Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model
Resource economists are often asked to value a proposed change at one, and only one, recreational site; the model we develop and estimate is applicable for those cases. The application is valuing the elimination of fish consumption advisories on a large bay on Lake Michigan. The model is minimal but...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2006-02, Vol.88 (1), p.150-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 150 |
container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Morey, Edward R. Breffle, William S. |
description | Resource economists are often asked to value a proposed change at one, and only one, recreational site; the model we develop and estimate is applicable for those cases. The application is valuing the elimination of fish consumption advisories on a large bay on Lake Michigan. The model is minimal but complete: complete in that the choice set is not restricted, minimal in that only two conditional indirect utility functions are estimated. It is utility-theoretic and one does not have to collect characteristic data on all of the other fishing sites in the region. Data include the number of trips each individual currently takes to Green Bay, answers to "would you prefer to fish Green Bay under conditions A or B?" and how often each angler says they would fish Green Bay under different sets of conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3697972</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3697972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607X-5ee4f49d65d5306046f3442df5836212e79ad60a6ba313ac66eee14faea2b09d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAYhYsoOK7-A8HihXet-WrSeDfsrrMuKyK6y-BNyLRvZ1LTZkxadvbC_266lQFF0dzk4znnkHCSJClGOY7jdZtjxkVWEsFzghDPESoZyw8PksURPEwWCCGSSSTJ4-RJCG3cIizLRfL9RtvR9NtUp9VO91tITR_XjQm76TSYAdJbM-zcOKSVsxaqYTqPWq-rAbwJg6lCWutBpy46rf3FG95Mwa7bW4hBmxjSmd502qadq8E-TR412gZ49nM-Sa7fnn8-vciuPqzenS6vsoojsc4KANYwWfOiLijiiPGGMkbqpigpJ5iAkLrmSPONppjqinMAwKzRoMkGyZqeJK_m3L1330YIg-pMqMBa3YMbg6K8wDFJ_FOIpeRCyCIKX_4mbN3o-_gIRSjFnDDKo6icRZV3IXho1N7Hx_s7hZGa2lOtmkpSU0lqak_dt6cO0fp-tt4aC3f_7VPLy-X55cQmNJF7sI55dM5z4_4vadmfbvF8drVhcP7oo1wKKUjE2YzjL4DDEWv_VXFBRaEu1l_UCp_RFUEf1U3Uv5j1jXZKb-PnUdefCMIUYcRLXDD6A-6t1TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233162436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Morey, Edward R. ; Breffle, William S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morey, Edward R. ; Breffle, William S.</creatorcontrib><description>Resource economists are often asked to value a proposed change at one, and only one, recreational site; the model we develop and estimate is applicable for those cases. The application is valuing the elimination of fish consumption advisories on a large bay on Lake Michigan. The model is minimal but complete: complete in that the choice set is not restricted, minimal in that only two conditional indirect utility functions are estimated. It is utility-theoretic and one does not have to collect characteristic data on all of the other fishing sites in the region. Data include the number of trips each individual currently takes to Green Bay, answers to "would you prefer to fish Green Bay under conditions A or B?" and how often each angler says they would fish Green Bay under different sets of conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; attitudes and opinions ; bans and sanctions ; C510 ; Common fisheries policy ; Consumption ; contingent valuation ; Data collection ; decision support systems ; econometric models ; Economic models ; Environmental economics ; estimation ; Fees ; Fisheries ; Fishers ; Fishing ; food choices ; food contamination ; food safety ; Forecasts ; Freshwater ; freshwater fish ; Freshwater fishes ; human behavior ; intentions ; Lake Michigan ; Modeling ; Mountain biking ; natural resource economics ; natural resource management ; PCB ; Pisces ; Polychlorinated biphenyls ; Q220 ; recreation areas ; Resource management ; RP data ; single-site ; SP choice data ; SP frequency data ; Sport fishing ; Studies ; surveys ; Travel ; U.S.A ; Utility functions ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2006-02, Vol.88 (1), p.150-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Agricultural Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 American Agricultural Economics Association 2006</rights><rights>2006 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607X-5ee4f49d65d5306046f3442df5836212e79ad60a6ba313ac66eee14faea2b09d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607X-5ee4f49d65d5306046f3442df5836212e79ad60a6ba313ac66eee14faea2b09d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3697972$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3697972$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morey, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breffle, William S.</creatorcontrib><title>Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>Resource economists are often asked to value a proposed change at one, and only one, recreational site; the model we develop and estimate is applicable for those cases. The application is valuing the elimination of fish consumption advisories on a large bay on Lake Michigan. The model is minimal but complete: complete in that the choice set is not restricted, minimal in that only two conditional indirect utility functions are estimated. It is utility-theoretic and one does not have to collect characteristic data on all of the other fishing sites in the region. Data include the number of trips each individual currently takes to Green Bay, answers to "would you prefer to fish Green Bay under conditions A or B?" and how often each angler says they would fish Green Bay under different sets of conditions.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>attitudes and opinions</subject><subject>bans and sanctions</subject><subject>C510</subject><subject>Common fisheries policy</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>contingent valuation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>econometric models</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishers</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>food choices</subject><subject>food contamination</subject><subject>food safety</subject><subject>Forecasts</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>freshwater fish</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>human behavior</subject><subject>intentions</subject><subject>Lake Michigan</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Mountain biking</subject><subject>natural resource economics</subject><subject>natural resource management</subject><subject>PCB</subject><subject>Pisces</subject><subject>Polychlorinated biphenyls</subject><subject>Q220</subject><subject>recreation areas</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>RP data</subject><subject>single-site</subject><subject>SP choice data</subject><subject>SP frequency data</subject><subject>Sport fishing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAYhYsoOK7-A8HihXet-WrSeDfsrrMuKyK6y-BNyLRvZ1LTZkxadvbC_266lQFF0dzk4znnkHCSJClGOY7jdZtjxkVWEsFzghDPESoZyw8PksURPEwWCCGSSSTJ4-RJCG3cIizLRfL9RtvR9NtUp9VO91tITR_XjQm76TSYAdJbM-zcOKSVsxaqYTqPWq-rAbwJg6lCWutBpy46rf3FG95Mwa7bW4hBmxjSmd502qadq8E-TR412gZ49nM-Sa7fnn8-vciuPqzenS6vsoojsc4KANYwWfOiLijiiPGGMkbqpigpJ5iAkLrmSPONppjqinMAwKzRoMkGyZqeJK_m3L1330YIg-pMqMBa3YMbg6K8wDFJ_FOIpeRCyCIKX_4mbN3o-_gIRSjFnDDKo6icRZV3IXho1N7Hx_s7hZGa2lOtmkpSU0lqak_dt6cO0fp-tt4aC3f_7VPLy-X55cQmNJF7sI55dM5z4_4vadmfbvF8drVhcP7oo1wKKUjE2YzjL4DDEWv_VXFBRaEu1l_UCp_RFUEf1U3Uv5j1jXZKb-PnUdefCMIUYcRLXDD6A-6t1TQ</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Morey, Edward R.</creator><creator>Breffle, William S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Agricultural Economics Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model</title><author>Morey, Edward R. ; Breffle, William S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607X-5ee4f49d65d5306046f3442df5836212e79ad60a6ba313ac66eee14faea2b09d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>attitudes and opinions</topic><topic>bans and sanctions</topic><topic>C510</topic><topic>Common fisheries policy</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>contingent valuation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>econometric models</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishers</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>food choices</topic><topic>food contamination</topic><topic>food safety</topic><topic>Forecasts</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>freshwater fish</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>human behavior</topic><topic>intentions</topic><topic>Lake Michigan</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Mountain biking</topic><topic>natural resource economics</topic><topic>natural resource management</topic><topic>PCB</topic><topic>Pisces</topic><topic>Polychlorinated biphenyls</topic><topic>Q220</topic><topic>recreation areas</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>RP data</topic><topic>single-site</topic><topic>SP choice data</topic><topic>SP frequency data</topic><topic>Sport fishing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morey, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breffle, William S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morey, Edward R.</au><au>Breffle, William S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><stitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</stitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>150-161</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><coden>AJAEBA</coden><abstract>Resource economists are often asked to value a proposed change at one, and only one, recreational site; the model we develop and estimate is applicable for those cases. The application is valuing the elimination of fish consumption advisories on a large bay on Lake Michigan. The model is minimal but complete: complete in that the choice set is not restricted, minimal in that only two conditional indirect utility functions are estimated. It is utility-theoretic and one does not have to collect characteristic data on all of the other fishing sites in the region. Data include the number of trips each individual currently takes to Green Bay, answers to "would you prefer to fish Green Bay under conditions A or B?" and how often each angler says they would fish Green Bay under different sets of conditions.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2006-02, Vol.88 (1), p.150-161 |
issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513627 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Agricultural economics attitudes and opinions bans and sanctions C510 Common fisheries policy Consumption contingent valuation Data collection decision support systems econometric models Economic models Environmental economics estimation Fees Fisheries Fishers Fishing food choices food contamination food safety Forecasts Freshwater freshwater fish Freshwater fishes human behavior intentions Lake Michigan Modeling Mountain biking natural resource economics natural resource management PCB Pisces Polychlorinated biphenyls Q220 recreation areas Resource management RP data single-site SP choice data SP frequency data Sport fishing Studies surveys Travel U.S.A Utility functions Water pollution |
title | Valuing a change in a fishing site without collecting characteristics data on all fishing sites: a complete but minimal model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A15%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Valuing%20a%20change%20in%20a%20fishing%20site%20without%20collecting%20characteristics%20data%20on%20all%20fishing%20sites:%20a%20complete%20but%20minimal%20model&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Morey,%20Edward%20R.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=150-161&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft.coden=AJAEBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3697972%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233162436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3697972&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00844.x&rfr_iscdi=true |