Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence
This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, whic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacific accounting review 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Pacific accounting review |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI Hay, David Weil, Sidney |
description | This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/eb037948 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35924435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35924435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQAOAgCq4P8CcEBfVSzaRJH97WRddF0WVRBC8hTaZQ3W1r0qr77-1S9aCe5jDfPAnZA3YCwJJTzFgYpyJZIwPOBARSpGKdDBiACJhM-CbZ8v6ZMegSfECuLyuHRvuGDo1pnTZLqktLzwvtaVHSyfSOTl3lazRN69Gf0RkaLBt6i-_0CfV8hS_eCoulwR2ykeu5x92vuE0eLi_uR1fBzd14MhreBIanSRMkVsYWuMxkmGd5pEVkbWRFGiYMM8NjzSSwSAotAAwkIrZcGgCwGTMGNIbb5LDvW7vqtUXfqEXhDc67ZbBqvQplyoUIZQf3f8HnqnVlt5uCVEiQqYw6dNwj093pHeaqdsVCu6UCplYvVd8v7WjQ08I3-PHjtHtRURzGUolHruQomUazeKxW8w96jwt0em5_Kr47qtrmnTr6X_2Z_wntsY4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194515956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</creator><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-0582</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-5494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb037948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palmerston North: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Corporate profits ; Earnings forecasting ; Financial reporting ; Hypotheses ; Hypothesis testing ; Initial public offerings ; Legislation ; Liability ; Litigation ; Prospecti ; Regression analysis ; Securities regulations ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Pacific accounting review, 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Pacific Accounting Review Trust % Massey University, Dept of Accountancy and Business Law Jun 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb037948/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb037948/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52664,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><title>Pacific accounting review</title><description>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Earnings forecasting</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Prospecti</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Securities regulations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0114-0582</issn><issn>2041-5494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQAOAgCq4P8CcEBfVSzaRJH97WRddF0WVRBC8hTaZQ3W1r0qr77-1S9aCe5jDfPAnZA3YCwJJTzFgYpyJZIwPOBARSpGKdDBiACJhM-CbZ8v6ZMegSfECuLyuHRvuGDo1pnTZLqktLzwvtaVHSyfSOTl3lazRN69Gf0RkaLBt6i-_0CfV8hS_eCoulwR2ykeu5x92vuE0eLi_uR1fBzd14MhreBIanSRMkVsYWuMxkmGd5pEVkbWRFGiYMM8NjzSSwSAotAAwkIrZcGgCwGTMGNIbb5LDvW7vqtUXfqEXhDc67ZbBqvQplyoUIZQf3f8HnqnVlt5uCVEiQqYw6dNwj093pHeaqdsVCu6UCplYvVd8v7WjQ08I3-PHjtHtRURzGUolHruQomUazeKxW8w96jwt0em5_Kr47qtrmnTr6X_2Z_wntsY4Q</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creator><creator>Hay, David</creator><creator>Weil, Sidney</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</title><author>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI ; Hay, David ; Weil, Sidney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-8d57d125b53fbf6a46dd6d49380ebc27a0510654a411c1847d25c111db0cc1ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Earnings forecasting</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Prospecti</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Securities regulations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, Sidney</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Pacific accounting review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LYDIA HSU, WEN-HSI</au><au>Hay, David</au><au>Weil, Sidney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Pacific accounting review</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>27-59</pages><issn>0114-0582</issn><eissn>2041-5494</eissn><abstract>This study examines the accuracy and bias of profit forecasts disclosed in prospectuses by New Zealand companies for initial public offerings during the period 1987 to 1994. The results show that profit forecasts in this period are, on average, more accurate titan those disclosed prior to 1987, which were examined in prior studies. However, the results reject the null hypothesis that profit forecasts are accurate. In examining forecast bias, the evidence shows that the forecasts are, on average, somewhat pessimistic, but not sufficiently to reject the hypothesis that profit forecasts are unbiased. Tests of the determinants of error show that larger companies make more accurate forecasts, and forecasts made in the year 1987 are less accurate than in other years. Tests of the determinants of bias show that forecasts made in 1987 are also more optimistic, and that companies with longer trading histories and pessimistic forecasts make less biased forecasts. Forecast period and industry type are not significantly related to error or bias.</abstract><cop>Palmerston North</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb037948</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0114-0582 |
ispartof | Pacific accounting review, 2000-01, Vol.12 (1), p.27-59 |
issn | 0114-0582 2041-5494 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35924435 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Bias Corporate profits Earnings forecasting Financial reporting Hypotheses Hypothesis testing Initial public offerings Legislation Liability Litigation Prospecti Regression analysis Securities regulations Studies |
title | Forecast Accuracy and Bias in IPO Prospectuses: Recent New Zealand Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forecast%20Accuracy%20and%20Bias%20in%20IPO%20Prospectuses:%20Recent%20New%20Zealand%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20accounting%20review&rft.au=LYDIA%20HSU,%20WEN-HSI&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=27-59&rft.issn=0114-0582&rft.eissn=2041-5494&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb037948&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E35924435%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194515956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |