An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector
Purpose - To investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) - an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design methodology approach - A survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 6...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of knowledge management 2005, Vol.9 (3), p.64-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Journal of knowledge management |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yew Wong, Kuan Aspinwall, Elaine |
description | Purpose - To investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) - an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design methodology approach - A survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 66 elements was developed. Through a postal survey, data were sought from SMEs in the UK. A parallel one was also administered to a group of academics, consultants and practitioners in the KM field in order to provide a more holistic view of the CSFs.Findings - The survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. Pertinent statistical analyses were then performed. By integrating the results from both groups of respondents, a prioritised list of CSFs, in order of importance for implementing KM, was generated.Research limitations implications - The number of responses received was rather small since KM is a new and emerging discipline, and not many SMEs have formally implemented it.Practical implications - The results of this study would help SMEs to better understand the KM discipline, to facilitate its adoption and to prioritise its practices. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the KM domain.Originality value - This study is probably the first to systematically determine the CSFs for KM implementation in the SME sector. It offers a beneficial source of information to SMEs, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to KM practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/13673270510602773 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36399236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36399236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-479c81210301fd9a2d4260454b03ccc4903c2dc065db35e86bce52cc4feb7bda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKxTAQBuAiCl4fwF1woRurmdy7FDleQHGhrkOapFptm5r0IL69OR5BUNRNJjDfn8BMUewCPgLA6hiokJRIzAELTKSkK8UGSK5KyRRbzffcLxdgvdhM6QljYBUTG4U-GZDvxza21nQoTXP3hkKDpkeP2n4McTLDhBpjpxATakJEz0N47bx78GVvBvPge5-BcWGc2jCgdviI3l7PUPKL0Hax1pgu-Z3PulXcn83uTi_Kq5vzy9OTq9IyUFPJZGUVEMAUQ-MqQxwjAjPOakyttazKhTiLBXc15V6J2npOcqPxtaydoVvFwfLdMYaXuU-T7ttkfdeZwYd50pJRSiosWJb7f0qep6ag4v9CKmhVkXz-B4lieRWcZrj3DT6FeRzyXDShmIJQABnBEtkYUoq-0WNsexPfNGC92LX-seucOVxm8jqi6dxX5DvVo2syx7_wX394B6Z-tms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230316811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Yew Wong, Kuan ; Aspinwall, Elaine</creator><creatorcontrib>Yew Wong, Kuan ; Aspinwall, Elaine</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - To investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) - an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design methodology approach - A survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 66 elements was developed. Through a postal survey, data were sought from SMEs in the UK. A parallel one was also administered to a group of academics, consultants and practitioners in the KM field in order to provide a more holistic view of the CSFs.Findings - The survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. Pertinent statistical analyses were then performed. By integrating the results from both groups of respondents, a prioritised list of CSFs, in order of importance for implementing KM, was generated.Research limitations implications - The number of responses received was rather small since KM is a new and emerging discipline, and not many SMEs have formally implemented it.Practical implications - The results of this study would help SMEs to better understand the KM discipline, to facilitate its adoption and to prioritise its practices. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the KM domain.Originality value - This study is probably the first to systematically determine the CSFs for KM implementation in the SME sector. It offers a beneficial source of information to SMEs, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to KM practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/13673270510602773</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Human resource management ; Information technology ; Infrastructure ; Knowledge management ; Project management ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Small business ; Small firms ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Success factors ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2005, Vol.9 (3), p.64-82</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-479c81210301fd9a2d4260454b03ccc4903c2dc065db35e86bce52cc4feb7bda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-479c81210301fd9a2d4260454b03ccc4903c2dc065db35e86bce52cc4feb7bda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13673270510602773/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13673270510602773/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,4024,11635,21695,27923,27924,27925,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yew Wong, Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aspinwall, Elaine</creatorcontrib><title>An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description>Purpose - To investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) - an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design methodology approach - A survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 66 elements was developed. Through a postal survey, data were sought from SMEs in the UK. A parallel one was also administered to a group of academics, consultants and practitioners in the KM field in order to provide a more holistic view of the CSFs.Findings - The survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. Pertinent statistical analyses were then performed. By integrating the results from both groups of respondents, a prioritised list of CSFs, in order of importance for implementing KM, was generated.Research limitations implications - The number of responses received was rather small since KM is a new and emerging discipline, and not many SMEs have formally implemented it.Practical implications - The results of this study would help SMEs to better understand the KM discipline, to facilitate its adoption and to prioritise its practices. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the KM domain.Originality value - This study is probably the first to systematically determine the CSFs for KM implementation in the SME sector. It offers a beneficial source of information to SMEs, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to KM practices.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Small firms</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success factors</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKxTAQBuAiCl4fwF1woRurmdy7FDleQHGhrkOapFptm5r0IL69OR5BUNRNJjDfn8BMUewCPgLA6hiokJRIzAELTKSkK8UGSK5KyRRbzffcLxdgvdhM6QljYBUTG4U-GZDvxza21nQoTXP3hkKDpkeP2n4McTLDhBpjpxATakJEz0N47bx78GVvBvPge5-BcWGc2jCgdviI3l7PUPKL0Hax1pgu-Z3PulXcn83uTi_Kq5vzy9OTq9IyUFPJZGUVEMAUQ-MqQxwjAjPOakyttazKhTiLBXc15V6J2npOcqPxtaydoVvFwfLdMYaXuU-T7ttkfdeZwYd50pJRSiosWJb7f0qep6ag4v9CKmhVkXz-B4lieRWcZrj3DT6FeRzyXDShmIJQABnBEtkYUoq-0WNsexPfNGC92LX-seucOVxm8jqi6dxX5DvVo2syx7_wX394B6Z-tms</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Yew Wong, Kuan</creator><creator>Aspinwall, Elaine</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector</title><author>Yew Wong, Kuan ; Aspinwall, Elaine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-479c81210301fd9a2d4260454b03ccc4903c2dc065db35e86bce52cc4feb7bda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Small firms</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success factors</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yew Wong, Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aspinwall, Elaine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yew Wong, Kuan</au><au>Aspinwall, Elaine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>64-82</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><abstract>Purpose - To investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) - an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design methodology approach - A survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 66 elements was developed. Through a postal survey, data were sought from SMEs in the UK. A parallel one was also administered to a group of academics, consultants and practitioners in the KM field in order to provide a more holistic view of the CSFs.Findings - The survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. Pertinent statistical analyses were then performed. By integrating the results from both groups of respondents, a prioritised list of CSFs, in order of importance for implementing KM, was generated.Research limitations implications - The number of responses received was rather small since KM is a new and emerging discipline, and not many SMEs have formally implemented it.Practical implications - The results of this study would help SMEs to better understand the KM discipline, to facilitate its adoption and to prioritise its practices. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the KM domain.Originality value - This study is probably the first to systematically determine the CSFs for KM implementation in the SME sector. It offers a beneficial source of information to SMEs, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to KM practices.</abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/13673270510602773</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-3270 |
ispartof | Journal of knowledge management, 2005, Vol.9 (3), p.64-82 |
issn | 1367-3270 1758-7484 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36399236 |
source | Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Evaluation Human resource management Information technology Infrastructure Knowledge management Project management Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Small business Small firms Statistical analysis Studies Success factors Surveys |
title | An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20empirical%20study%20of%20the%20important%20factors%20for%20knowledge-management%20adoption%20in%20the%20SME%20sector&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Yew%20Wong,%20Kuan&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=64-82&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/13673270510602773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36399236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230316811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |