The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid
In a restructured electricity market, utility-scale energy storage technologies such as advanced batteries can generate revenue by charging at low electricity prices and discharging at high prices. This strategy changes the magnitude and distribution of air quality emissions and the total carbon dio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of power sources 2010-04, Vol.195 (8), p.2405-2413 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2413 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2405 |
container_title | Journal of power sources |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Gilmore, Elisabeth A. Apt, Jay Walawalkar, Rahul Adams, Peter J. Lave, Lester B. |
description | In a restructured electricity market, utility-scale energy storage technologies such as advanced batteries can generate revenue by charging at low electricity prices and discharging at high prices. This strategy changes the magnitude and distribution of air quality emissions and the total carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions. We evaluate the social costs associated with these changes using a case study of 500
MW sodium–sulfur battery installations with 80% round-trip efficiency. The batteries displace peaking generators in New York City and charge using off-peak generation in the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) electricity grid during the summer. We identify and map charging and displaced plant types to generators in the NYISO. We then convert the emissions into ambient concentrations with a chemical transport model, the Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions (PMCAM
x
). Finally, we transform the concentrations into their equivalent human health effects and social benefits and costs. Reductions in premature mortality from fine particulate matter (PM
2.5) result in a benefit of 4.5
¢
kWh
−1 and 17
¢
kWh
−1 from displacing a natural gas and distillate fuel oil fueled peaking plant, respectively, in New York City. Ozone (O
3) concentrations increase due to decreases in nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) emissions, although the magnitude of the social cost is less certain. Adding the costs from charging, displacing a distillate fuel oil plant yields a net social benefit, while displacing the natural gas plant has a net social cost. With the existing base-load capacity, the upstate population experiences an increase in adverse health effects. If wind generation is charging the battery, both the upstate charging location and New York City benefit. At $20 per tonne of CO
2, the costs from CO
2 are small compared to those from air quality. We conclude that storage could be added to existing electricity grids as part of an integrated strategy from a human health standpoint. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36357170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378775309019235</els_id><sourcerecordid>21300849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c319a9b446ea0768fc89dbddf8b99b1688f85734b3f172c00cf0d427e17f24983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAUhC0EEkvhLyBf4Jbl2U5i-waqKCBVcKAcOFmO87zrJRtvbYfSf4-jLVx7etLTNzPSDCGvGWwZsP7dYXs4xbscl7TlALo-tyD5E7JhSoqGy657SjYgpGqk7MRz8iLnAwAwJmFD_tzskdqQ6O1ip1DuqZ1Hul-OdqZ7tFPZU_QeXck0ehrmgrtkS5h3dClh5Zvs7IR0sKVgCphXJtJSTb_iHf0Z0y_6vdiCFKfqkoJbM3YpjC_JM2-njK8e7gX5cfXx5vJzc_3t05fLD9eNa6EtjRNMWz20bY8WZK-8U3ocxtGrQeuB9Up51UnRDsIzyR2A8zC2XCKTnrdaiQvy9ux7SvF2wVzMMWSH02RnjEs2ohedrFU8CnImAFSrK9ifQZdizgm9OaVwtOneMDDrIuZg_i1i1kXWf12kCt88JNi1NZ_s7EL-r-ZcKA2CVe79mcPay--AyWQXcHY4hlRLNGMMj0X9BTDWpz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21300849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gilmore, Elisabeth A. ; Apt, Jay ; Walawalkar, Rahul ; Adams, Peter J. ; Lave, Lester B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Elisabeth A. ; Apt, Jay ; Walawalkar, Rahul ; Adams, Peter J. ; Lave, Lester B.</creatorcontrib><description>In a restructured electricity market, utility-scale energy storage technologies such as advanced batteries can generate revenue by charging at low electricity prices and discharging at high prices. This strategy changes the magnitude and distribution of air quality emissions and the total carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions. We evaluate the social costs associated with these changes using a case study of 500
MW sodium–sulfur battery installations with 80% round-trip efficiency. The batteries displace peaking generators in New York City and charge using off-peak generation in the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) electricity grid during the summer. We identify and map charging and displaced plant types to generators in the NYISO. We then convert the emissions into ambient concentrations with a chemical transport model, the Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions (PMCAM
x
). Finally, we transform the concentrations into their equivalent human health effects and social benefits and costs. Reductions in premature mortality from fine particulate matter (PM
2.5) result in a benefit of 4.5
¢
kWh
−1 and 17
¢
kWh
−1 from displacing a natural gas and distillate fuel oil fueled peaking plant, respectively, in New York City. Ozone (O
3) concentrations increase due to decreases in nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) emissions, although the magnitude of the social cost is less certain. Adding the costs from charging, displacing a distillate fuel oil plant yields a net social benefit, while displacing the natural gas plant has a net social cost. With the existing base-load capacity, the upstate population experiences an increase in adverse health effects. If wind generation is charging the battery, both the upstate charging location and New York City benefit. At $20 per tonne of CO
2, the costs from CO
2 are small compared to those from air quality. We conclude that storage could be added to existing electricity grids as part of an integrated strategy from a human health standpoint.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.072</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSODZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Ambient air quality ; Applied sciences ; Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation ; Electric energy storage ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Electrical power engineering ; Electrochemical conversion: primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells ; Emissions ; Energy accumulation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Human health costs ; Miscellaneous ; Power networks and lines</subject><ispartof>Journal of power sources, 2010-04, Vol.195 (8), p.2405-2413</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c319a9b446ea0768fc89dbddf8b99b1688f85734b3f172c00cf0d427e17f24983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c319a9b446ea0768fc89dbddf8b99b1688f85734b3f172c00cf0d427e17f24983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22389031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apt, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walawalkar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lave, Lester B.</creatorcontrib><title>The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid</title><title>Journal of power sources</title><description>In a restructured electricity market, utility-scale energy storage technologies such as advanced batteries can generate revenue by charging at low electricity prices and discharging at high prices. This strategy changes the magnitude and distribution of air quality emissions and the total carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions. We evaluate the social costs associated with these changes using a case study of 500
MW sodium–sulfur battery installations with 80% round-trip efficiency. The batteries displace peaking generators in New York City and charge using off-peak generation in the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) electricity grid during the summer. We identify and map charging and displaced plant types to generators in the NYISO. We then convert the emissions into ambient concentrations with a chemical transport model, the Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions (PMCAM
x
). Finally, we transform the concentrations into their equivalent human health effects and social benefits and costs. Reductions in premature mortality from fine particulate matter (PM
2.5) result in a benefit of 4.5
¢
kWh
−1 and 17
¢
kWh
−1 from displacing a natural gas and distillate fuel oil fueled peaking plant, respectively, in New York City. Ozone (O
3) concentrations increase due to decreases in nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) emissions, although the magnitude of the social cost is less certain. Adding the costs from charging, displacing a distillate fuel oil plant yields a net social benefit, while displacing the natural gas plant has a net social cost. With the existing base-load capacity, the upstate population experiences an increase in adverse health effects. If wind generation is charging the battery, both the upstate charging location and New York City benefit. At $20 per tonne of CO
2, the costs from CO
2 are small compared to those from air quality. We conclude that storage could be added to existing electricity grids as part of an integrated strategy from a human health standpoint.</description><subject>Ambient air quality</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation</subject><subject>Electric energy storage</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrochemical conversion: primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy accumulation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Human health costs</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Power networks and lines</subject><issn>0378-7753</issn><issn>1873-2755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAUhC0EEkvhLyBf4Jbl2U5i-waqKCBVcKAcOFmO87zrJRtvbYfSf4-jLVx7etLTNzPSDCGvGWwZsP7dYXs4xbscl7TlALo-tyD5E7JhSoqGy657SjYgpGqk7MRz8iLnAwAwJmFD_tzskdqQ6O1ip1DuqZ1Hul-OdqZ7tFPZU_QeXck0ehrmgrtkS5h3dClh5Zvs7IR0sKVgCphXJtJSTb_iHf0Z0y_6vdiCFKfqkoJbM3YpjC_JM2-njK8e7gX5cfXx5vJzc_3t05fLD9eNa6EtjRNMWz20bY8WZK-8U3ocxtGrQeuB9Up51UnRDsIzyR2A8zC2XCKTnrdaiQvy9ux7SvF2wVzMMWSH02RnjEs2ohedrFU8CnImAFSrK9ifQZdizgm9OaVwtOneMDDrIuZg_i1i1kXWf12kCt88JNi1NZ_s7EL-r-ZcKA2CVe79mcPay--AyWQXcHY4hlRLNGMMj0X9BTDWpz0</recordid><startdate>20100415</startdate><enddate>20100415</enddate><creator>Gilmore, Elisabeth A.</creator><creator>Apt, Jay</creator><creator>Walawalkar, Rahul</creator><creator>Adams, Peter J.</creator><creator>Lave, Lester B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100415</creationdate><title>The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid</title><author>Gilmore, Elisabeth A. ; Apt, Jay ; Walawalkar, Rahul ; Adams, Peter J. ; Lave, Lester B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c319a9b446ea0768fc89dbddf8b99b1688f85734b3f172c00cf0d427e17f24983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Ambient air quality</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation</topic><topic>Electric energy storage</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrochemical conversion: primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy accumulation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Human health costs</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Power networks and lines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apt, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walawalkar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lave, Lester B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilmore, Elisabeth A.</au><au>Apt, Jay</au><au>Walawalkar, Rahul</au><au>Adams, Peter J.</au><au>Lave, Lester B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid</atitle><jtitle>Journal of power sources</jtitle><date>2010-04-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2405</spage><epage>2413</epage><pages>2405-2413</pages><issn>0378-7753</issn><eissn>1873-2755</eissn><coden>JPSODZ</coden><abstract>In a restructured electricity market, utility-scale energy storage technologies such as advanced batteries can generate revenue by charging at low electricity prices and discharging at high prices. This strategy changes the magnitude and distribution of air quality emissions and the total carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions. We evaluate the social costs associated with these changes using a case study of 500
MW sodium–sulfur battery installations with 80% round-trip efficiency. The batteries displace peaking generators in New York City and charge using off-peak generation in the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) electricity grid during the summer. We identify and map charging and displaced plant types to generators in the NYISO. We then convert the emissions into ambient concentrations with a chemical transport model, the Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions (PMCAM
x
). Finally, we transform the concentrations into their equivalent human health effects and social benefits and costs. Reductions in premature mortality from fine particulate matter (PM
2.5) result in a benefit of 4.5
¢
kWh
−1 and 17
¢
kWh
−1 from displacing a natural gas and distillate fuel oil fueled peaking plant, respectively, in New York City. Ozone (O
3) concentrations increase due to decreases in nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) emissions, although the magnitude of the social cost is less certain. Adding the costs from charging, displacing a distillate fuel oil plant yields a net social benefit, while displacing the natural gas plant has a net social cost. With the existing base-load capacity, the upstate population experiences an increase in adverse health effects. If wind generation is charging the battery, both the upstate charging location and New York City benefit. At $20 per tonne of CO
2, the costs from CO
2 are small compared to those from air quality. We conclude that storage could be added to existing electricity grids as part of an integrated strategy from a human health standpoint.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.072</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7753 |
ispartof | Journal of power sources, 2010-04, Vol.195 (8), p.2405-2413 |
issn | 0378-7753 1873-2755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36357170 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Ambient air quality Applied sciences Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation Electric energy storage Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering Electrical power engineering Electrochemical conversion: primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells Emissions Energy accumulation Exact sciences and technology Human health costs Miscellaneous Power networks and lines |
title | The air quality and human health effects of integrating utility-scale batteries into the New York State electricity grid |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20air%20quality%20and%20human%20health%20effects%20of%20integrating%20utility-scale%20batteries%20into%20the%20New%20York%20State%20electricity%20grid&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20power%20sources&rft.au=Gilmore,%20Elisabeth%20A.&rft.date=2010-04-15&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2405&rft.epage=2413&rft.pages=2405-2413&rft.issn=0378-7753&rft.eissn=1873-2755&rft.coden=JPSODZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21300849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21300849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378775309019235&rfr_iscdi=true |