Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence

This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, whic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacific accounting review 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59
Hauptverfasser: LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI, Hay, David, Weil, Sidney
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27
container_title Pacific accounting review
container_volume 12
creator LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI
Hay, David
Weil, Sidney
description This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/eb037948
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35924435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35924435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQAOAgCq4P8CcEBfVSzaRJH97WRddF0WVRBC8hTaZQ3W1r0qr77-1S9aCe5jDfPAnZA3YCwJJTzFgYpyJZIwPOBARSpGKdDBiACJhM-CbZ8v6ZMegSfECuLyuHRvuGDo1pnTZLqktLzwvtaVHSyfSOTl3lazRN69Gf0RkaLBt6i-_0CfV8hS_eCoulwR2ykeu5x92vuE0eLi_uR1fBzd14MhreBIanSRMkVsYWuMxkmGd5pEVkbWRFGiYMM8NjzSSwSAotAAwkIrZcGgCwGTMGNIbb5LDvW7vqtUXfqEXhDc67ZbBqvQplyoUIZQf3f8HnqnVlt5uCVEiQqYw6dNwj093pHeaqdsVCu6UCplYvVd8v7WjQ08I3-PHjtHtRURzGUolHruQomUazeKxW8w96jwt0em5_Kr47qtrmnTr6X_2Z_wntsY4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194515956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</creator><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-0582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-5494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb037948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palmerston North: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Corporate profits ; Earnings forecasting ; Financial reporting ; Hypotheses ; Hypothesis testing ; Initial public offerings ; Legislation ; Liability ; Litigation ; Prospecti ; Regression analysis ; Securities regulations ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Pacific accounting review, 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Pacific Accounting Review Trust % Massey University, Dept of Accountancy and Business Law Jun 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb037948/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb037948/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52664,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><title>Pacific accounting review</title><description>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Earnings forecasting</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Prospecti</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Securities regulations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0114-0582</issn><issn>2041-5494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQAOAgCq4P8CcEBfVSzaRJH97WRddF0WVRBC8hTaZQ3W1r0qr77-1S9aCe5jDfPAnZA3YCwJJTzFgYpyJZIwPOBARSpGKdDBiACJhM-CbZ8v6ZMegSfECuLyuHRvuGDo1pnTZLqktLzwvtaVHSyfSOTl3lazRN69Gf0RkaLBt6i-_0CfV8hS_eCoulwR2ykeu5x92vuE0eLi_uR1fBzd14MhreBIanSRMkVsYWuMxkmGd5pEVkbWRFGiYMM8NjzSSwSAotAAwkIrZcGgCwGTMGNIbb5LDvW7vqtUXfqEXhDc67ZbBqvQplyoUIZQf3f8HnqnVlt5uCVEiQqYw6dNwj093pHeaqdsVCu6UCplYvVd8v7WjQ08I3-PHjtHtRURzGUolHruQomUazeKxW8w96jwt0em5_Kr47qtrmnTr6X_2Z_wntsY4Q</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creator><creator>Hay, David</creator><creator>Weil, Sidney</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><author>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Earnings forecasting</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Prospecti</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Securities regulations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Pacific accounting review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</au><au>Hay, David</au><au>Weil, Sidney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Pacific accounting review</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>27-59</pages><issn>0114-0582</issn><eissn>2041-5494</eissn><abstract>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</abstract><cop>Palmerston North</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb037948</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0114-0582
ispartof Pacific accounting review, 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59
issn 0114-0582
2041-5494
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35924435
source Emerald Journals
subjects Accuracy
Bias
Corporate profits
Earnings forecasting
Financial reporting
Hypotheses
Hypothesis testing
Initial public offerings
Legislation
Liability
Litigation
Prospecti
Regression analysis
Securities regulations
Studies
title Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forecast%20Accuracy%20and%20Bias%20in%20IPO%20Prospectuses:%20Recent%20New%20Zealand%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20accounting%20review&rft.au=LYDIA%20HSU,%20WEN-HSI&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=27-59&rft.issn=0114-0582&rft.eissn=2041-5494&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb037948&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E35924435%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194515956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true