Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device

This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Field methods 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351
Hauptverfasser: Childs, Jennifer Hunter, Landreth, Ashley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 3
container_start_page 335
container_title Field methods
container_volume 18
creator Childs, Jennifer Hunter
Landreth, Ashley
description This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1525822X05286018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36548982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X05286018</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36548982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoqNN3H_vkW12SNm36OObXYKKIA99Kl9zMjC6pud3G_OttqSAIPt2v3z1wDiFXjN4wludjJriQnL9TwWVGmTwiZ0wIHidFVhz3PRdxfz8l54hrSqnMs_SMuImr6sOXdato5loIOwt7CONXwMY7Da4d1pVqrXcY7T9sDdECe76KnvyyH6d-02w7KJ4gWmxBRy8Q0HfCv5rRLeysggtyYqoa4fKnjsji_u5t-hjPnx9m08k8VgnjbWykNIUpmNZc5qaQQuhsqbNMLlNGlaoM54oBdDYV11ynhWA571IwqVGgUpOMyPWg2wT_uQVsy41FBXVdOfBbLJNMpLKQvAPpAKrgEQOYsgl2U4VDyWjZB1v-DbZ7iYcXrFZQrv02dE7xf_4bC9t66A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36548982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</creator><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05286018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Individual behaviour ; Interviewers ; Qualitative analysis ; Research methods ; Social interaction ; Social research ; Standardization</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X05286018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X05286018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><title>Field methods</title><description>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Interviewers</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoqNN3H_vkW12SNm36OObXYKKIA99Kl9zMjC6pud3G_OttqSAIPt2v3z1wDiFXjN4wludjJriQnL9TwWVGmTwiZ0wIHidFVhz3PRdxfz8l54hrSqnMs_SMuImr6sOXdato5loIOwt7CONXwMY7Da4d1pVqrXcY7T9sDdECe76KnvyyH6d-02w7KJ4gWmxBRy8Q0HfCv5rRLeysggtyYqoa4fKnjsji_u5t-hjPnx9m08k8VgnjbWykNIUpmNZc5qaQQuhsqbNMLlNGlaoM54oBdDYV11ynhWA571IwqVGgUpOMyPWg2wT_uQVsy41FBXVdOfBbLJNMpLKQvAPpAKrgEQOYsgl2U4VDyWjZB1v-DbZ7iYcXrFZQrv02dE7xf_4bC9t66A</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creator><creator>Landreth, Ashley</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><author>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Interviewers</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</au><au>Landreth, Ashley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>335-351</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X05286018</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-822X
ispartof Field methods, 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351
issn 1525-822X
1552-3969
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36548982
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sage Journals
subjects Data collection
Individual behaviour
Interviewers
Qualitative analysis
Research methods
Social interaction
Social research
Standardization
title Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Interviewer/Respondent%20Interactions%20while%20Using%20a%20Mobile%20Computer-Assisted%20Personal%20Interview%20Device&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=Childs,%20Jennifer%20Hunter&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=335-351&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X05286018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36548982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36548982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X05286018&rfr_iscdi=true