Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems
Many authors report on the effect of rice–fish culture on rice yields. Some reports show increased rice yields, others show no effect or even decreased yields. To verify the impact of rice–fish culture, data gathered over eight experiments (1995–1999) at the Co Do experimental rice–fish station, Vie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of agricultural science 2002-02, Vol.138 (1), p.63-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | The Journal of agricultural science |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | VROMANT, N. DUONG, L. T. OLLEVIER, F. |
description | Many authors report on the effect of rice–fish culture on rice yields. Some reports show increased rice yields, others show no effect or even decreased yields. To verify the impact of rice–fish culture, data gathered over eight experiments (1995–1999) at the Co Do experimental rice–fish station, Vietnam, were analysed through multiple regressions with rice yield and different yield components as the dependent variables. We used eight independent variables: season, water depth, rice variety, rice seeding rate, and the effective stocking density (ESD) of silver barb, Nile tilapia, common carp and snakeskin gourami. Season had the biggest impact on nearly all dependent variables. Rice yields in the wet season were on average 2·42 t/ha lower as compared to the dry season. Higher water levels decreased the number of panicles/m2 and the rice yield. The rice seeding rate affected the yield component variables, but had no impact on the rice yield. Silver barb feeding decreased the number of panicles/m2 but this was compensated by an increased number of grains/panicle. Snakeskin gourami had a positive effect on panicles/m2 and, together with common carp, on sink capacity, probably through improved nutrient cycling in presence of fish and improved nutrient uptake by the rice plant. Snakeskin gourami had a negative effect on the ripening ability, whereas Nile tilapia had a positive effect. Fish did not have any impact on the rice yield. Increased water level and reduced rice arable area, the main two requirements for rice–fish culture, result in lower rice yields from rice–fish systems as compared to monoculture systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021859601001642 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35181798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859601001642</cupid><sourcerecordid>35181798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-65bca75efe248becf99c29c1d038ea37dc31fcf4ec9a50640734ff09097826b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMouFYfwLtB0LvRk0kmfy6l9I9lqxT1OmQzJ23qTGZNZqF713foG_okZrqLBUUK4STw_c7Hl3MIeU3hPQUqP3wFaKhqtQAKQAVvnpAF5ULXbalPyWKW61l_Tl7kfA0AErRaEDzyHt1Ujb7yIV9VY6ymK6y2AfuusrHbv9w4rMeIccozmYLDKsRyJrxMdsIZiG6TUiHu1V-3d_d2eZsnHPJL8szbPuOr_X1Avh8ffTs8rZdfTj4dflzWjnM-1aJdOStb9NhwtULntXaNdrQDptAy2TlGvfMcnbYtCA6Sce9Bg5aqESvFDsi7ne86jT83mCczhOyw723EcZMNa6miUj8ONpRKIZQo4Ju_wOtxk2L5hGmAyRKinSG6g1wac07ozTqFwaatoWDm9Zh_1lN63u6NbXa298lGF_JDI-NMCQmFq3dcKJO8-aPb9MMIyWRrxMmFOTuH4_PPyzNzWni2z2KHVQrdJT4k_n-a31L1rm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203706456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>VROMANT, N. ; DUONG, L. T. ; OLLEVIER, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>VROMANT, N. ; DUONG, L. T. ; OLLEVIER, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Many authors report on the effect of rice–fish culture on rice yields. Some reports show increased rice yields, others show no effect or even decreased yields. To verify the impact of rice–fish culture, data gathered over eight experiments (1995–1999) at the Co Do experimental rice–fish station, Vietnam, were analysed through multiple regressions with rice yield and different yield components as the dependent variables. We used eight independent variables: season, water depth, rice variety, rice seeding rate, and the effective stocking density (ESD) of silver barb, Nile tilapia, common carp and snakeskin gourami. Season had the biggest impact on nearly all dependent variables. Rice yields in the wet season were on average 2·42 t/ha lower as compared to the dry season. Higher water levels decreased the number of panicles/m2 and the rice yield. The rice seeding rate affected the yield component variables, but had no impact on the rice yield. Silver barb feeding decreased the number of panicles/m2 but this was compensated by an increased number of grains/panicle. Snakeskin gourami had a positive effect on panicles/m2 and, together with common carp, on sink capacity, probably through improved nutrient cycling in presence of fish and improved nutrient uptake by the rice plant. Snakeskin gourami had a negative effect on the ripening ability, whereas Nile tilapia had a positive effect. Fish did not have any impact on the rice yield. Increased water level and reduced rice arable area, the main two requirements for rice–fish culture, result in lower rice yields from rice–fish systems as compared to monoculture systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859601001642</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASIAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural and farming systems ; Agricultural production ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carp ; Crop yield ; CROPS AND SOILS ; Dependent variables ; Dry season ; Experiments ; Farmers ; Fish ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Monoculture ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrient uptake ; Pisciculture ; Rainy season ; Rice ; Seasons ; Tilapia ; Vertebrate aquaculture ; Water depth ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2002-02, Vol.138 (1), p.63-71</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-65bca75efe248becf99c29c1d038ea37dc31fcf4ec9a50640734ff09097826b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859601001642/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13438670$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VROMANT, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUONG, L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLLEVIER, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>Many authors report on the effect of rice–fish culture on rice yields. Some reports show increased rice yields, others show no effect or even decreased yields. To verify the impact of rice–fish culture, data gathered over eight experiments (1995–1999) at the Co Do experimental rice–fish station, Vietnam, were analysed through multiple regressions with rice yield and different yield components as the dependent variables. We used eight independent variables: season, water depth, rice variety, rice seeding rate, and the effective stocking density (ESD) of silver barb, Nile tilapia, common carp and snakeskin gourami. Season had the biggest impact on nearly all dependent variables. Rice yields in the wet season were on average 2·42 t/ha lower as compared to the dry season. Higher water levels decreased the number of panicles/m2 and the rice yield. The rice seeding rate affected the yield component variables, but had no impact on the rice yield. Silver barb feeding decreased the number of panicles/m2 but this was compensated by an increased number of grains/panicle. Snakeskin gourami had a positive effect on panicles/m2 and, together with common carp, on sink capacity, probably through improved nutrient cycling in presence of fish and improved nutrient uptake by the rice plant. Snakeskin gourami had a negative effect on the ripening ability, whereas Nile tilapia had a positive effect. Fish did not have any impact on the rice yield. Increased water level and reduced rice arable area, the main two requirements for rice–fish culture, result in lower rice yields from rice–fish systems as compared to monoculture systems.</description><subject>Agricultural and farming systems</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>CROPS AND SOILS</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient uptake</subject><subject>Pisciculture</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Vertebrate aquaculture</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMouFYfwLtB0LvRk0kmfy6l9I9lqxT1OmQzJ23qTGZNZqF713foG_okZrqLBUUK4STw_c7Hl3MIeU3hPQUqP3wFaKhqtQAKQAVvnpAF5ULXbalPyWKW61l_Tl7kfA0AErRaEDzyHt1Ujb7yIV9VY6ymK6y2AfuusrHbv9w4rMeIccozmYLDKsRyJrxMdsIZiG6TUiHu1V-3d_d2eZsnHPJL8szbPuOr_X1Avh8ffTs8rZdfTj4dflzWjnM-1aJdOStb9NhwtULntXaNdrQDptAy2TlGvfMcnbYtCA6Sce9Bg5aqESvFDsi7ne86jT83mCczhOyw723EcZMNa6miUj8ONpRKIZQo4Ju_wOtxk2L5hGmAyRKinSG6g1wac07ozTqFwaatoWDm9Zh_1lN63u6NbXa298lGF_JDI-NMCQmFq3dcKJO8-aPb9MMIyWRrxMmFOTuH4_PPyzNzWni2z2KHVQrdJT4k_n-a31L1rm8</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>VROMANT, N.</creator><creator>DUONG, L. T.</creator><creator>OLLEVIER, F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems</title><author>VROMANT, N. ; DUONG, L. T. ; OLLEVIER, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-65bca75efe248becf99c29c1d038ea37dc31fcf4ec9a50640734ff09097826b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and farming systems</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>CROPS AND SOILS</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient uptake</topic><topic>Pisciculture</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Vertebrate aquaculture</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VROMANT, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUONG, L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OLLEVIER, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VROMANT, N.</au><au>DUONG, L. T.</au><au>OLLEVIER, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>63-71</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><coden>JASIAB</coden><abstract>Many authors report on the effect of rice–fish culture on rice yields. Some reports show increased rice yields, others show no effect or even decreased yields. To verify the impact of rice–fish culture, data gathered over eight experiments (1995–1999) at the Co Do experimental rice–fish station, Vietnam, were analysed through multiple regressions with rice yield and different yield components as the dependent variables. We used eight independent variables: season, water depth, rice variety, rice seeding rate, and the effective stocking density (ESD) of silver barb, Nile tilapia, common carp and snakeskin gourami. Season had the biggest impact on nearly all dependent variables. Rice yields in the wet season were on average 2·42 t/ha lower as compared to the dry season. Higher water levels decreased the number of panicles/m2 and the rice yield. The rice seeding rate affected the yield component variables, but had no impact on the rice yield. Silver barb feeding decreased the number of panicles/m2 but this was compensated by an increased number of grains/panicle. Snakeskin gourami had a positive effect on panicles/m2 and, together with common carp, on sink capacity, probably through improved nutrient cycling in presence of fish and improved nutrient uptake by the rice plant. Snakeskin gourami had a negative effect on the ripening ability, whereas Nile tilapia had a positive effect. Fish did not have any impact on the rice yield. Increased water level and reduced rice arable area, the main two requirements for rice–fish culture, result in lower rice yields from rice–fish systems as compared to monoculture systems.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859601001642</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8596 |
ispartof | The Journal of agricultural science, 2002-02, Vol.138 (1), p.63-71 |
issn | 0021-8596 1469-5146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35181798 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Agricultural and farming systems Agricultural production Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal aquaculture Animal productions Biological and medical sciences Carp Crop yield CROPS AND SOILS Dependent variables Dry season Experiments Farmers Fish Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Monoculture Nutrient cycles Nutrient uptake Pisciculture Rainy season Rice Seasons Tilapia Vertebrate aquaculture Water depth Water levels |
title | Effect of fish on the yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice–fish systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A23%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20fish%20on%20the%20yield%20and%20yield%20components%20of%20rice%20in%20integrated%20concurrent%20rice%E2%80%93fish%20systems&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=VROMANT,%20N.&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=63-71&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft.coden=JASIAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859601001642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35181798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203706456&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859601001642&rfr_iscdi=true |