Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration

Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721
Hauptverfasser: Snyder, R. L, Spano, D, Duce, P, Paw U, K. T, Rivera, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 721
container_issue 6
container_start_page 716
container_title Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering
container_volume 134
creator Snyder, R. L
Spano, D
Duce, P
Paw U, K. T
Rivera, M
description Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration ( ETc ) over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration ( ET0 ) for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient Kc =1.00 is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture ETc . In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration ( ETa ) from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of Ks = ETa ∕ ET0 ≈0.90 was observed during the high ET period ( ET0 >7 mm day−1 ) from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the Ks =1.0 . Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using ET0 from Twitchell Island, a Kc =1.00 , and Ks =1.00 will provide good estimates of ETa during low to moderate ET periods and Ks ≈0.90 should be used when ET0 >7.0 mm day−1 . In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure ETa .
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35696112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35696112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wd6o20U1H22SeiGMMT9goDh3HU6zRDq6diat4r83tWOXenUg5-E9bx6Ergi-JpiTm9FkMZ2NsWAszhImRhRjOSYsueUjQfj4AA1IeI8TIZJDNNhzx-jE-zXGJBEYD5BctM6CNtGrqcwXlNHMN8UGmqKuotpGL-Cb1plo9gnbunFQ-W3hfren6MhC6c3Zbg7R8n72Nn2M588PT9PJPIZwrImN5hyvBORptqI8lakO5fIUJMlzy1hOVxJ4ThOqDaGhk9BS8iTHOQW7sqlkQ3TZ525d_dEa36hN4bUpS6hM3XrFUp5xQui_IMlEKMC7xLse1K723hmrti582X0rglWnVqlOreqUqU6Z6tSqoFZxFdqHgIvdJfAaShu06MLvUyjOiJAiDdx5z1moFby7wCwXFBOGCQ-JQgTitidCkFHrunVVcLnv8XeNHz6DlD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19726568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration ( ETc ) over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration ( ET0 ) for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient Kc =1.00 is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture ETc . In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration ( ETa ) from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of Ks = ETa ∕ ET0 ≈0.90 was observed during the high ET period ( ET0 &gt;7 mm day−1 ) from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the Ks =1.0 . Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using ET0 from Twitchell Island, a Kc =1.00 , and Ks =1.00 will provide good estimates of ETa during low to moderate ET periods and Ks ≈0.90 should be used when ET0 &gt;7.0 mm day−1 . In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure ETa .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDEDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; canopy ; cost effectiveness ; estimation ; evapotranspiration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; irrigation ; irrigation management ; Irrigation. Drainage ; pastures ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,75942,75950</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20917875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spano, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duce, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paw U, K. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration ( ETc ) over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration ( ET0 ) for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient Kc =1.00 is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture ETc . In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration ( ETa ) from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of Ks = ETa ∕ ET0 ≈0.90 was observed during the high ET period ( ET0 &gt;7 mm day−1 ) from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the Ks =1.0 . Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using ET0 from Twitchell Island, a Kc =1.00 , and Ks =1.00 will provide good estimates of ETa during low to moderate ET periods and Ks ≈0.90 should be used when ET0 &gt;7.0 mm day−1 . In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure ETa .</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>irrigation management</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><issn>0733-9437</issn><issn>1943-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wd6o20U1H22SeiGMMT9goDh3HU6zRDq6diat4r83tWOXenUg5-E9bx6Ergi-JpiTm9FkMZ2NsWAszhImRhRjOSYsueUjQfj4AA1IeI8TIZJDNNhzx-jE-zXGJBEYD5BctM6CNtGrqcwXlNHMN8UGmqKuotpGL-Cb1plo9gnbunFQ-W3hfren6MhC6c3Zbg7R8n72Nn2M588PT9PJPIZwrImN5hyvBORptqI8lakO5fIUJMlzy1hOVxJ4ThOqDaGhk9BS8iTHOQW7sqlkQ3TZ525d_dEa36hN4bUpS6hM3XrFUp5xQui_IMlEKMC7xLse1K723hmrti582X0rglWnVqlOreqUqU6Z6tSqoFZxFdqHgIvdJfAaShu06MLvUyjOiJAiDdx5z1moFby7wCwXFBOGCQ-JQgTitidCkFHrunVVcLnv8XeNHz6DlD4</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Snyder, R. L</creator><creator>Spano, D</creator><creator>Duce, P</creator><creator>Paw U, K. T</creator><creator>Rivera, M</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><author>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>irrigation management</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spano, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duce, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paw U, K. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, R. L</au><au>Spano, D</au><au>Duce, P</au><au>Paw U, K. T</au><au>Rivera, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>716-721</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><eissn>1943-4774</eissn><coden>JIDEDH</coden><abstract>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration ( ETc ) over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration ( ET0 ) for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient Kc =1.00 is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture ETc . In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration ( ETa ) from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of Ks = ETa ∕ ET0 ≈0.90 was observed during the high ET period ( ET0 &gt;7 mm day−1 ) from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the Ks =1.0 . Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using ET0 from Twitchell Island, a Kc =1.00 , and Ks =1.00 will provide good estimates of ETa during low to moderate ET periods and Ks ≈0.90 should be used when ET0 &gt;7.0 mm day−1 . In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure ETa .</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9437
ispartof Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721
issn 0733-9437
1943-4774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35696112
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agricultural and forest meteorology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
canopy
cost effectiveness
estimation
evapotranspiration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
irrigation
irrigation management
Irrigation. Drainage
pastures
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration
title Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20Renewal%20Estimation%20of%20Pasture%20Evapotranspiration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Snyder,%20R.%20L&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=716-721&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft.eissn=1943-4774&rft.coden=JIDEDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35696112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19726568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true