Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration
Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 721 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 716 |
container_title | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Snyder, R. L Spano, D Duce, P Paw U, K. T Rivera, M |
description | Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration
(
ETc
)
over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration
(
ET0
)
for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient
Kc
=1.00
is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture
ETc
. In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration
(
ETa
)
from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of
Ks
=
ETa
∕
ET0
≈0.90
was observed during the high ET period
(
ET0
>7
mm
day−1
)
from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the
Ks
=1.0
. Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using
ET0
from Twitchell Island, a
Kc
=1.00
, and
Ks
=1.00
will provide good estimates of
ETa
during low to moderate ET periods and
Ks
≈0.90
should be used when
ET0
>7.0
mm
day−1
. In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure
ETa
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35696112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35696112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wd6o20U1H22SeiGMMT9goDh3HU6zRDq6diat4r83tWOXenUg5-E9bx6Ergi-JpiTm9FkMZ2NsWAszhImRhRjOSYsueUjQfj4AA1IeI8TIZJDNNhzx-jE-zXGJBEYD5BctM6CNtGrqcwXlNHMN8UGmqKuotpGL-Cb1plo9gnbunFQ-W3hfren6MhC6c3Zbg7R8n72Nn2M588PT9PJPIZwrImN5hyvBORptqI8lakO5fIUJMlzy1hOVxJ4ThOqDaGhk9BS8iTHOQW7sqlkQ3TZ525d_dEa36hN4bUpS6hM3XrFUp5xQui_IMlEKMC7xLse1K723hmrti582X0rglWnVqlOreqUqU6Z6tSqoFZxFdqHgIvdJfAaShu06MLvUyjOiJAiDdx5z1moFby7wCwXFBOGCQ-JQgTitidCkFHrunVVcLnv8XeNHz6DlD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19726568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration
(
ETc
)
over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration
(
ET0
)
for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient
Kc
=1.00
is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture
ETc
. In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration
(
ETa
)
from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of
Ks
=
ETa
∕
ET0
≈0.90
was observed during the high ET period
(
ET0
>7
mm
day−1
)
from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the
Ks
=1.0
. Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using
ET0
from Twitchell Island, a
Kc
=1.00
, and
Ks
=1.00
will provide good estimates of
ETa
during low to moderate ET periods and
Ks
≈0.90
should be used when
ET0
>7.0
mm
day−1
. In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure
ETa
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDEDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; canopy ; cost effectiveness ; estimation ; evapotranspiration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; irrigation ; irrigation management ; Irrigation. Drainage ; pastures ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,75942,75950</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20917875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spano, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duce, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paw U, K. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration
(
ETc
)
over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration
(
ET0
)
for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient
Kc
=1.00
is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture
ETc
. In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration
(
ETa
)
from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of
Ks
=
ETa
∕
ET0
≈0.90
was observed during the high ET period
(
ET0
>7
mm
day−1
)
from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the
Ks
=1.0
. Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using
ET0
from Twitchell Island, a
Kc
=1.00
, and
Ks
=1.00
will provide good estimates of
ETa
during low to moderate ET periods and
Ks
≈0.90
should be used when
ET0
>7.0
mm
day−1
. In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure
ETa
.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>irrigation management</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><issn>0733-9437</issn><issn>1943-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wd6o20U1H22SeiGMMT9goDh3HU6zRDq6diat4r83tWOXenUg5-E9bx6Ergi-JpiTm9FkMZ2NsWAszhImRhRjOSYsueUjQfj4AA1IeI8TIZJDNNhzx-jE-zXGJBEYD5BctM6CNtGrqcwXlNHMN8UGmqKuotpGL-Cb1plo9gnbunFQ-W3hfren6MhC6c3Zbg7R8n72Nn2M588PT9PJPIZwrImN5hyvBORptqI8lakO5fIUJMlzy1hOVxJ4ThOqDaGhk9BS8iTHOQW7sqlkQ3TZ525d_dEa36hN4bUpS6hM3XrFUp5xQui_IMlEKMC7xLse1K723hmrti582X0rglWnVqlOreqUqU6Z6tSqoFZxFdqHgIvdJfAaShu06MLvUyjOiJAiDdx5z1moFby7wCwXFBOGCQ-JQgTitidCkFHrunVVcLnv8XeNHz6DlD4</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Snyder, R. L</creator><creator>Spano, D</creator><creator>Duce, P</creator><creator>Paw U, K. T</creator><creator>Rivera, M</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</title><author>Snyder, R. L ; Spano, D ; Duce, P ; Paw U, K. T ; Rivera, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-ec660d7ab59d26585c716b5a81bbf33b2d8a6b242ce121477c8864b0b2afdf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>irrigation management</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spano, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duce, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paw U, K. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, R. L</au><au>Spano, D</au><au>Duce, P</au><au>Paw U, K. T</au><au>Rivera, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>716-721</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><eissn>1943-4774</eissn><coden>JIDEDH</coden><abstract>Experiments to measure the evapotranspiration of an improved, irrigated pasture were conducted at the University of California, Davis, CA field station and over a commercial irrigated pasture on Twitchell Island in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta using the surface renewal (SR) method. In Davis, the SR method was used to determine well-watered crop evapotranspiration
(
ETc
)
over short grass, and the results were compared with the ASCE-EWRI standardized reference evapotranspiration
(
ET0
)
for a short canopy to establish that a crop coefficient
Kc
=1.00
is appropriate for estimating well-watered pasture
ETc
. In the Twitchell Island study, surface renewal was used to determine the actual evapotranspiration
(
ETa
)
from a commercial pasture. A stress coefficient of
Ks
=
ETa
∕
ET0
≈0.90
was observed during the high ET period
(
ET0
>7
mm
day−1
)
from about mid-June through mid-July for the Twitchell Island pasture. Otherwise, the pasture was mainly unstressed, so the
Ks
=1.0
. Thus, assuming no future changes in irrigation management, using
ET0
from Twitchell Island, a
Kc
=1.00
, and
Ks
=1.00
will provide good estimates of
ETa
during low to moderate ET periods and
Ks
≈0.90
should be used when
ET0
>7.0
mm
day−1
. In general, a thermocouple for SR measurements costs about $100, whereas the price for a sonic anemometer varies between $3,000 and $20,000, so the SR method provides a low-cost method to measure
ETa
.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9437 |
ispartof | Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2008-12, Vol.134 (6), p.716-721 |
issn | 0733-9437 1943-4774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35696112 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agricultural and forest meteorology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences canopy cost effectiveness estimation evapotranspiration Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production irrigation irrigation management Irrigation. Drainage pastures TECHNICAL PAPERS Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration |
title | Surface Renewal Estimation of Pasture Evapotranspiration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20Renewal%20Estimation%20of%20Pasture%20Evapotranspiration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Snyder,%20R.%20L&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=716-721&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft.eissn=1943-4774&rft.coden=JIDEDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:6(716)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35696112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19726568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |