Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device
This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Field methods 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 335 |
container_title | Field methods |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Childs, Jennifer Hunter Landreth, Ashley |
description | This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1525822X05286018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36548982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X05286018</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36548982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoqNN3H_vkW12SNm36OObXYKKIA99Kl9zMjC6pud3G_OttqSAIPt2v3z1wDiFXjN4wludjJriQnL9TwWVGmTwiZ0wIHidFVhz3PRdxfz8l54hrSqnMs_SMuImr6sOXdato5loIOwt7CONXwMY7Da4d1pVqrXcY7T9sDdECe76KnvyyH6d-02w7KJ4gWmxBRy8Q0HfCv5rRLeysggtyYqoa4fKnjsji_u5t-hjPnx9m08k8VgnjbWykNIUpmNZc5qaQQuhsqbNMLlNGlaoM54oBdDYV11ynhWA571IwqVGgUpOMyPWg2wT_uQVsy41FBXVdOfBbLJNMpLKQvAPpAKrgEQOYsgl2U4VDyWjZB1v-DbZ7iYcXrFZQrv02dE7xf_4bC9t66A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36548982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</creator><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05286018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Individual behaviour ; Interviewers ; Qualitative analysis ; Research methods ; Social interaction ; Social research ; Standardization</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X05286018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X05286018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><title>Field methods</title><description>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Interviewers</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoqNN3H_vkW12SNm36OObXYKKIA99Kl9zMjC6pud3G_OttqSAIPt2v3z1wDiFXjN4wludjJriQnL9TwWVGmTwiZ0wIHidFVhz3PRdxfz8l54hrSqnMs_SMuImr6sOXdato5loIOwt7CONXwMY7Da4d1pVqrXcY7T9sDdECe76KnvyyH6d-02w7KJ4gWmxBRy8Q0HfCv5rRLeysggtyYqoa4fKnjsji_u5t-hjPnx9m08k8VgnjbWykNIUpmNZc5qaQQuhsqbNMLlNGlaoM54oBdDYV11ynhWA571IwqVGgUpOMyPWg2wT_uQVsy41FBXVdOfBbLJNMpLKQvAPpAKrgEQOYsgl2U4VDyWjZB1v-DbZ7iYcXrFZQrv02dE7xf_4bC9t66A</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creator><creator>Landreth, Ashley</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</title><author>Childs, Jennifer Hunter ; Landreth, Ashley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-f88f9f91dd287f9855d6bd668b410ccaf22c1ee018c2d2d495172177f4fcec4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Interviewers</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landreth, Ashley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childs, Jennifer Hunter</au><au>Landreth, Ashley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>335-351</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>This article explores interviewer/respondent interactions using a handheld computer (HHC) and identifies issues arising from using a self-administered paper form to create a mobile computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. To evaluate the success of this instrument, the authors used the behavior-coding method to evaluate a sample of about 220 audiotaped interviews to identify survey questions that cause problems at the administration and/or response stage. This article explores problems with the interview, as it was conductedon an HHC, both at a question level and overall. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the automation of this survey instrument encouraged standardized interviewing procedures by examining how interviewers read the questions and how respondents answer them. The authors discuss mode-specific problems that arose in the interview and proposesuggestionsfor futuresurveys thatuse a similar methodof datacollection.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X05286018</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-822X |
ispartof | Field methods, 2006-08, Vol.18 (3), p.335-351 |
issn | 1525-822X 1552-3969 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36548982 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sage Journals |
subjects | Data collection Individual behaviour Interviewers Qualitative analysis Research methods Social interaction Social research Standardization |
title | Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A00%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Interviewer/Respondent%20Interactions%20while%20Using%20a%20Mobile%20Computer-Assisted%20Personal%20Interview%20Device&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=Childs,%20Jennifer%20Hunter&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=335-351&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X05286018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36548982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36548982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X05286018&rfr_iscdi=true |