Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories
This paper describes shaking table tests of three eight-story building models: all are masonry structures in the upper stories, with or without frame-shear walls of one-or two-stories at the bottom. The test results of damage characteristics and seismic responses are provided and compared. Then, non...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2008-09, Vol.7 (3), p.271-283 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 283 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 271 |
| container_title | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Xiong, Lihong David, Xiong Wu, Ruifeng Xia, Jingqian |
| description | This paper describes shaking table tests of three eight-story building models: all are masonry structures in the upper stories, with or without frame-shear walls of one-or two-stories at the bottom. The test results of damage characteristics and seismic responses are provided and compared. Then, nonlinear response analyses are conducted to examine the reliability of the dynamic analysis. Finally, many nonlinear response analyses are performed and it is concluded that for relatively hard sites under a certain lateral stiffness ratio (i.e., the ratio of the stiffness of the lowest upper masonry story to that of the frame-shear wall story), the masonry structure with one-story frame-shear wall at the bottom performs better than a structure built entirely of masonry, and a masonry structure with frame-shear wall of two stories performs better than with one-story frame-shear wall. In relatively soft soil conditions, all three structures have similar performane. In addition, some suggestions that could be helpful for design of masonry structures with ground story of frame-shear wall structure in seismic intensity region VII, such as the appropriate lateral stiffness ratio, shear force increase factor of the frame-shear wall story, and permissible maximum height of the building, are proposed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35144382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21277871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-96f44f9ba17e6b6bc4417ce2711211691cfb6dcc2f7bb4ab2394d1dc3fb349093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhU1poGnSH9Cb6CE3tRpJlqxjCU0aCOTQBnoTkixlvZXtRONl8b-Pkg0UCiGneTDfezDzmuYzsK_AmP6GAB0TlLGOsq41dH3XHIMxgrZM_HlftdJAhVLyQ_MRccuYklyo42b7a-P-DtMdWZzPkSwRFyRu6km_Tm4cQtUurxiRzImMDueprGTvciZ-N-S-OpHsh2VDUnFjpLiJrjzva8pC8ryPheAylyHiaXOUXMb46WWeNLcXP36f_6TXN5dX59-vqZOMLdSoJGUy3oGOyisfpAQdItcAHEAZCMmrPgSetPfSeS6M7KEPInkhDTPipDk75N6X-WFXD7LjgCHm7KY479CKFqQUHX8T5MC17jRU8Mt_4HbelfqYyrDOtK1-huAAhTIjlpjsfRlGV1YLzD51ZA8d2dqRferIrtXDDx6s7HQXy7_g102PqOmWDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208955771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Xiong, Lihong ; David, Xiong ; Wu, Ruifeng ; Xia, Jingqian</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lihong ; David, Xiong ; Wu, Ruifeng ; Xia, Jingqian</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes shaking table tests of three eight-story building models: all are masonry structures in the upper stories, with or without frame-shear walls of one-or two-stories at the bottom. The test results of damage characteristics and seismic responses are provided and compared. Then, nonlinear response analyses are conducted to examine the reliability of the dynamic analysis. Finally, many nonlinear response analyses are performed and it is concluded that for relatively hard sites under a certain lateral stiffness ratio (i.e., the ratio of the stiffness of the lowest upper masonry story to that of the frame-shear wall story), the masonry structure with one-story frame-shear wall at the bottom performs better than a structure built entirely of masonry, and a masonry structure with frame-shear wall of two stories performs better than with one-story frame-shear wall. In relatively soft soil conditions, all three structures have similar performane. In addition, some suggestions that could be helpful for design of masonry structures with ground story of frame-shear wall structure in seismic intensity region VII, such as the appropriate lateral stiffness ratio, shear force increase factor of the frame-shear wall story, and permissible maximum height of the building, are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1671-3664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-503X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Control ; Dynamical Systems ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Seismic response ; Seismology ; Shear stress ; Structural engineering ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008-09, Vol.7 (3), p.271-283</ispartof><rights>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-96f44f9ba17e6b6bc4417ce2711211691cfb6dcc2f7bb4ab2394d1dc3fb349093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-96f44f9ba17e6b6bc4417ce2711211691cfb6dcc2f7bb4ab2394d1dc3fb349093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Xiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ruifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jingqian</creatorcontrib><title>Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories</title><title>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</title><addtitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</addtitle><description>This paper describes shaking table tests of three eight-story building models: all are masonry structures in the upper stories, with or without frame-shear walls of one-or two-stories at the bottom. The test results of damage characteristics and seismic responses are provided and compared. Then, nonlinear response analyses are conducted to examine the reliability of the dynamic analysis. Finally, many nonlinear response analyses are performed and it is concluded that for relatively hard sites under a certain lateral stiffness ratio (i.e., the ratio of the stiffness of the lowest upper masonry story to that of the frame-shear wall story), the masonry structure with one-story frame-shear wall at the bottom performs better than a structure built entirely of masonry, and a masonry structure with frame-shear wall of two stories performs better than with one-story frame-shear wall. In relatively soft soil conditions, all three structures have similar performane. In addition, some suggestions that could be helpful for design of masonry structures with ground story of frame-shear wall structure in seismic intensity region VII, such as the appropriate lateral stiffness ratio, shear force increase factor of the frame-shear wall story, and permissible maximum height of the building, are proposed.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1671-3664</issn><issn>1993-503X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhU1poGnSH9Cb6CE3tRpJlqxjCU0aCOTQBnoTkixlvZXtRONl8b-Pkg0UCiGneTDfezDzmuYzsK_AmP6GAB0TlLGOsq41dH3XHIMxgrZM_HlftdJAhVLyQ_MRccuYklyo42b7a-P-DtMdWZzPkSwRFyRu6km_Tm4cQtUurxiRzImMDueprGTvciZ-N-S-OpHsh2VDUnFjpLiJrjzva8pC8ryPheAylyHiaXOUXMb46WWeNLcXP36f_6TXN5dX59-vqZOMLdSoJGUy3oGOyisfpAQdItcAHEAZCMmrPgSetPfSeS6M7KEPInkhDTPipDk75N6X-WFXD7LjgCHm7KY479CKFqQUHX8T5MC17jRU8Mt_4HbelfqYyrDOtK1-huAAhTIjlpjsfRlGV1YLzD51ZA8d2dqRferIrtXDDx6s7HQXy7_g102PqOmWDQ</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Xiong, Lihong</creator><creator>David, Xiong</creator><creator>Wu, Ruifeng</creator><creator>Xia, Jingqian</creator><general>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories</title><author>Xiong, Lihong ; David, Xiong ; Wu, Ruifeng ; Xia, Jingqian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a400t-96f44f9ba17e6b6bc4417ce2711211691cfb6dcc2f7bb4ab2394d1dc3fb349093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Xiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ruifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jingqian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiong, Lihong</au><au>David, Xiong</au><au>Wu, Ruifeng</au><au>Xia, Jingqian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle><stitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</stitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>271-283</pages><issn>1671-3664</issn><eissn>1993-503X</eissn><abstract>This paper describes shaking table tests of three eight-story building models: all are masonry structures in the upper stories, with or without frame-shear walls of one-or two-stories at the bottom. The test results of damage characteristics and seismic responses are provided and compared. Then, nonlinear response analyses are conducted to examine the reliability of the dynamic analysis. Finally, many nonlinear response analyses are performed and it is concluded that for relatively hard sites under a certain lateral stiffness ratio (i.e., the ratio of the stiffness of the lowest upper masonry story to that of the frame-shear wall story), the masonry structure with one-story frame-shear wall at the bottom performs better than a structure built entirely of masonry, and a masonry structure with frame-shear wall of two stories performs better than with one-story frame-shear wall. In relatively soft soil conditions, all three structures have similar performane. In addition, some suggestions that could be helpful for design of masonry structures with ground story of frame-shear wall structure in seismic intensity region VII, such as the appropriate lateral stiffness ratio, shear force increase factor of the frame-shear wall story, and permissible maximum height of the building, are proposed.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration</pub><doi>10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1671-3664 |
| ispartof | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008-09, Vol.7 (3), p.271-283 |
| issn | 1671-3664 1993-503X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35144382 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Civil Engineering Control Dynamical Systems Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquakes Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Seismic response Seismology Shear stress Structural engineering Vibration |
| title | Shaking table tests and dynamic analyses of masonry wall buildings with frame-shear walls at lower stories |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaking%20table%20tests%20and%20dynamic%20analyses%20of%20masonry%20wall%20buildings%20with%20frame-shear%20walls%20at%20lower%20stories&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20Engineering%20and%20Engineering%20Vibration&rft.au=Xiong,%20Lihong&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=271-283&rft.issn=1671-3664&rft.eissn=1993-503X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11803-008-0859-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21277871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208955771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |