The Living Constitution
An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living C...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard law review 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1812 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1737 |
container_title | Harvard law review |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Ackerman, Bruce |
description | An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36685411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40042636</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40042636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j150t-c81ff9fa0551714ec45c5fa5c8760995616f0f31fc66dba73a1ac88c6e53dbd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzjFLxDAYxvEgCtbT2Uk4HNwK79skb9NRinpCweWE20ouTTSl15xNKvjtLZyT07P8ePifsaxAwrwqaXfOMgAsc4W4u2RXMfYAQLwUGbvdftp147_9-LGuwxiTT3PyYbxmF04P0d787Yq9Pz9t603evL281o9N3qOElBuFzlVOg5RYorBGSCOdlkaVBFUlCcmB4-gMUbfXJdeojVKGrOTdvlN8xR5Ov8cpfM02pvbgo7HDoEcb5thyIiUF4gLv_8E-zNO4tLUFKiURQSzo7oT6mMLUHid_0NNPKwBEQZz4L-y3Th0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218851104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Living Constitution</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ackerman, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-811X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-976X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HALRAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Association</publisher><subject>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures ; Civil rights ; Civil rights movements ; Constitution ; Constitutional amendments ; Constitutional law ; Government ; Historical analysis ; Landmarks ; Law ; Nation ; New Deal ; Political campaigns ; Political debate ; Political parties ; Politicians ; Separation of powers ; Statutory law ; Studies ; U.S.A ; United States history ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Harvard law review, 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Harvard Law Review Association</rights><rights>Copyright Harvard Law Review Association May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40042636$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40042636$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1750,27866,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>The Living Constitution</title><title>Harvard law review</title><description>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</description><subject>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights movements</subject><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Constitutional amendments</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Landmarks</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Nation</subject><subject>New Deal</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Separation of powers</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States history</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0017-811X</issn><issn>2161-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzjFLxDAYxvEgCtbT2Uk4HNwK79skb9NRinpCweWE20ouTTSl15xNKvjtLZyT07P8ePifsaxAwrwqaXfOMgAsc4W4u2RXMfYAQLwUGbvdftp147_9-LGuwxiTT3PyYbxmF04P0d787Yq9Pz9t603evL281o9N3qOElBuFzlVOg5RYorBGSCOdlkaVBFUlCcmB4-gMUbfXJdeojVKGrOTdvlN8xR5Ov8cpfM02pvbgo7HDoEcb5thyIiUF4gLv_8E-zNO4tLUFKiURQSzo7oT6mMLUHid_0NNPKwBEQZz4L-y3Th0</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Ackerman, Bruce</creator><general>Harvard Law Review Association</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>The Living Constitution</title><author>Ackerman, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j150t-c81ff9fa0551714ec45c5fa5c8760995616f0f31fc66dba73a1ac88c6e53dbd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights movements</topic><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Constitutional amendments</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Landmarks</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Nation</topic><topic>New Deal</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Separation of powers</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States history</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerman, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Living Constitution</atitle><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1737</spage><epage>1812</epage><pages>1737-1812</pages><issn>0017-811X</issn><eissn>2161-976X</eissn><coden>HALRAF</coden><abstract>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Law Review Association</pub><tpages>76</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-811X |
ispartof | Harvard law review, 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812 |
issn | 0017-811X 2161-976X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36685411 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | 2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures Civil rights Civil rights movements Constitution Constitutional amendments Constitutional law Government Historical analysis Landmarks Law Nation New Deal Political campaigns Political debate Political parties Politicians Separation of powers Statutory law Studies U.S.A United States history Voting rights |
title | The Living Constitution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Living%20Constitution&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20law%20review&rft.au=Ackerman,%20Bruce&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1737&rft.epage=1812&rft.pages=1737-1812&rft.issn=0017-811X&rft.eissn=2161-976X&rft.coden=HALRAF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40042636%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218851104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40042636&rfr_iscdi=true |