Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam
We examine the effect of giving respondents time to think about their stated choices (SC) in a survey of cholera and typhoid vaccine preferences in Hue, Vietnam. Because neither vaccine is widely available in Vietnam, we used the SC approach (a stated preference technique) and gave half of our respo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Economic inquiry 2007-01, Vol.45 (1), p.100-114 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 114 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 100 |
| container_title | Economic inquiry |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Cook, Joseph Whittington, Dale Canh, Do Gia Johnson, F Reed Nyamete, Andrew |
| description | We examine the effect of giving respondents time to think about their stated choices (SC) in a survey of cholera and typhoid vaccine preferences in Hue, Vietnam. Because neither vaccine is widely available in Vietnam, we used the SC approach (a stated preference technique) and gave half of our respondents overnight to think about their choices to make the hypothetical valuation scenario as similar to a real-life choice situation as possible. Respondents who were given extra time made fewer choices that violated internal validity tests of utility theory, and had lower average willingness to pay (WTP), confirming a result found in similar studies in the contingent valuation literature. Reprinted by permission of Wiley-Blackwell |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ei/cb1005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36707209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36707209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_367072093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzz2OwjAQQGEXrAQsFNxgKipYJkTmp0YgaoRokXEmyoBjB3sC4vZQcICtXvM1T6lRhn8ZrvMZ8cxeMkTdUT3EtZ7O9Srvqn5KV0TMF1r3FB3IsbmwY3lBKCGJESqgiVRSJG8pQRki2Co4igaML0BeTRW4gIexlv0HPFkqEK4JJIBU7G_AHvYtTeDEJN7UA_VTGpdo-O2vGu-2x81-2sRwbynJueZkyTnjKbTpnC-WuJx_Hv4N36B1TV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36707209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cook, Joseph ; Whittington, Dale ; Canh, Do Gia ; Johnson, F Reed ; Nyamete, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Cook, Joseph ; Whittington, Dale ; Canh, Do Gia ; Johnson, F Reed ; Nyamete, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the effect of giving respondents time to think about their stated choices (SC) in a survey of cholera and typhoid vaccine preferences in Hue, Vietnam. Because neither vaccine is widely available in Vietnam, we used the SC approach (a stated preference technique) and gave half of our respondents overnight to think about their choices to make the hypothetical valuation scenario as similar to a real-life choice situation as possible. Respondents who were given extra time made fewer choices that violated internal validity tests of utility theory, and had lower average willingness to pay (WTP), confirming a result found in similar studies in the contingent valuation literature. Reprinted by permission of Wiley-Blackwell</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-2583</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ei/cb1005</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cholera ; Diseases ; Empirical research ; Health economics ; Immunization ; Preferences ; Survey analysis ; Survey data ; Time ; Typhoid ; Vietnam</subject><ispartof>Economic inquiry, 2007-01, Vol.45 (1), p.100-114</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cook, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canh, Do Gia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, F Reed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyamete, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam</title><title>Economic inquiry</title><description>We examine the effect of giving respondents time to think about their stated choices (SC) in a survey of cholera and typhoid vaccine preferences in Hue, Vietnam. Because neither vaccine is widely available in Vietnam, we used the SC approach (a stated preference technique) and gave half of our respondents overnight to think about their choices to make the hypothetical valuation scenario as similar to a real-life choice situation as possible. Respondents who were given extra time made fewer choices that violated internal validity tests of utility theory, and had lower average willingness to pay (WTP), confirming a result found in similar studies in the contingent valuation literature. Reprinted by permission of Wiley-Blackwell</description><subject>Cholera</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Survey analysis</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Typhoid</subject><subject>Vietnam</subject><issn>0095-2583</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzz2OwjAQQGEXrAQsFNxgKipYJkTmp0YgaoRokXEmyoBjB3sC4vZQcICtXvM1T6lRhn8ZrvMZ8cxeMkTdUT3EtZ7O9Srvqn5KV0TMF1r3FB3IsbmwY3lBKCGJESqgiVRSJG8pQRki2Co4igaML0BeTRW4gIexlv0HPFkqEK4JJIBU7G_AHvYtTeDEJN7UA_VTGpdo-O2vGu-2x81-2sRwbynJueZkyTnjKbTpnC-WuJx_Hv4N36B1TV8</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Cook, Joseph</creator><creator>Whittington, Dale</creator><creator>Canh, Do Gia</creator><creator>Johnson, F Reed</creator><creator>Nyamete, Andrew</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam</title><author>Cook, Joseph ; Whittington, Dale ; Canh, Do Gia ; Johnson, F Reed ; Nyamete, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_367072093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Cholera</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Survey analysis</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Typhoid</topic><topic>Vietnam</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cook, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canh, Do Gia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, F Reed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyamete, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cook, Joseph</au><au>Whittington, Dale</au><au>Canh, Do Gia</au><au>Johnson, F Reed</au><au>Nyamete, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam</atitle><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>100-114</pages><issn>0095-2583</issn><abstract>We examine the effect of giving respondents time to think about their stated choices (SC) in a survey of cholera and typhoid vaccine preferences in Hue, Vietnam. Because neither vaccine is widely available in Vietnam, we used the SC approach (a stated preference technique) and gave half of our respondents overnight to think about their choices to make the hypothetical valuation scenario as similar to a real-life choice situation as possible. Respondents who were given extra time made fewer choices that violated internal validity tests of utility theory, and had lower average willingness to pay (WTP), confirming a result found in similar studies in the contingent valuation literature. Reprinted by permission of Wiley-Blackwell</abstract><doi>10.1093/ei/cb1005</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0095-2583 |
| ispartof | Economic inquiry, 2007-01, Vol.45 (1), p.100-114 |
| issn | 0095-2583 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36707209 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Cholera Diseases Empirical research Health economics Immunization Preferences Survey analysis Survey data Time Typhoid Vietnam |
| title | Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A10%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20stated%20preferences%20for%20cholera%20and%20typhoid%20vaccines%20with%20time%20to%20think%20in%20Hue,%20Vietnam&rft.jtitle=Economic%20inquiry&rft.au=Cook,%20Joseph&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=100-114&rft.issn=0095-2583&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ei/cb1005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E36707209%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36707209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |