Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck
This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of performance of constructed facilities 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.305-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Journal of performance of constructed facilities |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Harris, Devin K Cousins, Tommy Murray, Thomas M Sotelino, Elisa D |
description | This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35346094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35346094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-b01c52ecc22f78ffb8ae42000f4e9d9344cdfc93e6c36ea707eb9dcd0ca4a0b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujiYj-h71I4LA6bfejJfGACEpCogl6bkp3iovLLm4XDf_ebjAc9TSXZ9535iGkR-GGQkJv-6PFeDIAIdKQCyb6DEAMGBvGfQ7x4IR0qIx4GMcgT0nniJ2TC-fWAMBSmXbIcJpjkQWz8gtdk690k1dlUNlABwtdZt-5eQ9eCt1gsNi7BjfBfZ1nKwwe0HxckjOrC4dXv7NL3qaT1_FTOH9-nI1H81BHFJpwCdTEDI1hzKbC2qXQGPlbwUYoM8mjyGTWSI6J4QnqFFJcysxkYHSkYSl4l_QOudu6-tz5M9UmdwaLQpdY7ZziMY8S8L_-BzIKMaWiBe8OoKkr52q0alvnG13vFQXVulWqdataaaqVplq3ijEVK-_W71__FmlndGFrXZrcHUMYJNLLTTwnD5zHUK2rXV16UceSPzt-AE1KiwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21051184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Harris, Devin K ; Cousins, Tommy ; Murray, Thomas M ; Sotelino, Elisa D</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Devin K ; Cousins, Tommy ; Murray, Thomas M ; Sotelino, Elisa D</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPCFEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bridge elements ; Bridges ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Stresses. Safety ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.305-315</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-b01c52ecc22f78ffb8ae42000f4e9d9344cdfc93e6c36ea707eb9dcd0ca4a0b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-b01c52ecc22f78ffb8ae42000f4e9d9344cdfc93e6c36ea707eb9dcd0ca4a0b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20697976$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Devin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Tommy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sotelino, Elisa D</creatorcontrib><title>Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck</title><title>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</title><description>This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bridge elements</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Stresses. Safety</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0887-3828</issn><issn>1943-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujiYj-h71I4LA6bfejJfGACEpCogl6bkp3iovLLm4XDf_ebjAc9TSXZ9535iGkR-GGQkJv-6PFeDIAIdKQCyb6DEAMGBvGfQ7x4IR0qIx4GMcgT0nniJ2TC-fWAMBSmXbIcJpjkQWz8gtdk690k1dlUNlABwtdZt-5eQ9eCt1gsNi7BjfBfZ1nKwwe0HxckjOrC4dXv7NL3qaT1_FTOH9-nI1H81BHFJpwCdTEDI1hzKbC2qXQGPlbwUYoM8mjyGTWSI6J4QnqFFJcysxkYHSkYSl4l_QOudu6-tz5M9UmdwaLQpdY7ZziMY8S8L_-BzIKMaWiBe8OoKkr52q0alvnG13vFQXVulWqdataaaqVplq3ijEVK-_W71__FmlndGFrXZrcHUMYJNLLTTwnD5zHUK2rXV16UceSPzt-AE1KiwY</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Harris, Devin K</creator><creator>Cousins, Tommy</creator><creator>Murray, Thomas M</creator><creator>Sotelino, Elisa D</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck</title><author>Harris, Devin K ; Cousins, Tommy ; Murray, Thomas M ; Sotelino, Elisa D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a410t-b01c52ecc22f78ffb8ae42000f4e9d9344cdfc93e6c36ea707eb9dcd0ca4a0b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bridge elements</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Stresses. Safety</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Devin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Tommy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sotelino, Elisa D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Devin K</au><au>Cousins, Tommy</au><au>Murray, Thomas M</au><au>Sotelino, Elisa D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck</atitle><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>305-315</pages><issn>0887-3828</issn><eissn>1943-5509</eissn><coden>JPCFEV</coden><abstract>This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-3828 |
ispartof | Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2008-10, Vol.22 (5), p.305-315 |
issn | 0887-3828 1943-5509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35346094 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Applied sciences Bridge elements Bridges Buildings. Public works Exact sciences and technology Stresses. Safety Structural analysis. Stresses TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A38%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Investigation%20of%20a%20Sandwich%20Plate%20System%20Bridge%20Deck&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20performance%20of%20constructed%20facilities&rft.au=Harris,%20Devin%20K&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=305-315&rft.issn=0887-3828&rft.eissn=1943-5509&rft.coden=JPCFEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35346094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21051184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |