Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach

The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a funct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610
Hauptverfasser: de Vries, Bert J.M., van Vuuren, Detlef P., Hoogwijk, Monique M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2610
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2590
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 35
creator de Vries, Bert J.M.
van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Hoogwijk, Monique M.
description The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300 EJ year −1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10 ¢ kWh −1 of 200–300 PWh year −1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10 ¢ kWh −1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36565963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421506003326</els_id><sourcerecordid>1186100391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQbUTBcfULvARBbz1Wkk66s-BhWXRXGBBkPYdMunomQ093m2RmmaN_bvXOquBBA5UqwntVr_KK4jWHJQeu3--WOExjvxQAeglmCSCeFAve1LLUdV0_LRYggZeV4Op58SKlHQBUjakWxY-vOOC9W_fIqIibE0vjIXpMl-xuiyGyTT-uXc-mMeOQA1XdGFneIutCTLncur5jY_fwInjKzBPsEE_MZeZ-kXs8Yn_JrgYWhoyb6DK2zE1THJ3fviyeda5P-OoxXxTfPn28u74tV19uPl9frUqvK8hlpRXodeuRNw1JB6x5baq1NOu26UByUclWoPdKNygbj7UURjfSoVBSe4_yonh37ktjvx8wZbsPyWPfuwHHQ7JSK62Mlv8F8qoBoTgn4Ju_gDv6u4GWsAIUza94TSB5Bvk4phSxs1MMexdPloOdzbM7-2Cenc2zYCyZR6zVmRVxQv-bgnQGnMFHK51UdJ0oiFlTChQVxTQ_KQNWaJqxzXtq9_ZRqUueHItu8CH9UdIoYwzMq38445CMOAaMNvmAg8c2RPTZtmP4p-yfpjjJ0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205329417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><description>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300 EJ year −1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10 ¢ kWh −1 of 200–300 PWh year −1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10 ¢ kWh −1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Applied sciences ; Climate change ; Economic analysis ; Economic data ; Economic potential ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy industry ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Market potential ; Natural energy ; Production costs ; Renewable energy ; Renewable energy sources ; Scenario analysis ; Studies ; Techno-economic potential ; Technological change ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18599903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a35_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a2590-2610.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300 EJ year −1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10 ¢ kWh −1 of 200–300 PWh year −1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10 ¢ kWh −1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Economic potential</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Market potential</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Scenario analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Techno-economic potential</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQbUTBcfULvARBbz1Wkk66s-BhWXRXGBBkPYdMunomQ093m2RmmaN_bvXOquBBA5UqwntVr_KK4jWHJQeu3--WOExjvxQAeglmCSCeFAve1LLUdV0_LRYggZeV4Op58SKlHQBUjakWxY-vOOC9W_fIqIibE0vjIXpMl-xuiyGyTT-uXc-mMeOQA1XdGFneIutCTLncur5jY_fwInjKzBPsEE_MZeZ-kXs8Yn_JrgYWhoyb6DK2zE1THJ3fviyeda5P-OoxXxTfPn28u74tV19uPl9frUqvK8hlpRXodeuRNw1JB6x5baq1NOu26UByUclWoPdKNygbj7UURjfSoVBSe4_yonh37ktjvx8wZbsPyWPfuwHHQ7JSK62Mlv8F8qoBoTgn4Ju_gDv6u4GWsAIUza94TSB5Bvk4phSxs1MMexdPloOdzbM7-2Cenc2zYCyZR6zVmRVxQv-bgnQGnMFHK51UdJ0oiFlTChQVxTQ_KQNWaJqxzXtq9_ZRqUueHItu8CH9UdIoYwzMq38445CMOAaMNvmAg8c2RPTZtmP4p-yfpjjJ0w</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creator>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</title><author>de Vries, Bert J.M. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hoogwijk, Monique M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-46506bdce1884890e71794b39bd8f031243d2ecc568e38ce7329683ae2536cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Economic potential</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Market potential</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Scenario analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Techno-economic potential</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Bert J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Vries, Bert J.M.</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><au>Hoogwijk, Monique M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2590</spage><epage>2610</epage><pages>2590-2610</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The risk of human-induced climate change and the volatility of world oil markets make non-fossil fuel options important. This paper investigates the potential for wind, solar-PV and biomass (WSB) to deliver energy. The focus is on land opportunities and constraints and on production costs as a function of resource availability and depletion and of innovation dynamics. The context is provided by the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated with the IMAGE 2.2 model. We explicitly consider several sources of uncertainty, aspects of the food vs. energy trade-off and the effects of interaction between the three options through their claims on land. We show that ‘potential production’ concepts are strongly dependent on the chosen land-use scenario—and should therefore be used with an indication of the underlying assumptions. Our results indicate a potential for liquid biofuels in the order of 75–300 EJ year −1 and for electricity from WSB options at production costs below 10 ¢ kWh −1 of 200–300 PWh year −1. Theoretically, future electricity demand can be amply met from WSB sources in most regions by 2050 below 10 ¢ kWh −1, but major uncertainties are the degree to which land is actually available and the rate and extent at which specific investment costs can be reduced. In some regions, competition for land among the three WSB options may significantly reduce the total potential as estimated from simple addition—which is another source of uncertainty.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2007-04, Vol.35 (4), p.2590-2610
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36565963
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Alternative energy sources
Applied sciences
Climate change
Economic analysis
Economic data
Economic potential
Electric energy
Energy
Energy economics
Energy industry
Exact sciences and technology
General, economic and professional studies
Market potential
Natural energy
Production costs
Renewable energy
Renewable energy sources
Scenario analysis
Studies
Techno-economic potential
Technological change
Volatility
title Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renewable%20energy%20sources:%20Their%20global%20potential%20for%20the%20first-half%20of%20the%2021st%20century%20at%20a%20global%20level:%20An%20integrated%20approach&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=de%20Vries,%20Bert%20J.M.&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2590&rft.epage=2610&rft.pages=2590-2610&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1186100391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205329417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421506003326&rfr_iscdi=true