Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis

The relationship between the financial structure of a marketing cooperative (MC) and the requirement of the domination of control by the members is analysed from a transaction costs perspective. A MC receives less favourable terms on outside equity than a conventional firm because the decision power...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural economics 2001, Vol.26 (3), p.205-216
Hauptverfasser: Hendrikse, George W.J., Veerman, Cees P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue 3
container_start_page 205
container_title Agricultural economics
container_volume 26
creator Hendrikse, George W.J.
Veerman, Cees P.
description The relationship between the financial structure of a marketing cooperative (MC) and the requirement of the domination of control by the members is analysed from a transaction costs perspective. A MC receives less favourable terms on outside equity than a conventional firm because the decision power regarding new investments is not allocated to the providers of these funds. This is a serious threat to the survival of a MC in a market where efficient investments are characterised by an increasing level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production. A MC is predicted to be an efficient organisational form when the level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production is at a low or immediate level compared to the level of asset specificity at the farming stage of production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00122-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_elsev</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35935558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169515000001225</els_id><sourcerecordid>35935558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e2025-c9b369c40192b2514c81dd51ac706fd6761952c7c7cf640eccd136d7c8d66e4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFd_gtCT6KGapE3aehFZ_IIVD35cQ3YylWg3WZN0wX9v64rMMHN53mF4CDlm9JxRJi-ex9EWggl6SukZpYzzQuyQjIm6Kmgj-S7J_pF9chDjxwhVlJcZeXvU4ROTde85eL_GoJPdYMy1M3lnnXZgdZ_HFAZIQ8DLXOcpaBc1JOvdmIkp5gje-ZWFKab772jjIdnrdB_x6G_PyOvtzcv8vlg83T3MrxcFcspFAe2ylC1UlLV8yQWroGHGCKahprIzspasFRzqsTpZUQQwrJSmhsZIiRWUM3KyvbsO_mvAmNTKRsC-1w79EFUp2lII0Yzg1RbE8ZuNxaAiWHSAxgaEpIy3ilE1-VS_PtUkS9GpR59KlD-KImqJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35935558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Hendrikse, George W.J. ; Veerman, Cees P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendrikse, George W.J. ; Veerman, Cees P.</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between the financial structure of a marketing cooperative (MC) and the requirement of the domination of control by the members is analysed from a transaction costs perspective. A MC receives less favourable terms on outside equity than a conventional firm because the decision power regarding new investments is not allocated to the providers of these funds. This is a serious threat to the survival of a MC in a market where efficient investments are characterised by an increasing level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production. A MC is predicted to be an efficient organisational form when the level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production is at a low or immediate level compared to the level of asset specificity at the farming stage of production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-0862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00122-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Financial structure ; Marketing cooperative ; Transaction costs</subject><ispartof>Agricultural economics, 2001, Vol.26 (3), p.205-216</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendrikse, George W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veerman, Cees P.</creatorcontrib><title>Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis</title><title>Agricultural economics</title><description>The relationship between the financial structure of a marketing cooperative (MC) and the requirement of the domination of control by the members is analysed from a transaction costs perspective. A MC receives less favourable terms on outside equity than a conventional firm because the decision power regarding new investments is not allocated to the providers of these funds. This is a serious threat to the survival of a MC in a market where efficient investments are characterised by an increasing level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production. A MC is predicted to be an efficient organisational form when the level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production is at a low or immediate level compared to the level of asset specificity at the farming stage of production.</description><subject>Financial structure</subject><subject>Marketing cooperative</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><issn>0169-5150</issn><issn>1574-0862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFd_gtCT6KGapE3aehFZ_IIVD35cQ3YylWg3WZN0wX9v64rMMHN53mF4CDlm9JxRJi-ex9EWggl6SukZpYzzQuyQjIm6Kmgj-S7J_pF9chDjxwhVlJcZeXvU4ROTde85eL_GoJPdYMy1M3lnnXZgdZ_HFAZIQ8DLXOcpaBc1JOvdmIkp5gje-ZWFKab772jjIdnrdB_x6G_PyOvtzcv8vlg83T3MrxcFcspFAe2ylC1UlLV8yQWroGHGCKahprIzspasFRzqsTpZUQQwrJSmhsZIiRWUM3KyvbsO_mvAmNTKRsC-1w79EFUp2lII0Yzg1RbE8ZuNxaAiWHSAxgaEpIy3ilE1-VS_PtUkS9GpR59KlD-KImqJ</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Hendrikse, George W.J.</creator><creator>Veerman, Cees P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis</title><author>Hendrikse, George W.J. ; Veerman, Cees P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e2025-c9b369c40192b2514c81dd51ac706fd6761952c7c7cf640eccd136d7c8d66e4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Financial structure</topic><topic>Marketing cooperative</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendrikse, George W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veerman, Cees P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendrikse, George W.J.</au><au>Veerman, Cees P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>205-216</pages><issn>0169-5150</issn><eissn>1574-0862</eissn><abstract>The relationship between the financial structure of a marketing cooperative (MC) and the requirement of the domination of control by the members is analysed from a transaction costs perspective. A MC receives less favourable terms on outside equity than a conventional firm because the decision power regarding new investments is not allocated to the providers of these funds. This is a serious threat to the survival of a MC in a market where efficient investments are characterised by an increasing level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production. A MC is predicted to be an efficient organisational form when the level of asset specificity at the processing stage of production is at a low or immediate level compared to the level of asset specificity at the farming stage of production.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00122-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5150
ispartof Agricultural economics, 2001, Vol.26 (3), p.205-216
issn 0169-5150
1574-0862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35935558
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Financial structure
Marketing cooperative
Transaction costs
title Marketing cooperatives and financial structure: a transaction costs economics analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_elsev&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marketing%20cooperatives%20and%20financial%20structure:%20a%20transaction%20costs%20economics%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Hendrikse,%20George%20W.J.&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=205-216&rft.issn=0169-5150&rft.eissn=1574-0862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00122-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_elsev%3E35935558%3C/proquest_elsev%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35935558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169515000001225&rfr_iscdi=true