Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Employee relations 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137
Hauptverfasser: Koster, Ferry, Stokman, Frans, Hodson, Randy, Sanders, Karin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Employee relations
container_volume 29
creator Koster, Ferry
Stokman, Frans
Hodson, Randy
Sanders, Karin
description Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/01425450710719978
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35637425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1177707101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMouFY_gHgpHrytziSbTXKU4j8oeLD3kN0kduu2qcku0m9vSj3pQRh4DPObGd4j5BLhFhHkHWBFecVBYC6lhDwiBQouSwG1OibFfl5mgJ-Ss5RWAHmLsYJcvYW-syZ2w246LGMY35fTjRu-QvxI5-TEmz65ix-dkMXjw2L2XM5fn15m9_OypYBDiVSgt8YKxwQDaFqrJJVGNthQYX3-aZipnad1Vit4RSuQVuSeK_CKTcjN4ew2hs_RpUGvu9S6vjcbF8akGa-ZyO7-BxEoqyTN4PUvcBXGuMkeNGUcJeWCZQgPUBtDStF5vY3d2sSdRtD7TPWfTNk3kcVmcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235182573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</creator><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01425450710719978</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMREDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cooperation ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Ethnography ; Organizational behavior ; Studies ; Teams ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Employee relations, 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,966,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokman, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><title>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</title><title>Employee relations</title><description>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0142-5455</issn><issn>1758-7069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMouFY_gHgpHrytziSbTXKU4j8oeLD3kN0kduu2qcku0m9vSj3pQRh4DPObGd4j5BLhFhHkHWBFecVBYC6lhDwiBQouSwG1OibFfl5mgJ-Ss5RWAHmLsYJcvYW-syZ2w246LGMY35fTjRu-QvxI5-TEmz65ix-dkMXjw2L2XM5fn15m9_OypYBDiVSgt8YKxwQDaFqrJJVGNthQYX3-aZipnad1Vit4RSuQVuSeK_CKTcjN4ew2hs_RpUGvu9S6vjcbF8akGa-ZyO7-BxEoqyTN4PUvcBXGuMkeNGUcJeWCZQgPUBtDStF5vY3d2sSdRtD7TPWfTNk3kcVmcw</recordid><startdate>20070109</startdate><enddate>20070109</enddate><creator>Koster, Ferry</creator><creator>Stokman, Frans</creator><creator>Hodson, Randy</creator><creator>Sanders, Karin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070109</creationdate><title>Solidarity through networks</title><author>Koster, Ferry ; Stokman, Frans ; Hodson, Randy ; Sanders, Karin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-1271fdad7e37300bcd9828a8b1b27df455a3a6ef26a3ad7542408d7f26590f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koster, Ferry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokman, Frans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Karin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koster, Ferry</au><au>Stokman, Frans</au><au>Hodson, Randy</au><au>Sanders, Karin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams</atitle><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle><date>2007-01-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>117-137</pages><issn>0142-5455</issn><eissn>1758-7069</eissn><coden>EMREDQ</coden><abstract>Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of task and informal networks and their interaction on cooperative types of employee behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Two studies are used to examine the research question. The first dataset consists of book-length ethnographies providing information at the team level. The second dataset is gathered through a survey across ten different organisations and provides information at the employee level. Both datasets are analysed using OLS regression. Findings - Cooperative behaviour is positively affected by task and informal interdependence relationships. However, when employees have task and informal interdependence relationships with co-workers, they may show less cooperative behaviour. Research limitations/implications - A major limitation of this study is that it was not possible to include information about the structure of the networks in which the employees are embedded. The study provides evidence for the existence of exchange relationships between the employee and the team. Besides that, the study shows the importance of including formal and informal networks to study cooperative behaviour of employees. Practical implications - The findings provide practical information about how to manage cooperation within teams. Cooperative relationships can be created by either creating task or informal interdependence. Besides that, managers should strike a balance between task and informal interdependence. Originality/value - Existing research tends to focus on the effects of one type of network on behaviour. This research shows that different networks may affect employee behaviour at the same time.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/01425450710719978</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5455
ispartof Employee relations, 2007-01, Vol.29 (2), p.117-137
issn 0142-5455
1758-7069
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35637425
source Emerald Journals
subjects Behavior
Cooperation
Employee attitude
Employees
Ethnography
Organizational behavior
Studies
Teams
Teamwork
title Solidarity through networks: The effects of task and informal interdependence on cooperation within teams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Solidarity%20through%20networks:%20The%20effects%20of%20task%20and%20informal%20interdependence%20on%20cooperation%20within%20teams&rft.jtitle=Employee%20relations&rft.au=Koster,%20Ferry&rft.date=2007-01-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=117-137&rft.issn=0142-5455&rft.eissn=1758-7069&rft.coden=EMREDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01425450710719978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1177707101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235182573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true