Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)

A discussion of an anonymous review of Darwin's "Origin of Species" in the Jul 1860 "Quarterly Review," is presented. The review was written by Darwin's nemesis Samuel Wilberforce, who was soon debunked by T. H. Huxley in a famous debate.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural history 1986-04, Vol.95 (4), p.16-16
1. Verfasser: Gould, Stephen Jay
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 4
container_start_page 16
container_title Natural history
container_volume 95
creator Gould, Stephen Jay
description A discussion of an anonymous review of Darwin's "Origin of Species" in the Jul 1860 "Quarterly Review," is presented. The review was written by Darwin's nemesis Samuel Wilberforce, who was soon debunked by T. H. Huxley in a famous debate.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36242063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A4188966</galeid><sourcerecordid>A4188966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1623-86b98ebb3a8790246685304782040922ce16cd6820f6add6bac26f7c73c2d6b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0D1PwzAQBuAMIFEK_8ETBaEg-5ycnbGE8iEVdSiIMXJcJzVy4xKnAv49RmUGbjm9rx7dcAfJiFKQKRUMjpLjEF5pnJyzUfK49Gr7SZZqMwnE-dbqK3J-bcPab7_LnXHkxbra9I3vtYlG93aw2oZNIL4h5Vr1zgRyo_p3212cJIeNcsGc_uxx8nw7eyrv0_ni7qGcztOWIfBUYl1IU9dcSVFQyBBlzmkmJNCMFgDaMNQrjLFBtVphrTRgI7TgGmICPk7O9ne3vX_bmTBUGxu0cU51xu9CxREyoMj_BSkCi3DyKwRGkeWigD8lKyTmVAgR5eVetsqZynbad4P5GLR3zrSmih8pF9U0Y1IWiPwLAgt_fQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>198650777</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)</title><source>American Museum of Natural History Research Library</source><creator>Gould, Stephen Jay</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, Stephen Jay</creatorcontrib><description>A discussion of an anonymous review of Darwin's "Origin of Species" in the Jul 1860 "Quarterly Review," is presented. The review was written by Darwin's nemesis Samuel Wilberforce, who was soon debunked by T. H. Huxley in a famous debate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0712</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NAHIBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Natural History Magazine, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological research ; Darwin, Charles (1809-1882) ; Evolution ; Evolution (Biology) ; History ; Human evolution ; Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825-1895) ; Methods ; Religion ; Religious aspects ; Science ; Science history ; Wilberforce, Samuel</subject><ispartof>Natural history, 1986-04, Vol.95 (4), p.16-16</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Museum of Natural History Apr 1986</rights><rights>Copyright Natural History Magazine, Inc. Apr 1986</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, Stephen Jay</creatorcontrib><title>Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)</title><title>Natural history</title><addtitle>Natural History</addtitle><description>A discussion of an anonymous review of Darwin's "Origin of Species" in the Jul 1860 "Quarterly Review," is presented. The review was written by Darwin's nemesis Samuel Wilberforce, who was soon debunked by T. H. Huxley in a famous debate.</description><subject>Biological research</subject><subject>Darwin, Charles (1809-1882)</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution (Biology)</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Human evolution</subject><subject>Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825-1895)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science history</subject><subject>Wilberforce, Samuel</subject><issn>0028-0712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0D1PwzAQBuAMIFEK_8ETBaEg-5ycnbGE8iEVdSiIMXJcJzVy4xKnAv49RmUGbjm9rx7dcAfJiFKQKRUMjpLjEF5pnJyzUfK49Gr7SZZqMwnE-dbqK3J-bcPab7_LnXHkxbra9I3vtYlG93aw2oZNIL4h5Vr1zgRyo_p3212cJIeNcsGc_uxx8nw7eyrv0_ni7qGcztOWIfBUYl1IU9dcSVFQyBBlzmkmJNCMFgDaMNQrjLFBtVphrTRgI7TgGmICPk7O9ne3vX_bmTBUGxu0cU51xu9CxREyoMj_BSkCi3DyKwRGkeWigD8lKyTmVAgR5eVetsqZynbad4P5GLR3zrSmih8pF9U0Y1IWiPwLAgt_fQ</recordid><startdate>19860401</startdate><enddate>19860401</enddate><creator>Gould, Stephen Jay</creator><general>Natural History Magazine, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860401</creationdate><title>Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)</title><author>Gould, Stephen Jay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1623-86b98ebb3a8790246685304782040922ce16cd6820f6add6bac26f7c73c2d6b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Biological research</topic><topic>Darwin, Charles (1809-1882)</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution (Biology)</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Human evolution</topic><topic>Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825-1895)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science history</topic><topic>Wilberforce, Samuel</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, Stephen Jay</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Natural history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, Stephen Jay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)</atitle><jtitle>Natural history</jtitle><addtitle>Natural History</addtitle><date>1986-04-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><issn>0028-0712</issn><coden>NAHIBZ</coden><abstract>A discussion of an anonymous review of Darwin's "Origin of Species" in the Jul 1860 "Quarterly Review," is presented. The review was written by Darwin's nemesis Samuel Wilberforce, who was soon debunked by T. H. Huxley in a famous debate.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Natural History Magazine, Inc</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0712
ispartof Natural history, 1986-04, Vol.95 (4), p.16-16
issn 0028-0712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36242063
source American Museum of Natural History Research Library
subjects Biological research
Darwin, Charles (1809-1882)
Evolution
Evolution (Biology)
History
Human evolution
Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825-1895)
Methods
Religion
Religious aspects
Science
Science history
Wilberforce, Samuel
title Soapy Sam's logic. (Bishop Samuel Wilberforce's criticisms of Charles Darwin)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A13%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soapy%20Sam's%20logic.%20(Bishop%20Samuel%20Wilberforce's%20criticisms%20of%20Charles%20Darwin)&rft.jtitle=Natural%20history&rft.au=Gould,%20Stephen%20Jay&rft.date=1986-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.issn=0028-0712&rft.coden=NAHIBZ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA4188966%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198650777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A4188966&rfr_iscdi=true