The Living Constitution

An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harvard law review 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812
1. Verfasser: Ackerman, Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1812
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1737
container_title Harvard law review
container_volume 120
creator Ackerman, Bruce
description An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36685411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40042636</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40042636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j150t-c81ff9fa0551714ec45c5fa5c8760995616f0f31fc66dba73a1ac88c6e53dbd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzjFLxDAYxvEgCtbT2Uk4HNwK79skb9NRinpCweWE20ouTTSl15xNKvjtLZyT07P8ePifsaxAwrwqaXfOMgAsc4W4u2RXMfYAQLwUGbvdftp147_9-LGuwxiTT3PyYbxmF04P0d787Yq9Pz9t603evL281o9N3qOElBuFzlVOg5RYorBGSCOdlkaVBFUlCcmB4-gMUbfXJdeojVKGrOTdvlN8xR5Ov8cpfM02pvbgo7HDoEcb5thyIiUF4gLv_8E-zNO4tLUFKiURQSzo7oT6mMLUHid_0NNPKwBEQZz4L-y3Th0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218851104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Living Constitution</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ackerman, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-811X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-976X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HALRAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Association</publisher><subject>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures ; Civil rights ; Civil rights movements ; Constitution ; Constitutional amendments ; Constitutional law ; Government ; Historical analysis ; Landmarks ; Law ; Nation ; New Deal ; Political campaigns ; Political debate ; Political parties ; Politicians ; Separation of powers ; Statutory law ; Studies ; U.S.A ; United States history ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Harvard law review, 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Harvard Law Review Association</rights><rights>Copyright Harvard Law Review Association May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40042636$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40042636$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1750,27866,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>The Living Constitution</title><title>Harvard law review</title><description>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</description><subject>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Civil rights movements</subject><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Constitutional amendments</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Landmarks</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Nation</subject><subject>New Deal</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Separation of powers</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States history</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0017-811X</issn><issn>2161-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzjFLxDAYxvEgCtbT2Uk4HNwK79skb9NRinpCweWE20ouTTSl15xNKvjtLZyT07P8ePifsaxAwrwqaXfOMgAsc4W4u2RXMfYAQLwUGbvdftp147_9-LGuwxiTT3PyYbxmF04P0d787Yq9Pz9t603evL281o9N3qOElBuFzlVOg5RYorBGSCOdlkaVBFUlCcmB4-gMUbfXJdeojVKGrOTdvlN8xR5Ov8cpfM02pvbgo7HDoEcb5thyIiUF4gLv_8E-zNO4tLUFKiURQSzo7oT6mMLUHid_0NNPKwBEQZz4L-y3Th0</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Ackerman, Bruce</creator><general>Harvard Law Review Association</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>The Living Constitution</title><author>Ackerman, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j150t-c81ff9fa0551714ec45c5fa5c8760995616f0f31fc66dba73a1ac88c6e53dbd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Civil rights movements</topic><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Constitutional amendments</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Landmarks</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Nation</topic><topic>New Deal</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Separation of powers</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States history</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerman, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Living Constitution</atitle><jtitle>Harvard law review</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1737</spage><epage>1812</epage><pages>1737-1812</pages><issn>0017-811X</issn><eissn>2161-976X</eissn><coden>HALRAF</coden><abstract>An appreciation of the organic path of historical development is absolutely essential to an adequate understanding of the American Constitution as it moves forward into its third century. This paper emphasizes the enduring significance of Founding machinery in shaping the development of the Living Constitution. Pride of place goes to the separation of powers, and especially to the Founding decision to stagger terms in office - two for the House, four for the President, six for the Senate and life for the Supreme Court. This makes it almost impossible for a movement-party to gain control over all the levers of power at a single moment, and imposes a more deliberate pace on constitutional revision. This dynamic systems of checks and balances places the burden of persuasion on the partisans of the new constitutional vision; they must keep winning elections long enough to gain control of all three branches in order to achieve a constitutional breakthrough in the form of landmark statutes and superprecedents. The paper predicts that the separation of powers will be the central mechanism for constitutional transformation in the coming century.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Law Review Association</pub><tpages>76</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-811X
ispartof Harvard law review, 2007-05, Vol.120 (7), p.1737-1812
issn 0017-811X
2161-976X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36685411
source PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects 2006 Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures
Civil rights
Civil rights movements
Constitution
Constitutional amendments
Constitutional law
Government
Historical analysis
Landmarks
Law
Nation
New Deal
Political campaigns
Political debate
Political parties
Politicians
Separation of powers
Statutory law
Studies
U.S.A
United States history
Voting rights
title The Living Constitution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Living%20Constitution&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20law%20review&rft.au=Ackerman,%20Bruce&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1737&rft.epage=1812&rft.pages=1737-1812&rft.issn=0017-811X&rft.eissn=2161-976X&rft.coden=HALRAF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40042636%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218851104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40042636&rfr_iscdi=true