Genetically%20Modified%20and%20Organic%20Crops&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Furtan,%20W.H&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=185-195&rft.issn=0008-3976&rft.eissn=1744-7976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00087.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36804635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205826811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |