Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach
The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a funct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2610 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2590 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | de Vries, Bert J.M. van Vuuren, Detlef P. Hoogwijk, Monique M. |
description | The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300
EJ
year
−1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10
¢
kWh
−1 of 200–300
PWh
year
−1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10
¢
kWh
−1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36565963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421506003326</els_id><sourcerecordid>1186100391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQbUTBcfULvARBbz1Wkk66s-BhWXRXGBBkPYdMunomQ093m2RmmaN_bvXOquBBA5UqwntVr_KK4jWHJQeu3--WOExjvxQAeglmCSCeFAve1LLUdV0_LRYggZeV4Op58SKlHQBUjakWxY-vOOC9W_fIqIibE0vjIXpMl-xuiyGyTT-uXc-mMeOQA1XdGFneIutCTLncur5jY_fwInjKzBPsEE_MZeZ-kXs8Yn_JrgYWhoyb6DK2zE1THJ3fviyeda5P-OoxXxTfPn28u74tV19uPl9frUqvK8hlpRXodeuRNw1JB6x5baq1NOu26UByUclWoPdKNygbj7UURjfSoVBSe4_yonh37ktjvx8wZbsPyWPfuwHHQ7JSK62Mlv8F8qoBoTgn4Ju_gDv6u4GWsAIUza94TSB5Bvk4phSxs1MMexdPloOdzbM7-2Cenc2zYCyZR6zVmRVxQv-bgnQGnMFHK51UdJ0oiFlTChQVxTQ_KQNWaJqxzXtq9_ZRqUueHItu8CH9UdIoYwzMq38445CMOAaMNvmAg8c2RPTZtmP4p-yfpjjJ0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205329417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><description>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300
EJ
year
−1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10
¢
kWh
−1 of 200–300
PWh
year
−1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10
¢
kWh
−1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Applied sciences ; Climate change ; Economic analysis ; Economic data ; Economic potential ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy industry ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Market potential ; Natural energy ; Production costs ; Renewable energy ; Renewable energy sources ; Scenario analysis ; Studies ; Techno-economic potential ; Technological change ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18599903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a35_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a2590-2610.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300
EJ
year
−1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10
¢
kWh
−1 of 200–300
PWh
year
−1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10
¢
kWh
−1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Economic potential</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Market potential</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Scenario analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Techno-economic potential</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQbUTBcfULvARBbz1Wkk66s-BhWXRXGBBkPYdMunomQ093m2RmmaN_bvXOquBBA5UqwntVr_KK4jWHJQeu3--WOExjvxQAeglmCSCeFAve1LLUdV0_LRYggZeV4Op58SKlHQBUjakWxY-vOOC9W_fIqIibE0vjIXpMl-xuiyGyTT-uXc-mMeOQA1XdGFneIutCTLncur5jY_fwInjKzBPsEE_MZeZ-kXs8Yn_JrgYWhoyb6DK2zE1THJ3fviyeda5P-OoxXxTfPn28u74tV19uPl9frUqvK8hlpRXodeuRNw1JB6x5baq1NOu26UByUclWoPdKNygbj7UURjfSoVBSe4_yonh37ktjvx8wZbsPyWPfuwHHQ7JSK62Mlv8F8qoBoTgn4Ju_gDv6u4GWsAIUza94TSB5Bvk4phSxs1MMexdPloOdzbM7-2Cenc2zYCyZR6zVmRVxQv-bgnQGnMFHK51UdJ0oiFlTChQVxTQ_KQNWaJqxzXtq9_ZRqUueHItu8CH9UdIoYwzMq38445CMOAaMNvmAg8c2RPTZtmP4p-yfpjjJ0w</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creator>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><author>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Economic potential</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Market potential</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Scenario analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Techno-economic potential</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Vries, Bert J.M.</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><au>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2590</spage><epage>2610</epage><pages>2590-2610</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300
EJ
year
−1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10
¢
kWh
−1 of 200–300
PWh
year
−1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10
¢
kWh
−1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36565963 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Applied sciences Climate change Economic analysis Economic data Economic potential Electric energy Energy Energy economics Energy industry Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Market potential Natural energy Production costs Renewable energy Renewable energy sources Scenario analysis Studies Techno-economic potential Technological change Volatility |
title | Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renewable%20energy%20sources:%20Their%20global%20potential%20for%20the%20first-half%20of%20the%2021st%20century%20at%20a%20global%20level:%20An%20integrated%20approach&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=de%20Vries,%20Bert%20J.M.&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2590&rft.epage=2610&rft.pages=2590-2610&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1186100391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205329417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421506003326&rfr_iscdi=true |