A comparison between SVC and transcoding
This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on consumer electronics 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1446 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1439 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on consumer electronics |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Liu, Hui Wang, Ye-kui Li, Houqiang |
| description | This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36319892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4637638</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>875062828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwI7FEDMCScrbjrxFF5UOqxEBhtRznglK1SbFTIf49rloYGNANN9zzvtI9hJxTmFAK5nZeTicMQE8KyZXk-oCMqBA6LyhTh2QEYHTOQfJjchLjAoAWgukRubnLfL9au9DGvssqHD4Ru-zlrcxcV2dDcF30fd1276fkqHHLiGf7PSav99N5-ZjPnh-eyrtZ7rngQy4NuqKRTmGFtDCNg9oUniIYVFQrUVBNQbk0om4AuaxELbxKOPe6coaPyfWudx36jw3Gwa7a6HG5dB32m2hTB0immU7k1b8kl5wabVgCL_-Ai34TuvSF1ZJxRRVTCYId5EMfY8DGrkO7cuHLUrBbwzYZtlvDdm84RS52kRYRf_Gf6zcAHnS6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862371727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-3063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Automatic voltage control ; Bit rate ; comparison ; Complexity ; Computation ; Computational complexity ; Computer simulation ; Decoding ; Discrete cosine transforms ; Electronics ; Extraction ; Rate- Distortion (RD) performance ; Reduction ; Scalability ; Spatial resolution ; Static VAr compensators ; SVC ; Transcoding ; Video coding</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics, 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4637638$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4637638$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ye-kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><title>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</title><addtitle>T-CE</addtitle><description>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Automatic voltage control</subject><subject>Bit rate</subject><subject>comparison</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computational complexity</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Discrete cosine transforms</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Rate- Distortion (RD) performance</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Scalability</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Static VAr compensators</subject><subject>SVC</subject><subject>Transcoding</subject><subject>Video coding</subject><issn>0098-3063</issn><issn>1558-4127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwI7FEDMCScrbjrxFF5UOqxEBhtRznglK1SbFTIf49rloYGNANN9zzvtI9hJxTmFAK5nZeTicMQE8KyZXk-oCMqBA6LyhTh2QEYHTOQfJjchLjAoAWgukRubnLfL9au9DGvssqHD4Ru-zlrcxcV2dDcF30fd1276fkqHHLiGf7PSav99N5-ZjPnh-eyrtZ7rngQy4NuqKRTmGFtDCNg9oUniIYVFQrUVBNQbk0om4AuaxELbxKOPe6coaPyfWudx36jw3Gwa7a6HG5dB32m2hTB0immU7k1b8kl5wabVgCL_-Ai34TuvSF1ZJxRRVTCYId5EMfY8DGrkO7cuHLUrBbwzYZtlvDdm84RS52kRYRf_Gf6zcAHnS6</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Liu, Hui</creator><creator>Wang, Ye-kui</creator><creator>Li, Houqiang</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><author>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Automatic voltage control</topic><topic>Bit rate</topic><topic>comparison</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computational complexity</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Discrete cosine transforms</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Rate- Distortion (RD) performance</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Scalability</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Static VAr compensators</topic><topic>SVC</topic><topic>Transcoding</topic><topic>Video coding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ye-kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Hui</au><au>Wang, Ye-kui</au><au>Li, Houqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</jtitle><stitle>T-CE</stitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1439</spage><epage>1446</epage><pages>1439-1446</pages><issn>0098-3063</issn><eissn>1558-4127</eissn><coden>ITCEDA</coden><abstract>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-3063 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on consumer electronics, 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446 |
| issn | 0098-3063 1558-4127 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36319892 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Adaptation Automatic voltage control Bit rate comparison Complexity Computation Computational complexity Computer simulation Decoding Discrete cosine transforms Electronics Extraction Rate- Distortion (RD) performance Reduction Scalability Spatial resolution Static VAr compensators SVC Transcoding Video coding |
| title | A comparison between SVC and transcoding |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20SVC%20and%20transcoding&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20consumer%20electronics&rft.au=Liu,%20Hui&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1439&rft.epage=1446&rft.pages=1439-1446&rft.issn=0098-3063&rft.eissn=1558-4127&rft.coden=ITCEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E875062828%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862371727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4637638&rfr_iscdi=true |