Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams
Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Employee relations 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Employee relations |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Koster, Ferry Stokman, Frans Hodson, Randy Sanders, Karin |
description | Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/01425450710719978 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35637425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1177707101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMouFY_gHgpHrytziSbTXKU4j8oeLD3kN0kduu2qcku0m9vSj3pQRh4DPObGd4j5BLhFhHkHWBFecVBYC6lhDwiBQouSwG1OibFfl5mgJ-Ss5RWAHmLsYJcvYW-syZ2w246LGMY35fTjRu-QvxI5-TEmz65ix-dkMXjw2L2XM5fn15m9_OypYBDiVSgt8YKxwQDaFqrJJVGNthQYX3-aZipnad1Vit4RSuQVuSeK_CKTcjN4ew2hs_RpUGvu9S6vjcbF8akGa-ZyO7-BxEoqyTN4PUvcBXGuMkeNGUcJeWCZQgPUBtDStF5vY3d2sSdRtD7TPWfTNk3kcVmcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235182573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</creator><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01425450710719978</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMREDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cooperation ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Ethnography ; Organizational behavior ; Studies ; Teams ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Employee relations, 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokman, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><title>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</title><title>Employee relations</title><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0142-5455</issn><issn>1758-7069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMouFY_gHgpHrytziSbTXKU4j8oeLD3kN0kduu2qcku0m9vSj3pQRh4DPObGd4j5BLhFhHkHWBFecVBYC6lhDwiBQouSwG1OibFfl5mgJ-Ss5RWAHmLsYJcvYW-syZ2w246LGMY35fTjRu-QvxI5-TEmz65ix-dkMXjw2L2XM5fn15m9_OypYBDiVSgt8YKxwQDaFqrJJVGNthQYX3-aZipnad1Vit4RSuQVuSeK_CKTcjN4ew2hs_RpUGvu9S6vjcbF8akGa-ZyO7-BxEoqyTN4PUvcBXGuMkeNGUcJeWCZQgPUBtDStF5vY3d2sSdRtD7TPWfTNk3kcVmcw</recordid><startdate>20070109</startdate><enddate>20070109</enddate><creator>Koster, Ferry</creator><creator>Stokman, Frans</creator><creator>Hodson, Randy</creator><creator>Sanders, Karin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070109</creationdate><title>Solidarity through networks</title><author>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokman, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koster, Ferry</au><au>Stokman, Frans</au><au>Hodson, Randy</au><au>Sanders, Karin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</atitle><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle><date>2007-01-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>117-137</pages><issn>0142-5455</issn><eissn>1758-7069</eissn><coden>EMREDQ</coden><abstract>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/01425450710719978</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5455 |
ispartof | Employee relations, 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137 |
issn | 0142-5455 1758-7069 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35637425 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Behavior Cooperation Employee attitude Employees Ethnography Organizational behavior Studies Teams Teamwork |
title | Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solidarity%20through%20networks:%20The%20effects%20of%20task%20and%20informal%20interdependence%20on%20cooperation%20within%20teams&rft.jtitle=Employee%20relations&rft.au=Koster,%20Ferry&rft.date=2007-01-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=117-137&rft.issn=0142-5455&rft.eissn=1758-7069&rft.coden=EMREDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01425450710719978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1177707101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235182573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |