Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments

Detectable warnings are standardized tactile walking surfaces located at the end of curb ramps and train platforms to identify the potential hazard. A study was conducted to determine which detectable warning colors and patterns are visually detectable and conspicuous to pedestrians with visual impa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2008-01, Vol.2073 (1), p.104-113
Hauptverfasser: Jenness, James W., Singer, Jeremiah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2073
creator Jenness, James W.
Singer, Jeremiah
description Detectable warnings are standardized tactile walking surfaces located at the end of curb ramps and train platforms to identify the potential hazard. A study was conducted to determine which detectable warning colors and patterns are visually detectable and conspicuous to pedestrians with visual impairments and to provide recommendations related to color, pattern, and contrast of detectable warnings for placement on sidewalks. Fifty individuals with low vision viewed each of 13 detectable warnings individually on four different types of simulated sidewalk. The set of detectable warnings included both solid colors and black-and-white patterns. The outcomes of interest were visual detection distance, participants’ descriptions of detectable warning colors, and participants’ ratings of each detectable warning's conspicuity against a particular simulated sidewalk. Detection distance results indicate that pedestrians with visual impairments were able to see most combinations of detectable warning and sidewalk from 8 ft away, but fewer were able to see them at greater distances. Detectable warnings that were similar in color to the sidewalk were seen by few participants, indicating that visual cues provided by the truncated-dome texture itself are not sufficient to ensure visual detection. The luminance contrast between the detectable warning and the sidewalk was an important factor for predicting the likelihood that a detectable warning would be seen. Besides luminance contrast, regression analyses indicated that some other characteristics of detectable warnings were generally associated with high detection rates and high conspicuity ratings, including color (reds and yellows rather than achromatic) and reflectance (lighter colors rather than darker colors). Additional recommendations for detectable warning visual characteristics are provided.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/2073-12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35714938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3141_2073-12</sage_id><sourcerecordid>35714938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-700bec42a193838b029c9cab7c3797a8f44c776738ab6a1253a434eb0456e093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMPcBwH_0IWoqtqXm2apYyvgQFdDIqrcJtJxwxtWpMWmX9vS925ulz4-DjnIHRJyS2ngt4xInlC2RGaMZqpRJCUHaOFkjnhRBHFc0pP0IzwjCZU5fQMnce4J4RzIfkMfb676ApXue6AwW_xsvGxdaYf_6bED7azpoOisvgDgnd-F3HZBPxmtzZ2wYGP-Md1X3jQ9FDhVd2CC7X1XbxApyVU0S7-7hxtnh43y5dk_fq8Wt6vE8OF6BJJSGGNYECHqDwvCFNGGSik4VJJyEshjJSZ5DkUGVCWchBc2IKINLNDvTm6nrRtaL77IZSuXTS2qsDbpo-ap5KKUT1HNxNoQhNjsKVug6shHDQlelxSj0tqygbyaiIj7KzeN33wQ4F_2C_7sG4q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35714938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Jenness, James W. ; Singer, Jeremiah</creator><creatorcontrib>Jenness, James W. ; Singer, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><description>Detectable warnings are standardized tactile walking surfaces located at the end of curb ramps and train platforms to identify the potential hazard. A study was conducted to determine which detectable warning colors and patterns are visually detectable and conspicuous to pedestrians with visual impairments and to provide recommendations related to color, pattern, and contrast of detectable warnings for placement on sidewalks. Fifty individuals with low vision viewed each of 13 detectable warnings individually on four different types of simulated sidewalk. The set of detectable warnings included both solid colors and black-and-white patterns. The outcomes of interest were visual detection distance, participants’ descriptions of detectable warning colors, and participants’ ratings of each detectable warning's conspicuity against a particular simulated sidewalk. Detection distance results indicate that pedestrians with visual impairments were able to see most combinations of detectable warning and sidewalk from 8 ft away, but fewer were able to see them at greater distances. Detectable warnings that were similar in color to the sidewalk were seen by few participants, indicating that visual cues provided by the truncated-dome texture itself are not sufficient to ensure visual detection. The luminance contrast between the detectable warning and the sidewalk was an important factor for predicting the likelihood that a detectable warning would be seen. Besides luminance contrast, regression analyses indicated that some other characteristics of detectable warnings were generally associated with high detection rates and high conspicuity ratings, including color (reds and yellows rather than achromatic) and reflectance (lighter colors rather than darker colors). Additional recommendations for detectable warning visual characteristics are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780309093811</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0309093813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/2073-12</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2008-01, Vol.2073 (1), p.104-113</ispartof><rights>2008 National Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-700bec42a193838b029c9cab7c3797a8f44c776738ab6a1253a434eb0456e093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-700bec42a193838b029c9cab7c3797a8f44c776738ab6a1253a434eb0456e093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3141/2073-12$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2073-12$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jenness, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><title>Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Detectable warnings are standardized tactile walking surfaces located at the end of curb ramps and train platforms to identify the potential hazard. A study was conducted to determine which detectable warning colors and patterns are visually detectable and conspicuous to pedestrians with visual impairments and to provide recommendations related to color, pattern, and contrast of detectable warnings for placement on sidewalks. Fifty individuals with low vision viewed each of 13 detectable warnings individually on four different types of simulated sidewalk. The set of detectable warnings included both solid colors and black-and-white patterns. The outcomes of interest were visual detection distance, participants’ descriptions of detectable warning colors, and participants’ ratings of each detectable warning's conspicuity against a particular simulated sidewalk. Detection distance results indicate that pedestrians with visual impairments were able to see most combinations of detectable warning and sidewalk from 8 ft away, but fewer were able to see them at greater distances. Detectable warnings that were similar in color to the sidewalk were seen by few participants, indicating that visual cues provided by the truncated-dome texture itself are not sufficient to ensure visual detection. The luminance contrast between the detectable warning and the sidewalk was an important factor for predicting the likelihood that a detectable warning would be seen. Besides luminance contrast, regression analyses indicated that some other characteristics of detectable warnings were generally associated with high detection rates and high conspicuity ratings, including color (reds and yellows rather than achromatic) and reflectance (lighter colors rather than darker colors). Additional recommendations for detectable warning visual characteristics are provided.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><isbn>9780309093811</isbn><isbn>0309093813</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMPcBwH_0IWoqtqXm2apYyvgQFdDIqrcJtJxwxtWpMWmX9vS925ulz4-DjnIHRJyS2ngt4xInlC2RGaMZqpRJCUHaOFkjnhRBHFc0pP0IzwjCZU5fQMnce4J4RzIfkMfb676ApXue6AwW_xsvGxdaYf_6bED7azpoOisvgDgnd-F3HZBPxmtzZ2wYGP-Md1X3jQ9FDhVd2CC7X1XbxApyVU0S7-7hxtnh43y5dk_fq8Wt6vE8OF6BJJSGGNYECHqDwvCFNGGSik4VJJyEshjJSZ5DkUGVCWchBc2IKINLNDvTm6nrRtaL77IZSuXTS2qsDbpo-ap5KKUT1HNxNoQhNjsKVug6shHDQlelxSj0tqygbyaiIj7KzeN33wQ4F_2C_7sG4q</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Jenness, James W.</creator><creator>Singer, Jeremiah</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments</title><author>Jenness, James W. ; Singer, Jeremiah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-700bec42a193838b029c9cab7c3797a8f44c776738ab6a1253a434eb0456e093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jenness, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jenness, James W.</au><au>Singer, Jeremiah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2073</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>104-113</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><isbn>9780309093811</isbn><isbn>0309093813</isbn><abstract>Detectable warnings are standardized tactile walking surfaces located at the end of curb ramps and train platforms to identify the potential hazard. A study was conducted to determine which detectable warning colors and patterns are visually detectable and conspicuous to pedestrians with visual impairments and to provide recommendations related to color, pattern, and contrast of detectable warnings for placement on sidewalks. Fifty individuals with low vision viewed each of 13 detectable warnings individually on four different types of simulated sidewalk. The set of detectable warnings included both solid colors and black-and-white patterns. The outcomes of interest were visual detection distance, participants’ descriptions of detectable warning colors, and participants’ ratings of each detectable warning's conspicuity against a particular simulated sidewalk. Detection distance results indicate that pedestrians with visual impairments were able to see most combinations of detectable warning and sidewalk from 8 ft away, but fewer were able to see them at greater distances. Detectable warnings that were similar in color to the sidewalk were seen by few participants, indicating that visual cues provided by the truncated-dome texture itself are not sufficient to ensure visual detection. The luminance contrast between the detectable warning and the sidewalk was an important factor for predicting the likelihood that a detectable warning would be seen. Besides luminance contrast, regression analyses indicated that some other characteristics of detectable warnings were generally associated with high detection rates and high conspicuity ratings, including color (reds and yellows rather than achromatic) and reflectance (lighter colors rather than darker colors). Additional recommendations for detectable warning visual characteristics are provided.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3141/2073-12</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2008-01, Vol.2073 (1), p.104-113
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35714938
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Visibility and Conspicuity of Detectable Warnings for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A52%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visibility%20and%20Conspicuity%20of%20Detectable%20Warnings%20for%20Pedestrians%20with%20Visual%20Impairments&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Jenness,%20James%20W.&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=2073&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=104-113&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft.isbn=9780309093811&rft.isbn_list=0309093813&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/2073-12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35714938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35714938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3141_2073-12&rfr_iscdi=true