Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures
This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, beh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2010-02, Vol.8 (1), p.65-89 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Elghazouli, A. Y. |
description | This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, behaviour factors, ductility considerations and capacity design verifications, are examined. The rationality and clarity of the design principles employed in Eurocode 8, especially those related to the explicit definitions of dissipative and non dissipative zones and associated capacity design criteria, are highlighted. Various requirements that differ notably from the provisions of other seismic codes are also pointed out. More importantly, several issues that can lead to unintentional departure from performance objectives or to impractical solutions, as a consequence of inherent assumptions or possible misinterpretations, are identified and a number of clarifications and modifications suggested. In particular, it is shown that the implications of stability and drift requirements as well as some capacity design checks in moment frames, together with the treatment of post-buckling response and the distribution of inelastic demand in braced frames, are areas that merit careful consideration within the design process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36433072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21266768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-2c6e3a0d10bed53f57926dd72acf8c291bc221d4a53b50e207bc2f35fda03143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQxxdRsD4-gLfgwdvqJNlku8dS6gMKXnrwFtJkUrbso2Z2D357U1cQBPE0r99_mOGfZTcc7jlA-UAcFJ_nAFVecaFyfZLNuCplzgulT79yyEvN386zC6I9gFBlBbNsvSBCoha7gfWBrcbYH9B2jLCmtnbMI9W7jh1i79CPEYmFPjIaEBsWom3RpyKObjjOrrKzYBvC6-94mW0eV5vlc75-fXpZLta5LbQecuE0Sguewxa9kiFdIrT3pbAuzJ2o-NYJwX1hldwqQAFlagSpgrcgeSEvs7tpbbrqfUQaTFuTw6axHfYjGakLKaEU_4KCC61LPU_g7S9w34-xSz8YAVJUBSiVID5BLvZEEYM5xLq18cNwMEcTzGSCSSaYowlGJ42YNJTYbofxZ_Hfok9gx4oj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203294055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Elghazouli, A. Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elghazouli, A. Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, behaviour factors, ductility considerations and capacity design verifications, are examined. The rationality and clarity of the design principles employed in Eurocode 8, especially those related to the explicit definitions of dissipative and non dissipative zones and associated capacity design criteria, are highlighted. Various requirements that differ notably from the provisions of other seismic codes are also pointed out. More importantly, several issues that can lead to unintentional departure from performance objectives or to impractical solutions, as a consequence of inherent assumptions or possible misinterpretations, are identified and a number of clarifications and modifications suggested. In particular, it is shown that the implications of stability and drift requirements as well as some capacity design checks in moment frames, together with the treatment of post-buckling response and the distribution of inelastic demand in braced frames, are areas that merit careful consideration within the design process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building codes ; Building materials ; Civil Engineering ; Design criteria ; Ductility ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Original Research Paper ; Seismic engineering ; Steel ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2010-02, Vol.8 (1), p.65-89</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-2c6e3a0d10bed53f57926dd72acf8c291bc221d4a53b50e207bc2f35fda03143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-2c6e3a0d10bed53f57926dd72acf8c291bc221d4a53b50e207bc2f35fda03143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elghazouli, A. Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, behaviour factors, ductility considerations and capacity design verifications, are examined. The rationality and clarity of the design principles employed in Eurocode 8, especially those related to the explicit definitions of dissipative and non dissipative zones and associated capacity design criteria, are highlighted. Various requirements that differ notably from the provisions of other seismic codes are also pointed out. More importantly, several issues that can lead to unintentional departure from performance objectives or to impractical solutions, as a consequence of inherent assumptions or possible misinterpretations, are identified and a number of clarifications and modifications suggested. In particular, it is shown that the implications of stability and drift requirements as well as some capacity design checks in moment frames, together with the treatment of post-buckling response and the distribution of inelastic demand in braced frames, are areas that merit careful consideration within the design process.</description><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQxxdRsD4-gLfgwdvqJNlku8dS6gMKXnrwFtJkUrbso2Z2D357U1cQBPE0r99_mOGfZTcc7jlA-UAcFJ_nAFVecaFyfZLNuCplzgulT79yyEvN386zC6I9gFBlBbNsvSBCoha7gfWBrcbYH9B2jLCmtnbMI9W7jh1i79CPEYmFPjIaEBsWom3RpyKObjjOrrKzYBvC6-94mW0eV5vlc75-fXpZLta5LbQecuE0Sguewxa9kiFdIrT3pbAuzJ2o-NYJwX1hldwqQAFlagSpgrcgeSEvs7tpbbrqfUQaTFuTw6axHfYjGakLKaEU_4KCC61LPU_g7S9w34-xSz8YAVJUBSiVID5BLvZEEYM5xLq18cNwMEcTzGSCSSaYowlGJ42YNJTYbofxZ_Hfok9gx4oj</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Elghazouli, A. Y.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures</title><author>Elghazouli, A. Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-2c6e3a0d10bed53f57926dd72acf8c291bc221d4a53b50e207bc2f35fda03143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elghazouli, A. Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elghazouli, A. Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>65-89</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>This paper assesses the fundamental approaches and main procedures adopted in the seismic design of steel frames, with emphasis on the provisions of Eurocode 8. The study covers moment-resisting as well as concentrically-braced frame configurations. Code requirements in terms of design concepts, behaviour factors, ductility considerations and capacity design verifications, are examined. The rationality and clarity of the design principles employed in Eurocode 8, especially those related to the explicit definitions of dissipative and non dissipative zones and associated capacity design criteria, are highlighted. Various requirements that differ notably from the provisions of other seismic codes are also pointed out. More importantly, several issues that can lead to unintentional departure from performance objectives or to impractical solutions, as a consequence of inherent assumptions or possible misinterpretations, are identified and a number of clarifications and modifications suggested. In particular, it is shown that the implications of stability and drift requirements as well as some capacity design checks in moment frames, together with the treatment of post-buckling response and the distribution of inelastic demand in braced frames, are areas that merit careful consideration within the design process.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2010-02, Vol.8 (1), p.65-89 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36433072 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Building codes Building materials Civil Engineering Design criteria Ductility Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Original Research Paper Seismic engineering Steel Structural Geology |
title | Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A26%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20European%20seismic%20design%20procedures%20for%20steel%20framed%20structures&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Elghazouli,%20A.%20Y.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=65-89&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21266768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203294055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |