The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model
Using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting numerical model, the impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structure of a numerically simulated tropical cyclone (TC), and their relationship to storm intensity was investigated with a set of five numerical simulation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2009-11, Vol.137 (11), p.3717-3743 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3743 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3717 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | FIERRO, Alexandre O ROGERS, Robert F MARKS, Frank D NOLAN, David S |
description | Using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting numerical model, the impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structure of a numerically simulated tropical cyclone (TC), and their relationship to storm intensity was investigated with a set of five numerical simulations using input data for the case of Hurricane Rita (2005). The horizontal grid spacing of the parent domain was systematically changed such that the horizontal grid spacing of the inner nest varied from 1 to 5 km by an increment of 1 km, this while keeping geographical dimensions of the domains identical.
Within this small range of horizontal grid spacing, the morphology of the simulated storms and the evolution of the kinematic and microphysics field showed noteworthy differences. As grid spacing increased, the model produced a wider, more tilted eyewall, a larger radius of maximum winds, and higher-amplitude, low wavenumber eyewall asymmetries. The coarser-resolution simulations also produced larger volume, areal coverage, and mass flux of updraft speeds ≥5 m s−1; larger volumes of condensate and ice-phase particles aloft; larger boundary layer kinetic energy; and a stronger secondary circulation. While the contribution of updrafts ≥5 m s−1 to the total updraft mass flux varied little between the five cases, the contribution of downdrafts ≤−2 m s−1 to the total downdraft mass flux was by far the largest in the finest-resolution simulation.
Despite these structural differences, all of the simulations produced storms of similar intensity, as measured by peak 10-m wind speed and minimum surface pressure, suggesting that features in the higher-resolution simulations that tend to weaken TCs (i.e., smaller area of high surface fluxes and weaker total updraft mass flux) compensate for features that favor TC intensity (i.e., smaller-amplitude eyewall asymmetries and larger radial gradients). This raises the possibility that resolution increases in this range may not be as important as other model features (e.g., physical parameterization and initial condition improvements) for improving TC intensity forecasts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2009MWR2946.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36280202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21189507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-13d8324ab1bc156edef67be12fdc5d162662baef8dba0113b112ae035eba03153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d-L1DAQB_AgCq6nj74HRd96zkzatH08Fu8H3iLsruxjSdPUzdE2a5Ii619xf_LlfiAiiE9hmM98ITOMvUU4RSyLTwRQr3ZrqnN5is_YAguCDPJaPGcLACozkHn-kr0K4QYApMxpwW63e8OvxoPSkbueXzpvf7kpqoFfeNvxTWrY6Tt3E48Jrqz27rA_BquTUFPHv9jJjCpazTfRzzrO3oT7oFS5NLdN_MEuj3pwU-pt7DgPKpqO_7Rx_5C6W59nZ-sdX7nODK_Zi14Nwbx5ek_Yt_PP2-Vldv314mp5dp3pnKqYoegqQblqsdVYSNOZXpatQeo7XXQoSUpqlemrrlWAKFpEUgZEYVItsBAn7ONj7sG7H7MJsRlt0GYY1GTcHBohqQIC-i8kxKouoEzw_V_wxs1-Sp9oqKKS8qoQIql3_1JYV0h1nUNC2SNK6w7Bm745eDsqf2wQmvtbN3_cusHkPzyFqpC23Xs1aRt-DxGlhYCQ4g7HFai7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198129940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FIERRO, Alexandre O ; ROGERS, Robert F ; MARKS, Frank D ; NOLAN, David S</creator><creatorcontrib>FIERRO, Alexandre O ; ROGERS, Robert F ; MARKS, Frank D ; NOLAN, David S</creatorcontrib><description>Using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting numerical model, the impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structure of a numerically simulated tropical cyclone (TC), and their relationship to storm intensity was investigated with a set of five numerical simulations using input data for the case of Hurricane Rita (2005). The horizontal grid spacing of the parent domain was systematically changed such that the horizontal grid spacing of the inner nest varied from 1 to 5 km by an increment of 1 km, this while keeping geographical dimensions of the domains identical.
Within this small range of horizontal grid spacing, the morphology of the simulated storms and the evolution of the kinematic and microphysics field showed noteworthy differences. As grid spacing increased, the model produced a wider, more tilted eyewall, a larger radius of maximum winds, and higher-amplitude, low wavenumber eyewall asymmetries. The coarser-resolution simulations also produced larger volume, areal coverage, and mass flux of updraft speeds ≥5 m s−1; larger volumes of condensate and ice-phase particles aloft; larger boundary layer kinetic energy; and a stronger secondary circulation. While the contribution of updrafts ≥5 m s−1 to the total updraft mass flux varied little between the five cases, the contribution of downdrafts ≤−2 m s−1 to the total downdraft mass flux was by far the largest in the finest-resolution simulation.
Despite these structural differences, all of the simulations produced storms of similar intensity, as measured by peak 10-m wind speed and minimum surface pressure, suggesting that features in the higher-resolution simulations that tend to weaken TCs (i.e., smaller area of high surface fluxes and weaker total updraft mass flux) compensate for features that favor TC intensity (i.e., smaller-amplitude eyewall asymmetries and larger radial gradients). This raises the possibility that resolution increases in this range may not be as important as other model features (e.g., physical parameterization and initial condition improvements) for improving TC intensity forecasts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2009MWR2946.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Amplitude ; Amplitudes ; Asymmetry ; Boundary layer ; Boundary layers ; Cyclones ; Data assimilation ; Domains ; Downdraft ; Earth, ocean, space ; Evacuations & rescues ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fluctuations ; Fluid dynamics ; Hurricanes ; Ice ; Kinematics ; Kinetic energy ; Mass ; Mass flux ; Mathematical models ; Maximum winds ; Meteorology ; Microphysics ; Modelling ; Numerical models ; Numerical simulations ; Parameterization ; Pressure ; Simulation ; Snow ; Storms ; Surface fluxes ; Surface pressure ; Tropical cyclone intensities ; Tropical cyclones ; Updraft ; Wavelengths ; Weather forecasting ; Wind speed ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2009-11, Vol.137 (11), p.3717-3743</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Nov 2009</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-13d8324ab1bc156edef67be12fdc5d162662baef8dba0113b112ae035eba03153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-13d8324ab1bc156edef67be12fdc5d162662baef8dba0113b112ae035eba03153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22162036$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FIERRO, Alexandre O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGERS, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOLAN, David S</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting numerical model, the impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structure of a numerically simulated tropical cyclone (TC), and their relationship to storm intensity was investigated with a set of five numerical simulations using input data for the case of Hurricane Rita (2005). The horizontal grid spacing of the parent domain was systematically changed such that the horizontal grid spacing of the inner nest varied from 1 to 5 km by an increment of 1 km, this while keeping geographical dimensions of the domains identical.
Within this small range of horizontal grid spacing, the morphology of the simulated storms and the evolution of the kinematic and microphysics field showed noteworthy differences. As grid spacing increased, the model produced a wider, more tilted eyewall, a larger radius of maximum winds, and higher-amplitude, low wavenumber eyewall asymmetries. The coarser-resolution simulations also produced larger volume, areal coverage, and mass flux of updraft speeds ≥5 m s−1; larger volumes of condensate and ice-phase particles aloft; larger boundary layer kinetic energy; and a stronger secondary circulation. While the contribution of updrafts ≥5 m s−1 to the total updraft mass flux varied little between the five cases, the contribution of downdrafts ≤−2 m s−1 to the total downdraft mass flux was by far the largest in the finest-resolution simulation.
Despite these structural differences, all of the simulations produced storms of similar intensity, as measured by peak 10-m wind speed and minimum surface pressure, suggesting that features in the higher-resolution simulations that tend to weaken TCs (i.e., smaller area of high surface fluxes and weaker total updraft mass flux) compensate for features that favor TC intensity (i.e., smaller-amplitude eyewall asymmetries and larger radial gradients). This raises the possibility that resolution increases in this range may not be as important as other model features (e.g., physical parameterization and initial condition improvements) for improving TC intensity forecasts.</description><subject>Amplitude</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Data assimilation</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Downdraft</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Evacuations & rescues</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Mass</subject><subject>Mass flux</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maximum winds</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Microphysics</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surface fluxes</subject><subject>Surface pressure</subject><subject>Tropical cyclone intensities</subject><subject>Tropical cyclones</subject><subject>Updraft</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d-L1DAQB_AgCq6nj74HRd96zkzatH08Fu8H3iLsruxjSdPUzdE2a5Ii619xf_LlfiAiiE9hmM98ITOMvUU4RSyLTwRQr3ZrqnN5is_YAguCDPJaPGcLACozkHn-kr0K4QYApMxpwW63e8OvxoPSkbueXzpvf7kpqoFfeNvxTWrY6Tt3E48Jrqz27rA_BquTUFPHv9jJjCpazTfRzzrO3oT7oFS5NLdN_MEuj3pwU-pt7DgPKpqO_7Rx_5C6W59nZ-sdX7nODK_Zi14Nwbx5ek_Yt_PP2-Vldv314mp5dp3pnKqYoegqQblqsdVYSNOZXpatQeo7XXQoSUpqlemrrlWAKFpEUgZEYVItsBAn7ONj7sG7H7MJsRlt0GYY1GTcHBohqQIC-i8kxKouoEzw_V_wxs1-Sp9oqKKS8qoQIql3_1JYV0h1nUNC2SNK6w7Bm745eDsqf2wQmvtbN3_cusHkPzyFqpC23Xs1aRt-DxGlhYCQ4g7HFai7</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>FIERRO, Alexandre O</creator><creator>ROGERS, Robert F</creator><creator>MARKS, Frank D</creator><creator>NOLAN, David S</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model</title><author>FIERRO, Alexandre O ; ROGERS, Robert F ; MARKS, Frank D ; NOLAN, David S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-13d8324ab1bc156edef67be12fdc5d162662baef8dba0113b112ae035eba03153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Amplitude</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Data assimilation</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Downdraft</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Evacuations & rescues</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Mass</topic><topic>Mass flux</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maximum winds</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Microphysics</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surface fluxes</topic><topic>Surface pressure</topic><topic>Tropical cyclone intensities</topic><topic>Tropical cyclones</topic><topic>Updraft</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FIERRO, Alexandre O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGERS, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Frank D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOLAN, David S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FIERRO, Alexandre O</au><au>ROGERS, Robert F</au><au>MARKS, Frank D</au><au>NOLAN, David S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3717</spage><epage>3743</epage><pages>3717-3743</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecasting numerical model, the impact of horizontal grid spacing on the microphysical and kinematic structure of a numerically simulated tropical cyclone (TC), and their relationship to storm intensity was investigated with a set of five numerical simulations using input data for the case of Hurricane Rita (2005). The horizontal grid spacing of the parent domain was systematically changed such that the horizontal grid spacing of the inner nest varied from 1 to 5 km by an increment of 1 km, this while keeping geographical dimensions of the domains identical.
Within this small range of horizontal grid spacing, the morphology of the simulated storms and the evolution of the kinematic and microphysics field showed noteworthy differences. As grid spacing increased, the model produced a wider, more tilted eyewall, a larger radius of maximum winds, and higher-amplitude, low wavenumber eyewall asymmetries. The coarser-resolution simulations also produced larger volume, areal coverage, and mass flux of updraft speeds ≥5 m s−1; larger volumes of condensate and ice-phase particles aloft; larger boundary layer kinetic energy; and a stronger secondary circulation. While the contribution of updrafts ≥5 m s−1 to the total updraft mass flux varied little between the five cases, the contribution of downdrafts ≤−2 m s−1 to the total downdraft mass flux was by far the largest in the finest-resolution simulation.
Despite these structural differences, all of the simulations produced storms of similar intensity, as measured by peak 10-m wind speed and minimum surface pressure, suggesting that features in the higher-resolution simulations that tend to weaken TCs (i.e., smaller area of high surface fluxes and weaker total updraft mass flux) compensate for features that favor TC intensity (i.e., smaller-amplitude eyewall asymmetries and larger radial gradients). This raises the possibility that resolution increases in this range may not be as important as other model features (e.g., physical parameterization and initial condition improvements) for improving TC intensity forecasts.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2009MWR2946.1</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2009-11, Vol.137 (11), p.3717-3743 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36280202 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amplitude Amplitudes Asymmetry Boundary layer Boundary layers Cyclones Data assimilation Domains Downdraft Earth, ocean, space Evacuations & rescues Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Fluctuations Fluid dynamics Hurricanes Ice Kinematics Kinetic energy Mass Mass flux Mathematical models Maximum winds Meteorology Microphysics Modelling Numerical models Numerical simulations Parameterization Pressure Simulation Snow Storms Surface fluxes Surface pressure Tropical cyclone intensities Tropical cyclones Updraft Wavelengths Weather forecasting Wind speed Winds |
title | The Impact of Horizontal Grid Spacing on the Microphysical and Kinematic Structures of Strong Tropical Cyclones Simulated with the WRF-ARW Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Horizontal%20Grid%20Spacing%20on%20the%20Microphysical%20and%20Kinematic%20Structures%20of%20Strong%20Tropical%20Cyclones%20Simulated%20with%20the%20WRF-ARW%20Model&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=FIERRO,%20Alexandre%20O&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3717&rft.epage=3743&rft.pages=3717-3743&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2009MWR2946.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21189507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198129940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |