One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?

The concept of having only one standard and one mark might seem like the Holy Grail for many specification writers. Given the surge in market globalization over the past decade, there is a growing desire to harmonize the array of standards and facilitate cooperative recognition among testing agencie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Construction specifier 2008-12, Vol.61 (12), p.18-20
1. Verfasser: Griffiths, Jeff
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 12
container_start_page 18
container_title The Construction specifier
container_volume 61
creator Griffiths, Jeff
description The concept of having only one standard and one mark might seem like the Holy Grail for many specification writers. Given the surge in market globalization over the past decade, there is a growing desire to harmonize the array of standards and facilitate cooperative recognition among testing agencies. This is increasingly becoming a goal whether one is a design professional trying to specify a building product or a manufacturer trying to produce one. The question remains as to whether simplification and uniformity truly benefit design/construction professionals, manufacturers, and end-users. The answer may be revealed by reviewing what the industry is up against in the quest for uniformity, what has been accomplished, and what still needs to be done.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35992929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35992929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_359929293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA00DWzNDLlYOAqLs4yMDAzNbM04WTQ889LVQjPL8pJ0dNTCM-oVPDLL1EAiQWXJOalJBalKAApsIBvYlG2PQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlBzcw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPzSxOTs3JScxLzS8tjjc2tbQ0AkJjohUCABC-MzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>35992929</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Griffiths, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of having only one standard and one mark might seem like the Holy Grail for many specification writers. Given the surge in market globalization over the past decade, there is a growing desire to harmonize the array of standards and facilitate cooperative recognition among testing agencies. This is increasingly becoming a goal whether one is a design professional trying to specify a building product or a manufacturer trying to produce one. The question remains as to whether simplification and uniformity truly benefit design/construction professionals, manufacturers, and end-users. The answer may be revealed by reviewing what the industry is up against in the quest for uniformity, what has been accomplished, and what still needs to be done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-6925</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Construction specifier, 2008-12, Vol.61 (12), p.18-20</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?</title><title>The Construction specifier</title><description>The concept of having only one standard and one mark might seem like the Holy Grail for many specification writers. Given the surge in market globalization over the past decade, there is a growing desire to harmonize the array of standards and facilitate cooperative recognition among testing agencies. This is increasingly becoming a goal whether one is a design professional trying to specify a building product or a manufacturer trying to produce one. The question remains as to whether simplification and uniformity truly benefit design/construction professionals, manufacturers, and end-users. The answer may be revealed by reviewing what the industry is up against in the quest for uniformity, what has been accomplished, and what still needs to be done.</description><issn>0010-6925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA00DWzNDLlYOAqLs4yMDAzNbM04WTQ889LVQjPL8pJ0dNTCM-oVPDLL1EAiQWXJOalJBalKAApsIBvYlG2PQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlBzcw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPzSxOTs3JScxLzS8tjjc2tbQ0AkJjohUCABC-MzM</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Griffiths, Jeff</creator><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?</title><author>Griffiths, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_359929293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Construction specifier</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffiths, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?</atitle><jtitle>The Construction specifier</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>18-20</pages><issn>0010-6925</issn><abstract>The concept of having only one standard and one mark might seem like the Holy Grail for many specification writers. Given the surge in market globalization over the past decade, there is a growing desire to harmonize the array of standards and facilitate cooperative recognition among testing agencies. This is increasingly becoming a goal whether one is a design professional trying to specify a building product or a manufacturer trying to produce one. The question remains as to whether simplification and uniformity truly benefit design/construction professionals, manufacturers, and end-users. The answer may be revealed by reviewing what the industry is up against in the quest for uniformity, what has been accomplished, and what still needs to be done.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-6925
ispartof The Construction specifier, 2008-12, Vol.61 (12), p.18-20
issn 0010-6925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35992929
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title One World.. Why Not One Standard and One Mark?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20World..%20Why%20Not%20One%20Standard%20and%20One%20Mark?&rft.jtitle=The%20Construction%20specifier&rft.au=Griffiths,%20Jeff&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=18-20&rft.issn=0010-6925&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E35992929%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35992929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true