Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq

In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and "casualty ratio" data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the "limited" American casualties in specific ope...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of conflict resolution 2006-12, Vol.50 (6), p.831-854
Hauptverfasser: Boettcher, William A., Cobb, Michael D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 6
container_start_page 831
container_title The Journal of conflict resolution
container_volume 50
creator Boettcher, William A.
Cobb, Michael D.
description In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and "casualty ratio" data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the "limited" American casualties in specific operations versus the "significant" number of insurgents killed. This article examines the extent to which body count/casualty ratio "frames" and individual casualty tolerance influence public perceptions about the war and the success or failure of U.S. military operations. Two experiments were conducted pitting alternative casualty frames against one another to measure their relative impact. The results demonstrate the influence of framing effects on public perceptions and clarify understanding of the determinants and impact of casualty tolerance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022002706293665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36555664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27638527</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0022002706293665</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27638527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b7f8f88d0ebad705e9cda50e0534c5c89c093f6a380033dfac89e5d7cfe7917b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0Lw4K2aJk3SnkTGpsLAgT_AU0nTl5nRNlvSHvbf262isIOHx4P3_Xy_7_EQuozJbRxLeUcIpX1JImjGhOBHaBRzTqNUCnGMRjs52umn6CyEFSF7doQ-p_rLQcDO4A8LbaPqezxRoVNVu8Uzr2rbLLFqSrzoispqvACvYd1a1-w9r53WEMKemClbdR6wbfCzV5tzdGJUFeDip4_R-2z6NnmK5i-Pz5OHeaRZItqokCY1aVoSKFQpCYdMl4oTIJwlmus00yRjRiiWEsJYaVQ_Al5KbUBmsSzYGN0MuWvvNh2ENq9t0FBVqgHXhZwJzrkQSQ9eH4Ar1_mmvy2nNOFc0n7BGJEB0t6F4MHka29r5bd5TPLdo_PDR_eWaLAEtYS_zH_4q4Ffhdb533wqBUs5lewbvCOFzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224557203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Boettcher, William A. ; Cobb, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boettcher, William A. ; Cobb, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and "casualty ratio" data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the "limited" American casualties in specific operations versus the "significant" number of insurgents killed. This article examines the extent to which body count/casualty ratio "frames" and individual casualty tolerance influence public perceptions about the war and the success or failure of U.S. military operations. Two experiments were conducted pitting alternative casualty frames against one another to measure their relative impact. The results demonstrate the influence of framing effects on public perceptions and clarify understanding of the determinants and impact of casualty tolerance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022002706293665</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCFRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Casualties ; Causality ; Conflict ; Conflict resolution ; Counterinsurgency ; Death ; Failure ; Impact analysis ; Insurgency ; International relations ; Iraq war ; Iraq War-2003 ; Killing ; Letters (Correspondence) ; Military ; Military engagements ; Military intervention ; Military operations ; Military policy ; Numbers ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Public opinion ; Studies ; Success ; U.S.A ; Voting ; War ; War casualties ; Warfare</subject><ispartof>The Journal of conflict resolution, 2006-12, Vol.50 (6), p.831-854</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Sage Publications</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b7f8f88d0ebad705e9cda50e0534c5c89c093f6a380033dfac89e5d7cfe7917b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27638527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27638527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12826,21800,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boettcher, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobb, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq</title><title>The Journal of conflict resolution</title><description>In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and "casualty ratio" data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the "limited" American casualties in specific operations versus the "significant" number of insurgents killed. This article examines the extent to which body count/casualty ratio "frames" and individual casualty tolerance influence public perceptions about the war and the success or failure of U.S. military operations. Two experiments were conducted pitting alternative casualty frames against one another to measure their relative impact. The results demonstrate the influence of framing effects on public perceptions and clarify understanding of the determinants and impact of casualty tolerance.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Casualties</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Counterinsurgency</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Insurgency</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Iraq war</subject><subject>Iraq War-2003</subject><subject>Killing</subject><subject>Letters (Correspondence)</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Military engagements</subject><subject>Military intervention</subject><subject>Military operations</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Numbers</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>War casualties</subject><subject>Warfare</subject><issn>0022-0027</issn><issn>1552-8766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0Lw4K2aJk3SnkTGpsLAgT_AU0nTl5nRNlvSHvbf262isIOHx4P3_Xy_7_EQuozJbRxLeUcIpX1JImjGhOBHaBRzTqNUCnGMRjs52umn6CyEFSF7doQ-p_rLQcDO4A8LbaPqezxRoVNVu8Uzr2rbLLFqSrzoispqvACvYd1a1-w9r53WEMKemClbdR6wbfCzV5tzdGJUFeDip4_R-2z6NnmK5i-Pz5OHeaRZItqokCY1aVoSKFQpCYdMl4oTIJwlmus00yRjRiiWEsJYaVQ_Al5KbUBmsSzYGN0MuWvvNh2ENq9t0FBVqgHXhZwJzrkQSQ9eH4Ar1_mmvy2nNOFc0n7BGJEB0t6F4MHka29r5bd5TPLdo_PDR_eWaLAEtYS_zH_4q4Ffhdb533wqBUs5lewbvCOFzw</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Boettcher, William A.</creator><creator>Cobb, Michael D.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq</title><author>Boettcher, William A. ; Cobb, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b7f8f88d0ebad705e9cda50e0534c5c89c093f6a380033dfac89e5d7cfe7917b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Casualties</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Counterinsurgency</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Insurgency</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Iraq war</topic><topic>Iraq War-2003</topic><topic>Killing</topic><topic>Letters (Correspondence)</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Military engagements</topic><topic>Military intervention</topic><topic>Military operations</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Numbers</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>War casualties</topic><topic>Warfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boettcher, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobb, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boettcher, William A.</au><au>Cobb, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>831</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>831-854</pages><issn>0022-0027</issn><eissn>1552-8766</eissn><coden>JCFRAL</coden><abstract>In the early stages of the counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq, military leaders resisted the release of body count and "casualty ratio" data. However, in the spring of 2004, the U.S. military (and American media) began to focus on the "limited" American casualties in specific operations versus the "significant" number of insurgents killed. This article examines the extent to which body count/casualty ratio "frames" and individual casualty tolerance influence public perceptions about the war and the success or failure of U.S. military operations. Two experiments were conducted pitting alternative casualty frames against one another to measure their relative impact. The results demonstrate the influence of framing effects on public perceptions and clarify understanding of the determinants and impact of casualty tolerance.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022002706293665</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0027
ispartof The Journal of conflict resolution, 2006-12, Vol.50 (6), p.831-854
issn 0022-0027
1552-8766
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36555664
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Armed forces
Casualties
Causality
Conflict
Conflict resolution
Counterinsurgency
Death
Failure
Impact analysis
Insurgency
International relations
Iraq war
Iraq War-2003
Killing
Letters (Correspondence)
Military
Military engagements
Military intervention
Military operations
Military policy
Numbers
Perception
Perceptions
Public opinion
Studies
Success
U.S.A
Voting
War
War casualties
Warfare
title Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Echoes%20of%20Vietnam?%20Casualty%20Framing%20and%20Public%20Perceptions%20of%20Success%20and%20Failure%20in%20Iraq&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20conflict%20resolution&rft.au=Boettcher,%20William%20A.&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=831&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=831-854&rft.issn=0022-0027&rft.eissn=1552-8766&rft.coden=JCFRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022002706293665&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27638527%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224557203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27638527&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022002706293665&rfr_iscdi=true